On likely values of the cosmological constant

被引:89
作者
Garriga, J [1 ]
Vilenkin, A
机构
[1] Univ Autonoma Barcelona, Dept Fis, IFAE, E-08193 Barcelona, Spain
[2] Tufts Univ, Dept Phys & Astron, Inst Cosmol, Medford, MA 02155 USA
来源
PHYSICAL REVIEW D | 2000年 / 61卷 / 08期
关键词
D O I
10.1103/PhysRevD.61.083502
中图分类号
P1 [天文学];
学科分类号
0704 ;
摘要
We discuss models in which the smallness of the effective vacuum energy density rho(Lambda) and the coincidence of the time of its dominance t(Lambda) with the epoch of galaxy formation t(G) are due to anthropic selection effects. In such models. the probability distribution for rho(Lambda) is a product of an a priori distribution P-*(rho(Lambda)) and of the number density of galaxies at a given rho(Lambda) (which is proportional to the number of observers who will detect that value of rho(Lambda)). To determine P-*, we consider inflationary models in which the role of the vacuum energy is played by a slowly varying potential of some scalar field. We show that the resulting distribution depends on the shape of the potential and generally has a non-trivial dependence on rho(Lambda), even in the narrow anthropically allowed range. This is contrary to Weinberg's earlier conjecture that the a priori distribution should be nearly flat in the range of interest. We calculate the (final) probability distributions for rho(Lambda) and for t(G)/t(Lambda) in simple models with power-law potentials. For some of these models, the agreement with the observationally suggested values of rho(Lambda) is better than with a Rat a priori distribution. We also discuss a quantum-cosmological approach in which rho(Lambda) takes different values in different disconnected universes and argue that Weinberg's conjecture is not valid in this case as well. Finally, we extend our analysis to models of quintessence, with similar conclusions.
引用
收藏
页数:9
相关论文
共 39 条
[1]  
AMENDOLA L, ASTROPH9908023
[2]   Cosmological imprint of an energy component with general equation of state [J].
Caldwell, RR ;
Dave, R ;
Steinhardt, PJ .
PHYSICAL REVIEW LETTERS, 1998, 80 (08) :1582-1585
[3]   Quintessence, the gravitational constant, and gravity [J].
Chiba, T .
PHYSICAL REVIEW D, 1999, 60 (08)
[4]   WHY THERE IS NOTHING RATHER THAN SOMETHING - A THEORY OF THE COSMOLOGICAL CONSTANT [J].
COLEMAN, S .
NUCLEAR PHYSICS B, 1988, 310 (3-4) :643-668
[5]   WHY IS THE COSMOLOGICAL CONSTANT SO SMALL [J].
DAVIES, PCW ;
UNWIN, SD .
PROCEEDINGS OF THE ROYAL SOCIETY OF LONDON SERIES A-MATHEMATICAL PHYSICAL AND ENGINEERING SCIENCES, 1981, 377 (1769) :147-149
[6]   AN ANTHROPIC ARGUMENT FOR A COSMOLOGICAL CONSTANT [J].
EFSTATHIOU, G .
MONTHLY NOTICES OF THE ROYAL ASTRONOMICAL SOCIETY, 1995, 274 (04) :L73-L76
[7]   STATIONARITY OF INFLATION AND PREDICTIONS OF QUANTUM COSMOLOGY [J].
GARCIABELLIDO, J ;
LINDE, A .
PHYSICAL REVIEW D, 1995, 51 (02) :429-443
[8]   Recycling universe [J].
Garriga, J ;
Vilenkin, A .
PHYSICAL REVIEW D, 1998, 57 (04) :2230-2244
[9]   Density parameter and the anthropic principle [J].
Garriga, J ;
Tanaka, T ;
Vilenkin, E .
PHYSICAL REVIEW D, 1999, 60 (02)
[10]   WAVEFUNCTION OF THE UNIVERSE [J].
HARTLE, JB ;
HAWKING, SW .
PHYSICAL REVIEW D, 1983, 28 (12) :2960-2975