Pedicle Screw Insertion: Is O-Arm-Based Navigation Superior to the Conventional Freehand Technique? A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis

被引:28
|
作者
Sun, Jun [1 ]
Wu, Dongying [1 ]
Wang, Qiuan [1 ]
Wei, Yangyang [1 ]
Yuan, Feng [1 ]
机构
[1] Xuzhou Med Univ, Dept Orthoped, Affiliated Hosp, Xuzhou, Jiangsu, Peoples R China
关键词
C-arm; Freehand technique; Navigation; O-arm; Pedicle screw; Spinal surgery; COMPUTED-TOMOGRAPHY; PLACEMENT ACCURACY; RADIATION-EXPOSURE; FLUOROSCOPY; LUMBAR; COMPLICATIONS; FIXATION; SURGEON;
D O I
10.1016/j.wneu.2020.07.205
中图分类号
R74 [神经病学与精神病学];
学科分类号
摘要
BACKGROUND: Although O-arm-based navigation (ON) has been considered a better choice than the conventional freehand (FH) technique for spine surgery, clinical evidence showing the accuracy of ON compared with the FH technique is limited. The purpose of this study was to evaluate the accuracy of pedicle screw insertion under ON compared with the FH technique. METHODS: The Cochrane Library, Ovid, Web of Science, PubMed, Embase, and CNKI online databases were searched up to January 2020. Because only a few randomized controlled trials were anticipated, prospective and retrospective comparative studies were also evaluated to compare the accuracy of pedicle screw insertion between ON and FH. Statistical analysis was performed using Stata 16.0. The primary outcomes extracted from articles that met the selection criteria were expressed as odds ratios for dichotomous outcomes with a 95% confidence interval. A chi(2) test and I-2 statistics were used to evaluate heterogeneity. RESULTS: A total of 20 reviews were included in this meta-analysis without identifying additional studies from the references of published articles. These reviews included 1422 patients and 9982 screws. ON was used to insert 4797 pedicle screws and 5185 pedicle screws were inserted using the conventional FH technique with C-arm assistance. The meta-analysis showed that ON is significantly more accurate than FH pedicle screw insertion (odds ratio, 2.46; 95% confidence interval, 1.92-3.16; I-2 = 43.4%; P = 0.021). I-2 indicates that the studies have a moderate statistical heterogeneity; subgroup analysis decreased heterogeneity significantly. CONCLUSIONS: Compared with conventional methods, navigation provides greater accuracy in the placement of pedicle screws, accelerates the insertion, and reduces the complications associated with screw insertion. However, it may increase exposure time to radiation, which may harm the patient's or surgeon's health.
引用
收藏
页码:E87 / E99
页数:13
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [31] Accuracy of Pedicle Screw Placement and Four Other Clinical Outcomes of Robotic Guidance Technique versus Computer-Assisted Navigation in Thoracolumbar Surgery: A Meta-Analysis
    Zhou, Lu-Ping
    Zhang, Ren-Jie
    Sun, Yi-Wei
    Zhang, Lai
    Shen, Cai-Liang
    WORLD NEUROSURGERY, 2021, 146 : E139 - E150
  • [32] Simultaneous single-position lateral interbody fusion and percutaneous pedicle screw fixation using O-arm-based navigation reduces the occupancy time of the operating room
    Ouchida, Jun
    Kanemura, Tokumi
    Satake, Kotaro
    Nakashima, Hiroaki
    Ishikawa, Yoshimoto
    Imagama, Shiro
    EUROPEAN SPINE JOURNAL, 2020, 29 (06) : 1277 - 1286
  • [33] Can the cortical bone trajectory screw technique be an alternative method to the pedicle screw in posterior lumbar fusion? A systematic review and meta-analysis
    Kim, Kun-Tae
    Song, Myung-Geun
    Lee, Eun-Chang
    Seo, Min-Seok
    Lee, Dong-Yeong
    Kim, DongHee
    ACTA ORTHOPAEDICA ET TRAUMATOLOGICA TURCICA, 2021, 55 (06) : 552 - 562
  • [34] Accuracy of Pedicle Screw Placement Methods in Pediatrics and Adolescents Spinal Surgery: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis
    De Vega, Brigita
    Navarro, Aida Ribera
    Gibson, Alexander
    Kalaskar, Deepak M.
    GLOBAL SPINE JOURNAL, 2022, 12 (04) : 677 - 688
  • [35] Robotic and navigated pedicle screws are safer and more accurate than fluoroscopic freehand screws: a systematic review and meta-analysis
    Matur, Abhijith, V
    Palmisciano, Paolo
    Duah, Henry O.
    Chilakapati, Sai S.
    Cheng, Joseph S.
    Adogwa, Owoicho
    SPINE JOURNAL, 2023, 23 (02): : 197 - 208
  • [36] Comparison of the perioperative parameters between computer navigation and fluoroscopy guidance for pedicle screw placement A protocol for a systematic review and meta-analysis
    Li, Qianchun
    Chen, Botao
    Chen, Rigao
    Yu, Yang
    Jiang, Leiming
    Fan, Xiaohong
    MEDICINE, 2020, 99 (28) : E21064
  • [37] Intraoperative, full-rotation, three-dimensional image (O-arm)-based navigation system for cervical pedicle screw insertion
    Ishikawa, Yoshimoto
    Kanemura, Tokumi
    Yoshida, Go
    Matsumoto, Akiyuki
    Ito, Zenya
    Tauchi, Ryoji
    Muramoto, Akio
    Ohno, Shuichiro
    Nishimura, Yusuke
    JOURNAL OF NEUROSURGERY-SPINE, 2011, 15 (05) : 472 - 478
  • [38] Robot-assisted vs freehand pedicle screw fixation in spine surgery - a systematic review and a meta-analysis of comparative studies
    Yu, Lingjia
    Chen, Xi
    Margalit, Adam
    Peng, Huiming
    Qiu, Guixing
    Qian, Wenwei
    INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF MEDICAL ROBOTICS AND COMPUTER ASSISTED SURGERY, 2018, 14 (03):
  • [39] Meta-analysis of fluoroscopic and navigation-based cervical pedicle screw placement
    Soliman, Mohamed A. R.
    Khan, Asham
    Pollina, John
    Mullin, Jeffrey P.
    JOURNAL OF NEUROSURGERY-SPINE, 2022, 36 (03) : 522 - 523
  • [40] Accurate Placement and Revisions for Cervical Pedicle Screws Placed With or Without Navigation: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis
    Bindels, B. J. J.
    Dronkers, B. E. G.
    Smits, M. L. J.
    Verlaan, J. J.
    GLOBAL SPINE JOURNAL, 2024, 14 (03) : 1018 - 1037