The artificial urinary sphincter and male sling for postprostatectomy incontinence: Which patient should get which procedure?

被引:54
|
作者
Comiter, Craig V. [1 ]
Dobberfuhl, Amy D. [1 ]
机构
[1] Stanford Univ, Dept Urol, Sch Med, 300 Pasteur Dr,S-287, Stanford, CA 94305 USA
关键词
Artificial urinary sphincter; Prostatectomy; Stress urinary incontinence; Suburethral slings; Urodynamics; LEAK POINT PRESSURE; RADICAL RETROPUBIC PROSTATECTOMY; STRESS-INCONTINENCE; PERFUSION SPHINCTEROMETRY; SURGICAL-TREATMENT; FOLLOW-UP; OUTCOMES; MEN; MANAGEMENT; PLACEMENT;
D O I
10.4111/icu.2016.57.1.3
中图分类号
R5 [内科学]; R69 [泌尿科学(泌尿生殖系疾病)];
学科分类号
1002 ; 100201 ;
摘要
Surgery is the most efficacious treatment for postprostatectomy incontinence. The ideal surgical approach depends on a variety of patient factors including history of prior incontinence surgery or radiation treatment, bladder contractility, severity of leakage, and patient expectations. Most patients choose to avoid a mechanical device, opting for the male sling over the artificial urinary sphincter. The modern male sling has continued to evolve with respect to device design and surgical technique. Various types of slings address sphincteric incompetence via different mechanisms of action. The recommended surgery, however, must be individualized to the patient based on degree of incontinence, detrusor contractility, and urethral compliance. A thorough urodynamic evaluation is indicated for the majority of patients, and the recommendation for an artificial urinary sphincter, a transobturator sling, or a quadratic sling will depend on urodynamic findings and the patient's particular preference. As advancements in this field evolve, and our understanding of the pathophysiology of incontinence and mechanisms of various devices improves, we expect to see continued evolution in device design.
引用
收藏
页码:3 / 13
页数:11
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [1] Surgery for postprostatectomy incontinence: which procedure for which patient?
    Comiter, Craig
    NATURE REVIEWS UROLOGY, 2015, 12 (02) : 91 - 99
  • [2] Surgery Insight: surgical management of postprostatectomy incontinence - the artificial urinary sphincter and male sling
    Comiter, Craig V.
    NATURE CLINICAL PRACTICE UROLOGY, 2007, 4 (11): : 615 - 624
  • [3] Treatment of postprostatectomy incontinence: Is the bulbourethral sling a viable alternative to the artificial urinary sphincter?
    Petrou S.P.
    Current Urology Reports, 2002, 3 (5) : 360 - 364
  • [4] Outcomes of Artificial Urinary Sphincter Implantation in Patients with Detrusor Underactivity and Postprostatectomy Incontinence
    Han, Kyu Hun
    Kim, Joon Chul
    Bae, Woong Jin
    Choi, Jin Bong
    Koh, Jun Sung
    Cho, Kang Jun
    UROLOGY JOURNAL, 2023, 20 (04) : 234 - 239
  • [5] The Artificial Urinary Sphincter is Superior to a Secondary Transobturator Male Sling in Cases of a Primary Sling Failure
    Ajay, Divya
    Zhang, Haijing
    Gupta, Shubham
    Selph, John P.
    Belsante, Michael J.
    Lentz, Aaron C.
    Webster, George D.
    Peterson, Andrew C.
    JOURNAL OF UROLOGY, 2015, 194 (04): : 1038 - 1042
  • [6] Simultaneous penile prosthesis and male sling/artificial urinary sphincter
    Lee, Dominic
    Romero, Claudio
    Alba, Frances
    Westney, O. Lenaine
    Wang, Run
    ASIAN JOURNAL OF ANDROLOGY, 2013, 15 (01) : 10 - 15
  • [7] Which sling for stress urinary incontinence?
    Vervest, HAM
    GYNAECOLOGY, OBSTETRICS, AND REPRODUCTIVE MEDICINE IN DAILY PRACTICE, 2005, 1279 : 426 - 437
  • [8] ZSI 375 artificial urinary sphincter for male urinary incontinence: a preliminary study
    Staerman, Frederic
    G-Llorens, Christophe
    Leon, Priscilla
    Leclerc, Yves
    BJU INTERNATIONAL, 2013, 111 (4B) : E202 - E206
  • [9] Operative Therapy for Stress Urinary Incontinence in Men - From Sling to Artificial Sphincter
    Nyarangi-Dix, J.
    Huber, J.
    Haferkamp, A.
    Hohenfellner, M.
    AKTUELLE UROLOGIE, 2011, 42 (05) : 306 - 310
  • [10] Male urinary incontinence: Artificial sphincter
    Truzzi, Jose Carlos
    Sacomani, Carlos R.
    Prezotti, Jose
    Silvinato, Antonio
    Bernardo, Wanderley Marques
    REVISTA DA ASSOCIACAO MEDICA BRASILEIRA, 2017, 63 (08): : 664 - 680