SecurAstaP trial: securement with SecurAcath versus StatLock for peripherally inserted central catheters, a randomised open trial

被引:25
作者
Goossens, Godelieve Alice [1 ,2 ]
Grumiaux, Niel [3 ]
Janssens, Christel [1 ]
Jerome, Martine [1 ]
Fieuws, Steffen [4 ,5 ]
Moons, Philip [2 ,6 ]
Stas, Marguerite [7 ]
Maleux, Geert [8 ]
机构
[1] Univ Hosp Leuven, Nursing Ctr Excellence, Leuven, Belgium
[2] Katholieke Univ Leuven, Dept Publ Hlth & Primary Care, Leuven, Belgium
[3] Univ Hosp Leuven, Dept Nephrol, Leuven, Belgium
[4] Katholieke Univ Leuven, Interuniv Ctr Biostat & Stat Bioinformat, Leuven, Belgium
[5] Univ Hasselt, Leuven, Belgium
[6] Univ Gothenburg, Inst Hlth & Care Sci, Gothenburg, Sweden
[7] Univ Hosp Leuven, Surg Oncol, Leuven, Belgium
[8] Univ Hosp Leuven, Intervent Radiol, Leuven, Belgium
关键词
COMPLICATIONS; INFECTION; SYSTEM;
D O I
10.1136/bmjopen-2017-016058
中图分类号
R5 [内科学];
学科分类号
1002 ; 100201 ;
摘要
Objectives To assess the effect on needed nursing time for dressing change. Design, setting, participants A parallel-group, openlabel, randomised controlled trial in patients who are in need for a peripherally inserted central catheter insertion in one teaching hospital in Belgium. The follow-up lasted 180 days or until catheter removal, whatever came first. A computer generated table was used to allocate devices. Randomised patients were 105 adults (StatLock, n=53; SecurAcath, n=52) and primary analysis was based on all patients (n=92) with time measurements (StatLock, n=43; SecurAcath, n=49). Interventions StatLock which has to be changed weekly versus SecurAcath which could remain in place for the complete catheter dwell time. Main outcome measure Needed time for the dressing change at each dressing change (SecurAcath) or at each dressing change combined with the change of the securement device (StatLock). Results Median time needed for dressing change was 7.3 min (95% CI 6.4 min to 8.3 min) in the StatLock group and in the SecurAcath group 4.3 min (95% CI 3.8 min to 4.9 min) (P<0.0001). The time in the SecurAcath group was reduced with 41% (95% CI 29% to 51%). Incidence rates of migration, dislodgement and catheter-related bloodstream infection were comparable across groups. Pain scores were higher with SecurAcath than with StatLock at insertion (P=0.02) and at removal (P<0.001) and comparable during dressing change (P=0.38) and during dwell time (P=0.995). User-friendliness was scored at insertion and removal. All statements regarding the user-friendliness were scored significantly higher for StatLock than for SecurAcath (P<0.05). Only for the statement regarding the recommending routine use of the device, which was asked at removal, no difference was found between the two devices (P=0.32). Conclusion Use of SecurAcath saves time during dressing change compared with StatLock. Training on correct placement and removal of SecurAcath is critical to minimise pain.
引用
收藏
页数:10
相关论文
共 9 条
[1]   A Prospective Postmarket Study to Evaluate the Safety and Efficacy of a New Peripherally Inserted Central Catheter Stabilization System [J].
Egan, Gail M. ;
Siskin, Gary P. ;
Weinmann, Robert, IV ;
Galloway, Margy M. .
JOURNAL OF INFUSION NURSING, 2013, 36 (03) :181-188
[2]  
Elen Hughes M., 2014, BR J NURS, V23, P12
[3]   CDC/NHSN surveillance definition of health care-associated infection and criteria for specific types of infections in the acute care setting [J].
Horan, Teresa C. ;
Andrus, Mary ;
Dudeck, Margaret A. .
AMERICAN JOURNAL OF INFECTION CONTROL, 2008, 36 (05) :309-332
[4]   Can Real Time Location System Technology (RTLS) Provide Useful Estimates of Time Use by Nursing Personnel? [J].
Jones, Terry L. ;
Schlegel, Cara .
RESEARCH IN NURSING & HEALTH, 2014, 37 (01) :75-84
[5]  
Macklin D., 2015, Journal of the Association for Vascular Access, V20, P45, DOI [10.1016/j.java.2014.10.011, DOI 10.1016/J.JAVA.2014.10.011]
[6]   Evaluation of PICC complications in orthopedic inpatients with bone infection for long-term intravenous antibiotics therapy [J].
Schneider, Laura Valbousquet, Jr. ;
Duron, Sandrine ;
Arnaud, Francois-Xavier ;
Bousquet, Aurore ;
Kervella, Yann ;
Bouzad, Caroline ;
Baccialone, Jacques ;
A'Teriitehau, Christophe ;
Potet, Julien .
JOURNAL OF VASCULAR ACCESS, 2015, 16 (04) :299-308
[7]   Dressing and securement for central venous access devices (CVADs): A Cochrane systematic review [J].
Ullman, Amanda J. ;
Cooke, Marie L. ;
Mitchell, Marion ;
Lin, Frances ;
New, Karen ;
Long, Debbie A. ;
Mihala, Gabor ;
Rickard, Claire M. .
INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF NURSING STUDIES, 2016, 59 :177-196
[8]   Evaluation of the Use of a Stabilization Device to Improve the Quality of Care in Patients With Peripherally Inserted Central Catheters [J].
Waterhouse, Jennifer ;
Bandisode, Varsha ;
Brandon, Debra ;
Olson, Meredith ;
Docherty, Sharron L. .
AACN ADVANCED CRITICAL CARE, 2014, 25 (03) :213-220
[9]   Sutureless securement device reduces complications of peripherally inserted central venous catheters [J].
Yamamoto, AJ ;
Solomon, JA ;
Soulen, MC ;
Tang, J ;
Parkinson, K ;
Lin, R ;
Schears, GJ .
JOURNAL OF VASCULAR AND INTERVENTIONAL RADIOLOGY, 2002, 13 (01) :77-81