The Asian rejection?:: International refugee law in Asia

被引:24
作者
Davies, Sara E. [1 ]
机构
[1] Queensland Univ Technol, Sch Justice Studies, St Lucia, Qld, Australia
关键词
D O I
10.1111/j.1467-8497.2006.00433a.x
中图分类号
K [历史、地理];
学科分类号
06 ;
摘要
The majority of Asian states have not signed onto the major international refugee law instruments which promote refugee recognition and protection. Yet, second to Africa, the Asian region has had the highest number of refugees since the Second World War. Three explanations are usually offered to explain this puzzle- "goodneighbourliness", "economic costs" and "social disruption". In this article I argue that each is flawed in important ways and then develop an alternative by explaining how limited Asian involvement in the drafting of international refugee law has led Asian states to reject Eurocentric refugee recognition practices.
引用
收藏
页码:562 / 575
页数:14
相关论文
共 51 条
[1]  
Acharya Amitav., 2000, QUEST IDENTITY INT R
[2]  
AFOLAYAN AA, 2001, INT MIGR, V39, P17
[3]  
Alexander M., 1999, INT J REFUG LAW, V11, P251
[4]  
[Anonymous], 2001, The Politics of Justice and Human Rights
[5]  
[Anonymous], FORCED MIGRATION REV
[6]  
[Anonymous], 2003, UNAUTHORIZED MIGRATI
[7]  
BANERJEE PK, 1956, COMMUNICATION 0811
[8]  
Barr M. D., 2002, Cultural politics and Asian values: The tepid war
[9]  
CASTLES S, 2001, INT MIGRATION 21ST C
[10]  
Chimni B.S., 1998, journal of Refugee Studies, V11, P350, DOI [DOI 10.1093/JRS/11.4.350-A, 10.1093/jrs/11.4.350-a]