Process Evaluation of Public Project Management Performance Based on Benchmarking

被引:0
作者
Yin Yilin [1 ]
Du Yaling [2 ]
机构
[1] Tianjin Univ Technol, Sch Management, Tianjin, Peoples R China
[2] Tianjin Univ, Sch Management, Tianjin, Peoples R China
来源
2008 4TH INTERNATIONAL CONFERENCE ON WIRELESS COMMUNICATIONS, NETWORKING AND MOBILE COMPUTING, VOLS 1-31 | 2008年
关键词
public project; performance; process evaluation; benchmarking; continuous improvement;
D O I
暂无
中图分类号
TN [电子技术、通信技术];
学科分类号
0809 ;
摘要
The success of public projects roots in continuous improvement of public project management performance (PPMP), while the basis and ruler of the PPMP improvement Is effective project management performance (PMP) evaluation, so PMP evaluation has a significant impact on the improvement of PPMP, even project success. In this paper, the defects of traditional PMP evaluation are analyzed, and a solution to them is proposed, that is PPMP process evaluation model based on benchmarking. The core idea of this model Is benchmarking, and its eventual purpose is to implement process evaluation thoroughly. In this model, combination weighting Is adopted to determine the relative weights of the key performance indicators (KPIs) and fuzzy mathematics is adopted to mark the KPIs and measure the performance. The proposed model makes the evaluation of PMP dynamic, and combines performance evaluation with performance improvement closely. It is believed that PPMP process evaluation model based on benchmarking can produce continuous and effective performance improvement, and help public projects in China Into success.
引用
收藏
页码:7488 / +
页数:2
相关论文
共 12 条
[1]  
Andersen E. S., 2002, INT J PROJ MANAG, V20, P601, DOI [10.1016/S0263-7863(02)00011-X, DOI 10.1016/S0263-7863(02)00011-X]
[2]  
[长青 CHANG Qing], 2006, [中国管理科学, Chinese journal of management science], V14, P65
[3]   Group opinion aggregation based on a grading process: A method for constructing triangular fuzzy numbers [J].
Cheng, CB .
COMPUTERS & MATHEMATICS WITH APPLICATIONS, 2004, 48 (10-11) :1619-1632
[4]  
DU YL, 2008, PROJECT MANAGEMENT T, P13
[5]  
MENG XH, 2007, INT EC COOPERATE, P72
[6]  
MENG XH, 2007, CONSTRUCTION EC, P50
[7]  
*PROJ MAN I INC, 2005, GUID PROJ MAN BOD KN
[8]  
TIAN LP, 2005, HIGHER MATH
[9]  
Van Truong Luu, 2008, International Journal of Project Management, V26, P758, DOI 10.1016/j.ijproman.2007.10.002
[10]  
WANG RG, 2006, J SHENYANG JIANZHU U, V22, P173