Microanalysis of 9-12% chromium steels P92 and P122

被引:0
作者
Hättestrand, M [1 ]
Schwind, M [1 ]
Andrén, HO [1 ]
机构
[1] Chalmers Univ Technol, Dept Phys, SE-41296 Gothenburg, Sweden
来源
ADVANCED HEAT RESISTANT STEELS FOR POWER GENERATION | 1999年
关键词
D O I
暂无
中图分类号
TE [石油、天然气工业]; TK [能源与动力工程];
学科分类号
0807 ; 0820 ;
摘要
The 9-12% chromium steels P122 and P92 have been investigated using atom probe field ion microscopy (APFIM) and transmission electron microscopy (TEM). The two steels are similar in composition with the exception of an addition of copper to P122, allowing a higher chromium content. The investigated materials were tempered at 770 degrees C and isothermally aged at 600 degrees C for times ranging from 0 to 10 000 h. The matrix and precipitates of type M23C6, MX and Laves phase have been analysed with APFIM. Steel P122 contains 0.9% copper and it was found that the matrix concentration of copper drops during ageing from 0.4% to an equilibrium level at about 0.1%. No copper was found in M23C6, MX or Laves phase. Instead copper forms a separate phase, that was identified by TEM. During ageing the amount of tungsten in the matrix drops due to formation of Laves phase. This process is faster in steel P122 compared to steel P92, indicating an accelerating effect of copper on the nucleation of Laves phase. In both steels, enhanced concentrations of boron were found inside M23C6 carbides. Phosphorous was found to segregate to a very narrow region at the carbide/matrix interface. The role of different alloying elements in the two steels is discussed.
引用
收藏
页码:199 / 211
页数:13
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [31] Analysis on Creep Behaviors at High Temperature and Fracture Morphology of P92 Steels
    Yuan, Jun
    Xu, Hong
    Wang, Xiao
    Yu, Yang
    Mao, Xueping
    Hu, Suyang
    [J]. MATERIAL DESIGN, PROCESSING AND APPLICATIONS, PARTS 1-4, 2013, 690-693 : 1757 - 1761
  • [32] Performance of modern high strength steels (P91, P92) in high temperature plant
    Shibli, Ahmed
    [J]. PROCEEDINGS OF THE ASME PRESSURE VESSELS AND PIPING CONFERENCE 2007, VOL 9, 2008, : 161 - 170
  • [33] CREEP PROPERTIES OF STEEL P92
    Vlasak, Tomas
    Hakl, Jan
    Kasl, Josef
    Cmakal, Josef
    [J]. METAL 2010: 19TH INTERNATIONAL METALLURGICAL AND MATERIALS CONFERENCE, 2010, : 398 - 402
  • [34] Alloy compositions and mechanical properties of 9-12% chromium steels with martensitic - austenitic microstructure
    Klotz, UE
    Solenthaler, C
    Ernst, P
    Uggowitzer, PJ
    Speidel, MO
    [J]. MATERIALS SCIENCE AND ENGINEERING A-STRUCTURAL MATERIALS PROPERTIES MICROSTRUCTURE AND PROCESSING, 1999, 272 (02): : 292 - 299
  • [35] Mechanism for beneficial effect of boron addition on creep resistance of 9-12% chromium steels
    Golpayegani, Ardeshir
    Andren, Hans-Olof
    [J]. Solid-Solid Phase Transformations in Inorganic Materials 2005, Vol 1, 2005, : 461 - 466
  • [36] Assessment of creep rupture strength for the new martensitic 9% Cr steels E911 and T/P92
    Bendick, Walter
    Gabrel, Jean
    [J]. MATERIALS AT HIGH TEMPERATURES, 2008, 25 (03) : 139 - 148
  • [37] CREEP RESISTANT HIGH BORON 9-12% CHROMIUM STEELS FOR STEAM POWER PLANTS
    Andren, Hans-Olof
    Golpayegani, Ardeshir
    [J]. NEW DEVELOPMENTS ON METALLURGY AND APPLICATIONS OF HIGH STRENGTH STEELS: BUENOS AIRES 2008, VOLS 1 AND 2, PROCEEDINGS,, 2008, : 265 - 271
  • [38] A new methodology for analysis of creep and creep fracture data for 9-12% chromium steels
    Wilshire, B.
    Scharning, P. J.
    [J]. INTERNATIONAL MATERIALS REVIEWS, 2008, 53 (02) : 91 - 104
  • [39] Effect of PWHT on metallurgical and mechanical characterization of dissimilar welded joint of P91 and P92 steels
    Mehdi, Husain
    Singh, Brijesh
    Salah, A. Nait
    Dubey, Madhur Kumar
    Mishra, Subhash
    Kumar, Shailendra
    [J]. JOURNAL OF ADHESION SCIENCE AND TECHNOLOGY, 2024, 38 (09) : 1395 - 1412
  • [40] Cross-Weld Creep Comparison of Power Plant Steels CrMoV, P91 and P92
    Tanner, David W. J.
    Sun, Wei
    Hyde, Thomas H.
    [J]. JOURNAL OF PRESSURE VESSEL TECHNOLOGY-TRANSACTIONS OF THE ASME, 2013, 135 (02):