Effectiveness of online simulation training: Measuring faculty knowledge, perceptions, and intention to adopt

被引:21
作者
Kim, Sujeong [1 ]
Park, Chang [1 ]
O'Rourke, Jennifer [2 ]
机构
[1] Univ Illinois, Coll Nursing, 845 S Damen Ave, Chicago, IL 60302 USA
[2] Loyola Univ, Marcella Niehoff Sch Nursing, Chicago, IL 60611 USA
关键词
Simulation; Faculty training; Perception; Adoption; Knowledge; Online; NURSING-EDUCATION; OUTCOMES;
D O I
10.1016/j.nedt.2016.12.022
中图分类号
G40 [教育学];
学科分类号
040101 ; 120403 ;
摘要
Background: Best practice standards of simulation recommend standardized simulation training for nursing faculty. Online training may offer an effective and more widely available alternative to in-person training. Objectives: Using the Theory of Planned Behavior, this study evaluated the effectiveness of an online simulation training program, examining faculty's foundational knowledge of simulation as well as perceptions and intention to adopt. Design: One-group pretest-posttest design. Setting: A large school of nursing with a main campus and five regional campuses in the Midwestern United States. Participants: Convenience sample of 52 faculty participants. Methods: Knowledge of foundational simulation principles was measured by pre/post-training module quizzes. Perceptions and the intention to adopt simulation were measured using the Faculty Attitudes and Intent to Use Related to the Human Patient Simulator questionnaire. Results: There was a significant improvement in faculty knowledge after training and observable improvements in attitudes. Attitudes significantly influenced the intention to adopt simulation (B = 2.54, p < 0.001). Conclusions: Online simulation training provides an effective alternative for training large numbers of nursing faculty who seek to implement best practice of standards within their institutions. (C) 2016 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.
引用
收藏
页码:102 / 107
页数:6
相关论文
共 27 条
[1]   THE THEORY OF PLANNED BEHAVIOR [J].
AJZEN, I .
ORGANIZATIONAL BEHAVIOR AND HUMAN DECISION PROCESSES, 1991, 50 (02) :179-211
[2]   Nurse Faculty Perceptions of Simulation Use in Nursing Education [J].
Akhtar-Danesh, Noori ;
Baxter, Pamela ;
Valaitis, Ruta K. ;
Stanyon, Wendy ;
Sproul, Susan .
WESTERN JOURNAL OF NURSING RESEARCH, 2009, 31 (03) :312-329
[3]  
Anderson M., 2012, Clinical Simulation in Nursing, V8, pe59, DOI DOI 10.1016/J.ECNS.2010.07.002
[4]  
[Anonymous], 2008, PATIENT SAFETY QUALI
[5]   Mobilizing Faculty for Simulation [J].
Berkowitz, Lori R. ;
Peyre, Sarah E. ;
Johnson, Natasha R. .
OBSTETRICS AND GYNECOLOGY, 2011, 118 (01) :161-163
[6]  
Blazeck A., 2011, CLIN SIMUL NURS, V7, pe57, DOI [https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ecns.2010.05.002, DOI 10.1016/J.ECNS.2010.05.002]
[7]   Simulation-based learning in nurse education: systematic review [J].
Cant, Robyn P. ;
Cooper, Simon J. .
JOURNAL OF ADVANCED NURSING, 2010, 66 (01) :3-15
[8]   Online learning for faculty development: A review of the literature [J].
Cook, David A. ;
Steinert, Yvonne .
MEDICAL TEACHER, 2013, 35 (11) :930-937
[9]   Nursing Faculty Use of High-Fidelity Human Patient Simulation in Undergraduate Nursing Education: A Mixed-Methods Study [J].
Davis, Alison H. ;
Kimble, Laura P. ;
Gunby, Susan Sweat .
JOURNAL OF NURSING EDUCATION, 2014, 53 (03) :142-150
[10]   High-Fidelity Simulation in Undergraduate Nursing Education: A Review of Simulation Reviews [J].
Doolen, Jessica ;
Mariani, Bette ;
Atz, Teresa ;
Horsley, Trisha Leann ;
Rourke, Jennifer O' ;
McAfee, Kelley ;
Cross, Chad L. .
CLINICAL SIMULATION IN NURSING, 2016, 12 (07) :290-302