Risk Assessment of Hip Fracture Based on Machine Learning

被引:14
作者
Galassi, Alessio [1 ]
Martin-Guerrero, Jose D. [1 ]
Villamor, Eduardo [2 ]
Monserrat, Carlos [3 ]
Ruperez, Maria Jose [2 ]
机构
[1] Univ Valencia, ETSE UV, Dept Elect Engn, Intelligent Data Anal Lab IDAL, Avinguda Univ S-N, Valencia 46100, Spain
[2] Univ Politecn Valencia, Ctr Invest Ingn Mecan CIIM, Camino Vera S-N, Valencia 46022, Spain
[3] Univ Politecn Valencia, VRAIN, Camino Vera S-N, Valencia 46022, Spain
关键词
FINITE-ELEMENT-ANALYSIS; TRABECULAR BONE; PREDICTION; STRENGTH; DENSITY; TISSUES; MODELS; WOMEN;
D O I
10.1155/2020/8880786
中图分类号
R318 [生物医学工程];
学科分类号
0831 ;
摘要
Identifying patients with high risk of hip fracture is a great challenge in osteoporosis clinical assessment. Bone Mineral Density (BMD) measured by Dual-Energy X-Ray Absorptiometry (DXA) is the current gold standard in osteoporosis clinical assessment. However, its classification accuracy is only around 65%. In order to improve this accuracy, this paper proposes the use of Machine Learning (ML) models trained with data from a biomechanical model that simulates a sideways-fall. Machine Learning (ML) models are models able to learn and to make predictions from data. During a training process, ML models learn a function that maps inputs and outputs without previous knowledge of the problem. The main advantage of ML models is that once the mapping function is constructed, they can make predictions for complex biomechanical behaviours in real time. However, despite the increasing popularity of Machine Learning (ML) models and their wide application to many fields of medicine, their use as hip fracture predictors is still limited. This paper proposes the use of ML models to assess and predict hip fracture risk. Clinical, geometric, and biomechanical variables from the finite element simulation of a side fall are used as independent variables to train the models. Among the different tested models, Random Forest stands out, showing its capability to outperform BMD-DXA, achieving an accuracy over 87%, with specificity over 92% and sensitivity over 83%.
引用
收藏
页数:13
相关论文
共 41 条
[1]  
[Anonymous], 1994, World Health Organ Tech Rep Ser, V843, P1
[2]   Comparison of the elastic and yield properties of human femoral trabecular and cortical bone tissue [J].
Bayraktar, HH ;
Morgan, EF ;
Niebur, GL ;
Morris, GE ;
Wong, EK ;
Keaveny, TM .
JOURNAL OF BIOMECHANICS, 2004, 37 (01) :27-35
[3]   Evaluation of the FRAX and Garvan Fracture Risk Calculators in Older Women [J].
Bolland, Mark J. ;
Siu, Amanda T. Y. ;
Mason, Barbara H. ;
Horne, Anne M. ;
Ames, Ruth W. ;
Grey, Andrew B. ;
Gamble, Greg D. ;
Reid, Ian R. .
JOURNAL OF BONE AND MINERAL RESEARCH, 2011, 26 (02) :420-427
[4]   Effects of hip abductor muscle forces and knee boundary conditions on femoral neck stresses during simulated falls [J].
Choi, W. J. ;
Cripton, P. A. ;
Robinovitch, S. N. .
OSTEOPOROSIS INTERNATIONAL, 2015, 26 (01) :291-301
[5]   HIP-FRACTURES IN THE ELDERLY - A WORLDWIDE PROJECTION [J].
COOPER, C ;
CAMPION, G ;
MELTON, LJ .
OSTEOPOROSIS INTERNATIONAL, 1992, 2 (06) :285-289
[6]   Experimental validation of DXA-based finite element models for prediction of femoral strength [J].
Dall'Ara, E. ;
Eastell, R. ;
Viceconti, M. ;
Pahr, D. ;
Yang, L. .
JOURNAL OF THE MECHANICAL BEHAVIOR OF BIOMEDICAL MATERIALS, 2016, 63 :17-25
[7]  
Davenport Thomas, 2019, Future Healthc J, V6, P94, DOI 10.7861/futurehosp.6-2-94
[8]   The factor-of-risk biomechanical approach predicts hip fracture in men and women: the Framingham Study [J].
Dufour, A. B. ;
Roberts, B. ;
Broe, K. E. ;
Kiel, D. P. ;
Bouxsein, M. L. ;
Hannan, M. T. .
OSTEOPOROSIS INTERNATIONAL, 2012, 23 (02) :513-520
[9]   Reproducibility and side differences of mechanical tests for determining the structural strength of the proximal femur [J].
Eckstein, F ;
Wunderer, C ;
Boehm, H ;
Kuhn, V ;
Priemel, M ;
Link, TM ;
Lochmüller, EM .
JOURNAL OF BONE AND MINERAL RESEARCH, 2004, 19 (03) :379-385
[10]   DXA scanning in clinical practice [J].
El Maghraoui, A. ;
Roux, C. .
QJM-AN INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF MEDICINE, 2008, 101 (08) :605-617