Radiation risks potentially associated with low-dose CT screening of adult smokers for lung cancer

被引:338
作者
Brenner, DJ [1 ]
机构
[1] Columbia Univ, Ctr Radiol Res, New York, NY 10032 USA
关键词
cancer screening; computed tomography (CT); radiation exposure; lung; effects of irradiation on; special reports;
D O I
10.1148/radiol.2312030880
中图分类号
R8 [特种医学]; R445 [影像诊断学];
学科分类号
1002 ; 100207 ; 1009 ;
摘要
PURPOSE: To estimate the radiation-related lung cancer risks associated with annual low-dose computed tomographic (CT) lung screening in adult smokers and former smokers, and to establish a baseline risk that the potential benefits of such screening should exceed. MATERIALS AND METHODS: The estimated lung radiation dose from low-dose CT lung examinations corresponds to a dose range for which there is direct evidence of increased cancer risk in atomic bomb survivors. Estimated dose-, sex-, and smoking status-dependent excess relative risks of lung cancer were derived from cancer incidence data for atomic bomb survivors and used to calculate the excess lung cancer risks associated with a single CT lung examination at a given age in a U.S. population. From these, the overall radiation risks associated with annual CT lung screening were estimated. RESULTS: A 50-year-old female smoker who undergoes annual CT lung screening until age 75 would incur an estimated radiation-related lung cancer risk of 0.85%, in addition to her otherwise expected lung cancer risk of approximately 17%. The radiation-associated cancer risk to other organs would be far lower. If 50% of all current and former smokers in the U.S. population aged 50-75 years received annual CT screening, the estimated number of lung cancers associated with radiation from screening would be approximately 36,000, a 1.8% (95% credibility interval: 0.5%, 5.5%) increase over the otherwise expected number. CONCLUSION: Given the estimated upper limit of a 5.5% increase in lung cancer risk attributable to annual CT-related radiation exposure, a mortality benefit of considerably more than 5% may be necessary to outweigh the potential radiation risks. (C) RSNA, 2004.
引用
收藏
页码:440 / 445
页数:6
相关论文
共 50 条
[1]   A consensus statement of the society of thoracic radiology - Screening for lung cancer with helical computed tomography [J].
Aberle, DR ;
Gamsu, G ;
Henschke, CI ;
Naidich, DP ;
Swensen, SJ .
JOURNAL OF THORACIC IMAGING, 2001, 16 (01) :65-68
[2]  
[Anonymous], 2000, REPORT GEN ASSEMBLY
[3]  
Arias Elizabeth, 2002, Natl Vital Stat Rep, V51, P1
[4]   Screening for lung cancer - The guidelines [J].
Bach, PB ;
Niewoehner, DE ;
Black, WC .
CHEST, 2003, 123 (01) :83S-88S
[5]   Routine screening mammography: how important is the radiation-risk side of the benefit-risk equation? [J].
Brenner, DJ ;
Sawant, SG ;
Hande, MP ;
Miller, RC ;
Elliston, CD ;
Fu, Z ;
Randers-Pehrson, G ;
Marino, SA .
INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF RADIATION BIOLOGY, 2002, 78 (12) :1065-1067
[6]   Effects of smoking and radiotherapy on lung carcinoma in breast carcinoma survivors [J].
Ford, MB ;
Sigurdson, AJ ;
Petrulis, ES ;
Ng, CS ;
Kemp, B ;
Cooksley, C ;
McNeese, M ;
Selwyn, BJ ;
Spitz, MR ;
Bondy, ML .
CANCER, 2003, 98 (07) :1457-1464
[7]   Randomized controlled trial with low-dose spiral CT for lung cancer screening: Feasibility study and preliminary results [J].
Garg, K ;
Keith, RL ;
Byers, T ;
Kelly, K ;
Kerzner, AL ;
Lynch, DA ;
Miller, YE .
RADIOLOGY, 2002, 225 (02) :506-510
[8]  
Gilbert ES, 2003, RADIAT RES, V159, P161, DOI 10.1667/0033-7587(2003)159[0161:LCATFH]2.0.CO
[9]  
2
[10]  
Henschke CI, 2002, CANCER J, V8, pS47