The Effects of Different Anesthetic Agents on Short Electroretinography Protocol in Dogs

被引:26
|
作者
Lin, Shiun-Long [1 ,2 ]
Shiu, Wei-Cheng [1 ]
Liu, Pan-Chen [1 ,2 ]
Cheng, Feng-Pang [1 ,2 ]
Lin, Yung-Chang [1 ]
Wang, Way-Shyan [1 ]
机构
[1] Natl Chung Hsing Univ, Dept Vet Med, Coll Vet Med, Taichung 402, Taiwan
[2] Natl Chung Hsing Univ, Vet Teaching Hosp, Coll Vet Med, Taichung 402, Taiwan
来源
JOURNAL OF VETERINARY MEDICAL SCIENCE | 2009年 / 71卷 / 06期
关键词
electroretinogram; isoflurane; medetomidine; tiletamine-zolazepam; MEDETOMIDINE; TELAZOL; RETINA;
D O I
10.1292/jvms.71.763
中图分类号
S85 [动物医学(兽医学)];
学科分类号
0906 ;
摘要
The purpose of this article was to investigate the effects of sedatives and general anesthetics, such as tiletamine-zolazepam, medetomidine, and isoflurane oil the short ERG protocol. Six healthy mongrel dogs were assessed by a convenient short ERG protocol with the owners' consent. The amplitudes of a-wave and b-wave, as well as the implicit time of ERG under different anesthesia statuses, were recorded and analyzed. The amplitudes of ERG waves were not significantly different between tiletamine-zolazepam and medetomidine groups, except in b-wave after 5 min dark adaptation (140 +/- 42 mu V in tiletamine-zolazepam and 101 +/- 32 mu V in medetomidine, p<0.01). The amplitude of ERG recorded in isoflurane (5 +/- 3 mu Vof a-wave and 12 +/- 6 mu V of b-wave under light adaptation; 41 +/- 19 mu V of b-wave after 1 min dark adaptation; 28 +/- 15 of a-wave and 58 +/- 32 /N of b-wave after 5 min dark adaptation) were significantly different from tiletarnine-zolazepain (8 +/- 2 mu V of a-wave and 24 +/- 9 mu V of b-wave under light adaptation; 117 +/- 44 mu V of b-wave after I min dark adaptation; 59 18 IN of a-wave and 140 42 IN of b-wave after 5 min dark adaptation), except in a-wave after I min dark adaptation (39 +/- 13 mu V in tiletamine-zolazepam and 34 +/- 17 mu V in isoflurane). Comment-General anesthesia had significantly lower amplitudes in the dark-adapted group compared with the sedation group. Therefore, tiletamine-zolazepam is a desirable choice for the short ERG protocol in dogs.
引用
收藏
页码:763 / 768
页数:6
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [1] Evaluation of different anesthetic agents in dogs
    Kilic, S
    Isler, CT
    INDIAN VETERINARY JOURNAL, 2005, 82 (06): : 621 - 624
  • [2] EFFECTS OF ANESTHETIC AGENTS ON AUTOREGULATION IN DOGS AND RATS
    BURKE, TJ
    CONGER, JD
    CLINICAL RESEARCH, 1975, 23 (03): : A357 - A357
  • [3] INFLUENCE OF DIFFERENT ANESTHETIC AGENTS ON THE RELEASE OF CHOLECYSTOKININ IN DOGS
    LILJA, P
    WIENER, I
    INOUE, K
    PRIANO, LL
    GREELEY, GH
    THOMPSON, JC
    SURGERY, 1985, 97 (04) : 415 - 419
  • [4] EFFECTS OF ANESTHETIC AGENTS ON HEPATIC STRUCTURE AND FUNCTION IN DOGS
    GREEN, HD
    NGAI, SH
    SULAK, MH
    CROW, JB
    SLOCUM, HC
    ANESTHESIOLOGY, 1959, 20 (06) : 776 - 784
  • [5] COMPARISON OF THE EFFECTS OF DIFFERENT ANESTHETIC AGENTS ON RATS
    RUSSELLJONES, CG
    MARTIN, G
    COLUS, P
    ANAESTHESIA AND INTENSIVE CARE, 1981, 9 (01) : 87 - 88
  • [6] In vivo effects of different anesthetic agents on apoptosis
    Osman, Emad S.
    Khafagy, Hanan F.
    Samhan, Yasser M.
    Hassan, Mona M.
    El-Shanawany, Faten M.
    Fathallah, Abdel Rahman M.
    El-Fandy, Gehan G.
    KOREAN JOURNAL OF ANESTHESIOLOGY, 2012, 63 (01) : 18 - 24
  • [7] EVALUATION OF PROPANIDID IN COMBINATION WITH DIFFERENT PRE-ANESTHETIC AGENTS IN DOGS
    JANI, BM
    PATEL, GR
    MANNARI, MN
    INDIAN VETERINARY JOURNAL, 1982, 59 (10): : 773 - 776
  • [8] EFFECTS OF INTRAVENOUS ANESTHETIC AGENTS ON LEFT-VENTRICULAR FUNCTION IN DOGS
    HORWITZ, LD
    AMERICAN JOURNAL OF PHYSIOLOGY, 1977, 232 (01): : H44 - H48
  • [9] COMPARISON OF EFFECTS OF 2 ANESTHETIC AGENTS ON PRODUCTION OF HYPOXIC PULMONARY HYPERTENSION IN DOGS
    SUSMANO, A
    CARLETON, RA
    PASSOVOY, M
    AMERICAN HEART JOURNAL, 1972, 84 (02) : 203 - &
  • [10] Effects of various anesthetic agents on laryngeal motion during laryngoscopy in normal dogs
    Jackson, AM
    Tobias, K
    Long, C
    Bartges, J
    Harvey, R
    VETERINARY SURGERY, 2004, 33 (02) : 102 - 106