Pedicle Screw Insertion: Is O-Arm-Based Navigation Superior to the Conventional Freehand Technique? A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis

被引:28
|
作者
Sun, Jun [1 ]
Wu, Dongying [1 ]
Wang, Qiuan [1 ]
Wei, Yangyang [1 ]
Yuan, Feng [1 ]
机构
[1] Xuzhou Med Univ, Dept Orthoped, Affiliated Hosp, Xuzhou, Jiangsu, Peoples R China
关键词
C-arm; Freehand technique; Navigation; O-arm; Pedicle screw; Spinal surgery; COMPUTED-TOMOGRAPHY; PLACEMENT ACCURACY; RADIATION-EXPOSURE; FLUOROSCOPY; LUMBAR; COMPLICATIONS; FIXATION; SURGEON;
D O I
10.1016/j.wneu.2020.07.205
中图分类号
R74 [神经病学与精神病学];
学科分类号
摘要
BACKGROUND: Although O-arm-based navigation (ON) has been considered a better choice than the conventional freehand (FH) technique for spine surgery, clinical evidence showing the accuracy of ON compared with the FH technique is limited. The purpose of this study was to evaluate the accuracy of pedicle screw insertion under ON compared with the FH technique. METHODS: The Cochrane Library, Ovid, Web of Science, PubMed, Embase, and CNKI online databases were searched up to January 2020. Because only a few randomized controlled trials were anticipated, prospective and retrospective comparative studies were also evaluated to compare the accuracy of pedicle screw insertion between ON and FH. Statistical analysis was performed using Stata 16.0. The primary outcomes extracted from articles that met the selection criteria were expressed as odds ratios for dichotomous outcomes with a 95% confidence interval. A chi(2) test and I-2 statistics were used to evaluate heterogeneity. RESULTS: A total of 20 reviews were included in this meta-analysis without identifying additional studies from the references of published articles. These reviews included 1422 patients and 9982 screws. ON was used to insert 4797 pedicle screws and 5185 pedicle screws were inserted using the conventional FH technique with C-arm assistance. The meta-analysis showed that ON is significantly more accurate than FH pedicle screw insertion (odds ratio, 2.46; 95% confidence interval, 1.92-3.16; I-2 = 43.4%; P = 0.021). I-2 indicates that the studies have a moderate statistical heterogeneity; subgroup analysis decreased heterogeneity significantly. CONCLUSIONS: Compared with conventional methods, navigation provides greater accuracy in the placement of pedicle screws, accelerates the insertion, and reduces the complications associated with screw insertion. However, it may increase exposure time to radiation, which may harm the patient's or surgeon's health.
引用
收藏
页码:E87 / E99
页数:13
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [1] Accuracy of pedicle screw placement in the thoracic and lumbosacral spines using O-arm-based navigation versus conventional freehand technique
    Jing L.
    Wang Z.
    Sun Z.
    Zhang H.
    Wang J.
    Wang G.
    Chinese Neurosurgical Journal, 5 (1)
  • [2] Comparison of the accuracy between robot-assisted and conventional freehand pedicle screw placement: a systematic review and meta-analysis
    Liu, Hao
    Chen, Weikai
    Wang, Zongyi
    Lin, Jun
    Meng, Bin
    Yang, Huilin
    INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF COMPUTER ASSISTED RADIOLOGY AND SURGERY, 2016, 11 (12) : 2273 - 2281
  • [3] O-arm navigation versus C-arm guidance for pedicle screw placement in spine surgery: a systematic review and meta-analysis
    Feng, Weili
    Wang, Weihao
    Chen, Shubiao
    Wu, Kezhou
    Wang, Hu
    INTERNATIONAL ORTHOPAEDICS, 2020, 44 (05) : 919 - 926
  • [4] Safety and accuracy of cannulated pedicle screw placement in scoliosis surgery: a comparison of robotic-navigation, O-arm-based navigation, and freehand techniques
    Li, Chao
    Wang, Zheng
    Li, Donglai
    Tian, Yonghao
    Yuan, Suomao
    Wang, Lianlei
    Liu, Xinyu
    EUROPEAN SPINE JOURNAL, 2023, 32 (09) : 3094 - 3104
  • [5] Cervical pedicle screw instrumentation is more reliable with O-arm-based 3D navigation: analysis of cervical pedicle screw placement accuracy with O-arm-based 3D navigation
    Chachan, Sourabh
    Bin Abd Razak, Hamid Rahmatullah
    Loo, Wee Lim
    Allen, John Carson
    Kumar, Dinesh Shree
    EUROPEAN SPINE JOURNAL, 2018, 27 (11) : 2729 - 2736
  • [6] Pedicle Screw Insertion Accuracy Using O-Arm, Robotic Guidance, or Freehand Technique A Comparative Study
    Laudato, Pietro Aniello
    Pierzchala, Katarzyna
    Schizas, Constantin
    SPINE, 2018, 43 (06) : E373 - E378
  • [7] Cervical Pedicle Screw Insertion Using O-Arm-Based 3D Navigation: Technical Advancement to Improve Accuracy of Screws
    Wada, Keiji
    Tamaki, Ryo
    Inoue, Tomohisa
    Hagiwara, Kenji
    Okazaki, Ken
    WORLD NEUROSURGERY, 2020, 139 : E182 - E188
  • [8] Pedicle screw navigation: a systematic review and meta-analysis of perforation risk for computer-navigated versus freehand insertion A review
    Shin, Benjamin J.
    James, Andrew R.
    Njoku, Innocent U.
    Haertl, Roger
    JOURNAL OF NEUROSURGERY-SPINE, 2012, 17 (02) : 113 - 122
  • [9] Comparison of the accuracy between robot-assisted and conventional freehand pedicle screw placement: a systematic review and meta-analysis
    Hao Liu
    Weikai Chen
    Zongyi Wang
    Jun Lin
    Bin Meng
    Huilin Yang
    International Journal of Computer Assisted Radiology and Surgery, 2016, 11 : 2273 - 2281
  • [10] Pedicle screw insertion accuracy with different assisted methods: a systematic review and meta-analysis of comparative studies
    Tian, Nai-Feng
    Huang, Qi-Shan
    Zhou, Ping
    Zhou, Yang
    Wu, Rui-Kai
    Lou, Yi
    Xu, Hua-Zi
    EUROPEAN SPINE JOURNAL, 2011, 20 (06) : 846 - 859