Memory encoding of syntactic information involves domain-general attentional resources: Evidence from dual-task studies

被引:5
作者
Heyselaar, Evelien [1 ]
Segaert, Katrien [2 ]
机构
[1] Max Planck Inst Psycholinguist, Neurobiol Language Dept, Wundtlaan 1, NL-6525 XD Nijmegen, Netherlands
[2] Univ Birmingham, Sch Psychol, Birmingham, W Midlands, England
关键词
Dual task; attentional resources; language; syntactic priming; MOT; PERCEPTUAL LOAD; LANGUAGE; INTERFERENCE; COMPREHENSION; SELECTION; BOOST; MODEL;
D O I
10.1177/1747021818801249
中图分类号
B84 [心理学];
学科分类号
04 ; 0402 ;
摘要
We investigate the type of attention (domain-general or language-specific) used during syntactic processing. We focus on syntactic priming: In this task, participants listen to a sentence that describes a picture (prime sentence), followed by a picture the participants need to describe (target sentence). We measure the proportion of times participants use the syntactic structure they heard in the prime sentence to describe the current target sentence as a measure of syntactic processing. Participants simultaneously conducted a motion-object tracking (MOT) task, a task commonly used to tax domain-general attentional resources. We manipulated the number of objects the participant had to track; we thus measured participants' ability to process syntax while their attention is not taxed, slightly taxed, or overly taxed. Performance in the MOT task was significantly worse when conducted as a dual task compared with as a single task. We observed an inverted U-shaped curve on priming magnitude when conducting the MOT task concurrently with prime sentences (i.e., memory encoding), but no effect when conducted with target sentences (i.e., memory retrieval). Our results illustrate how, during the encoding of syntactic information, domain-general attention differentially affects syntactic processing, whereas during the retrieval of syntactic information, domain-general attention does not influence syntactic processing.
引用
收藏
页码:1285 / 1296
页数:12
相关论文
共 52 条
  • [1] Attention and expertise in multiple target tracking
    Allen, R
    McGeorge, P
    Pearson, D
    Milne, AB
    [J]. APPLIED COGNITIVE PSYCHOLOGY, 2004, 18 (03) : 337 - 347
  • [2] Audiovisual integration of speech falters under high attention demands
    Alsius, A
    Navarra, J
    Campbell, R
    Soto-Faraco, S
    [J]. CURRENT BIOLOGY, 2005, 15 (09) : 839 - 843
  • [3] Incremental interpretation at verbs: restricting the domain of subsequent reference
    Altmann, GTM
    Kamide, Y
    [J]. COGNITION, 1999, 73 (03) : 247 - 264
  • [4] [Anonymous], 1980, Attention and performance VIII
  • [5] Random effects structure for confirmatory hypothesis testing: Keep it maximal
    Barr, Dale J.
    Levy, Roger
    Scheepers, Christoph
    Tily, Harry J.
    [J]. JOURNAL OF MEMORY AND LANGUAGE, 2013, 68 (03) : 255 - 278
  • [6] Fitting Linear Mixed-Effects Models Using lme4
    Bates, Douglas
    Maechler, Martin
    Bolker, Benjamin M.
    Walker, Steven C.
    [J]. JOURNAL OF STATISTICAL SOFTWARE, 2015, 67 (01): : 1 - 48
  • [7] SYNTACTIC PERSISTENCE IN LANGUAGE PRODUCTION
    BOCK, JK
    [J]. COGNITIVE PSYCHOLOGY, 1986, 18 (03) : 355 - 387
  • [8] FROM CONCEPTUAL ROLES TO STRUCTURAL RELATIONS - BRIDGING THE SYNTACTIC CLEFT
    BOCK, K
    LOEBELL, H
    MOREY, R
    [J]. PSYCHOLOGICAL REVIEW, 1992, 99 (01) : 150 - 171
  • [9] Bock K, 2007, ADV BEHAV BRAIN SCI, P21
  • [10] A general factor involved in dual-task performance decrement
    Bourke, PA
    Duncan, J
    NimmoSmith, I
    [J]. QUARTERLY JOURNAL OF EXPERIMENTAL PSYCHOLOGY SECTION A-HUMAN EXPERIMENTAL PSYCHOLOGY, 1996, 49 (03): : 525 - 545