Comparing treatment outcomes of fractional flow reserve-guided and angiography-guided percutaneous coronary intervention in patients with multi-vessel coronary artery diseases: a systematic review and meta-analysis

被引:0
作者
Xiu, Jiancheng [1 ]
Chen, Gangbin [1 ]
Zheng, Hua [1 ]
Wang, Yuegang [1 ]
Chen, Haibin [1 ]
Liu, Xuewei [1 ]
Wu, Juefei [1 ]
Bin, Jianping [1 ]
机构
[1] Southern Med Univ, Nanfang Hosp, Dept Cardiol, 1838 North Guangzhou Ave, Guangzhou 510515, Guangdong, Peoples R China
来源
CLINICAL AND INVESTIGATIVE MEDICINE | 2016年 / 39卷 / 01期
关键词
FOLLOW-UP; MYOCARDIAL-INFARCTION; FUNCTIONAL SEVERITY; UNSTABLE ANGINA; REVASCULARIZATION; STENOSIS; FAME; ISCHEMIA; STRATEGY;
D O I
暂无
中图分类号
R-3 [医学研究方法]; R3 [基础医学];
学科分类号
1001 ;
摘要
Purpose: Fractional flow reserve (FFR)-guided percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI) is used to assess the need for angioplasty in vessels with intermediate blockages. The treatment outcomes of FFR-guided vs. conventional angiography-guided PCI were evaluated in patients with multi-vessel coronary artery disease (CAD). Methods: Prospective and retrospective studies comparing FFR-guided vs. angiography-guided PCI in patients with multi-vessel CAD were identified from medical databases by two independent reviewers using the terms "percutaneous coronary intervention, fractional flow reserve, angiography, coronary heart disease, major adverse cardiac events (MACE) and myocardial infarction". The primary outcome was the number of stents placed, and the secondary outcomes were procedure time, mortality, myocardial infarction (MI) and MACE rates. Results: Seven studies (three retrospective and four prospective), which included 49,517 patients, were included in this review. A total of 4,755 patients underwent FFR, while 44,697 received angiography-guided PCI. The mean patient age ranged from 58 to 71.7 years. The average number of stents used in FFR patients ranged from 0.3-1.9, and in angiography-guided PCI patients ranged from 0.7-2.7. Analysis indicated there was a greater number of stents placed in the angiography-guided group compared with the FFR group (pooled difference in means: -0.64, 95% confidence interval [CI]: -0.81 to -0.47, P < 0.001). There were no differences in the secondary outcomes between the two groups. Conclusions: Both procedures produce similar clinical outcomes, but the fewer number of stents used with FFR may have clinical as was as cost implications.
引用
收藏
页码:E25 / E36
页数:12
相关论文
共 40 条
  • [1] [Anonymous], 2018, COCHRANE HDB SYSTEMA
  • [2] [Anonymous], 2016, CLIN INVEST MED, V39
  • [3] Outcomes Associated With Fractional Flow-Guided Revascularization: A Meta-analysis
    Bavry, Anthony A.
    Elgendy, Islam Y.
    Petersen, John W.
    [J]. CLINICAL CARDIOLOGY, 2014, 37 (10) : 610 - 617
  • [4] Fractional flow reserve to determine the appropriateness of angioplasty in moderate coronary stenosis - A randomized trial
    Bech, GJW
    De Bruyne, S
    Pijls, NHJ
    de Muinck, ED
    Hoorntje, JC
    Escaned, J
    Stella, PR
    Boersma, E
    Bartunek, J
    Koolen, JJ
    Wijns, W
    [J]. CIRCULATION, 2001, 103 (24) : 2928 - 2934
  • [5] Fractional flow reserve: Critical review of an important physiologic adjunct to angiography
    Bishop, AH
    Samady, H
    [J]. AMERICAN HEART JOURNAL, 2004, 147 (05) : 792 - 802
  • [6] Meta-analysis of fractional flow reserve versus quantitative coronary angiography and noninvasive imaging for evaluation of myocardial ischemia
    Christou, Maria A. C.
    Siontis, George C. M.
    Katritsis, Demosthenes G.
    Ioannidis, John P. A.
    [J]. AMERICAN JOURNAL OF CARDIOLOGY, 2007, 99 (04) : 450 - 456
  • [7] Invasive imaging - Fractional flow reserve: a review
    De Bruyne, B.
    Sarma, J.
    [J]. HEART, 2008, 94 (07) : 949 - 959
  • [8] Fractional flow reserve in patients with prior myocardial infarction
    De Bruyne, B
    Pijls, NHJ
    Bartunek, J
    Kulecki, K
    Bech, JW
    De Winter, H
    Van Crombrugge, P
    Heyndrickx, GR
    Wijns, W
    [J]. CIRCULATION, 2001, 104 (02) : 157 - 162
  • [9] Long-term clinical outcome after fractional flow reserve- versus angio-guided percutaneous coronary intervention in patients with intermediate stenosis of coronary artery bypass grafts
    Di Serafino, Luigi
    De Bruyne, Bernard
    Mangiacapra, Fabio
    Bartunek, Jozef
    Agostoni, Pierfrancesco
    Vanderheyden, Marc
    Scognamiglio, Gabriella
    Heyndrickx, Guy R.
    Wijns, William
    Barbato, Emanuele
    [J]. AMERICAN HEART JOURNAL, 2013, 166 (01) : 110 - 118
  • [10] PROSPECTIVE CASE-CONTROL COMPARISON OF PERCUTANEOUS TRANSLUMINAL CORONARY REVASCULARIZATION IN PATIENTS WITH MULTIVESSEL DISEASE TREATED IN 1986-1987 VERSUS 1991 - IMPROVED IN-HOSPITAL AND 12-MONTH RESULTS
    ELLIS, SG
    COWLEY, MJ
    WHITLOW, PL
    VANDORMAEL, M
    LINCOFF, AM
    DISCIASCIO, G
    DEAN, LS
    TOPOL, EJ
    [J]. JOURNAL OF THE AMERICAN COLLEGE OF CARDIOLOGY, 1995, 25 (05) : 1137 - 1142