How Stereotype Threat Affects Healthy Older Adults' Performance on Clinical Assessments of Cognitive Decline: The Key Role of Regulatory Fit

被引:53
作者
Barber, Sarah J. [1 ]
Mather, Mara [2 ]
Gatz, Margaret [3 ]
机构
[1] San Francisco State Univ, Dept Psychol, San Francisco, CA 94132 USA
[2] Univ So Calif, Davis Sch Gerontol, Los Angeles, CA USA
[3] Univ So Calif, Dept Psychol, Los Angeles, CA 90089 USA
来源
JOURNALS OF GERONTOLOGY SERIES B-PSYCHOLOGICAL SCIENCES AND SOCIAL SCIENCES | 2015年 / 70卷 / 06期
关键词
Aging; Memory; Stereotype threat; Regulatory focus; Regulatory fit; MINI-MENTAL-STATE; PRIMARY-CARE; MEMORY PERFORMANCE; ALZHEIMERS-DISEASE; DIAGNOSIS THREAT; HEAD-INJURY; DEMENTIA; AGE; IDENTIFICATION; EXPECTATIONS;
D O I
10.1093/geronb/gbv009
中图分类号
R592 [老年病学]; C [社会科学总论];
学科分类号
03 ; 0303 ; 100203 ;
摘要
Stereotype threat can impair older adults' performance on clinical assessments for cognitive decline. We examined why this occurs. Based upon the regulatory focus account of stereotype threat, we predicted that the effects of stereotype threat should depend upon the assessments' reward structure. Stereotype threat should be associated with poor performance when the assessment emphasizes gaining correct answers, but not when it emphasizes avoiding mistakes. Healthy older adults completed a series of mental status examinations. Half of the participants completed these examinations under stereotype threat about their cognitive abilities. Monetary incentives were also manipulated. For half of the participants correct responding led to gains. For the remaining participants incorrect responding/forgetting led to losses. Consistent with the regulatory focus account, stereotype threat was associated with poor performance when the mental status examinations had a gains-based structure, but not when they had a losses-based structure. Older adults respond to stereotype threat by becoming vigilant to avoid the losses that will make them their worst. Researchers and clinicians can capitalize on this motivational change to combat stereotype threat's negative effects. By using a loss-avoidance frame, stereotype threat's negative effects can be attenuated or even eliminated.
引用
收藏
页码:891 / 900
页数:10
相关论文
共 36 条
[1]   An age apart: The effects of intergenerational contact and stereotype threat on performance and intergroup bias [J].
Abrams, Dominic ;
Eller, Anja ;
Bryant, Jacqueline .
PSYCHOLOGY AND AGING, 2006, 21 (04) :691-702
[2]  
[Anonymous], 2012, PROCESS VERSAT UNPUB
[3]  
Barber S.J., 2014, The Oxford handbook of emotion, social cognition, and everyday problem solving during adulthood, P302, DOI DOI 10.1093/OXFORDHB/9780199899463.013.008
[4]   Stereotype Threat Can Both Enhance and Impair Older Adults' Memory [J].
Barber, Sarah J. ;
Mather, Mara .
PSYCHOLOGICAL SCIENCE, 2013, 24 (12) :2522-2529
[5]   Stereotype threat can reduce older adults' memory errors [J].
Barber, Sarah J. ;
Mather, Mara .
QUARTERLY JOURNAL OF EXPERIMENTAL PSYCHOLOGY, 2013, 66 (10) :1888-1895
[6]   Improving identification of cognitive impairment in primary care [J].
Borson, S ;
Scanlan, JM ;
Watanabe, J ;
Tu, SP ;
Lessig, M .
INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF GERIATRIC PSYCHIATRY, 2006, 21 (04) :349-355
[7]   Screening for dementia in primary care: A summary of the evidence for the US Preventive Services Task Force [J].
Boustani, M ;
Peterson, B ;
Hanson, L ;
Harris, R ;
Lohr, KN .
ANNALS OF INTERNAL MEDICINE, 2003, 138 (11) :927-937
[8]   When avoiding failure improves performance: Stereotype threat and the impact of performance goals [J].
Chalabaev, Aina ;
Major, Brenda ;
Sarrazin, Philippe ;
Cury, Francois .
MOTIVATION AND EMOTION, 2012, 36 (02) :130-142
[9]   How feelings of stereotype threat influence older adults' memory performance [J].
Chasteen, AL ;
Bhattacharyya, S ;
Horhota, M ;
Tam, R ;
Hasher, L .
EXPERIMENTAL AGING RESEARCH, 2005, 31 (03) :235-260
[10]   Physician recognition of cognitive impairment: Evaluating the need for improvement [J].
Chodosh, J ;
Petitti, DB ;
Elliott, M ;
Hays, RD ;
Crooks, VC ;
Reuben, DB ;
Buckwalter, JG ;
Wenger, N .
JOURNAL OF THE AMERICAN GERIATRICS SOCIETY, 2004, 52 (07) :1051-1059