Rethinking risk attitude: Aspiration as pure risk

被引:3
作者
Davies, Greg B. [1 ]
机构
[1] UCL, London SW15 3TL, England
基金
英国经济与社会研究理事会;
关键词
risk; pure risk attitude; aspiration levels; Subjective Expected Utility Theory; Prospect Theory; Pure Risk Prospect Theory; strength of preference;
D O I
10.1007/s11238-006-0007-y
中图分类号
F [经济];
学科分类号
02 ;
摘要
There exists no completely satisfactory theory of risk attitude in current normative decision theories. Existing notions confound attitudes to pure risk with unrelated psychological factors such as strength of preference for certain outcomes, and probability weighting. In addition traditional measures of risk attitude frequently cannot be applied to non-numerical consequences, and are not psychologically intuitive. I develop Pure Risk theory which resolves these problems - it is consistent with existing normative theories, and both internalises and generalises the intuitive notion of risk being related to the probability of not achieving one's aspirations. Existing models which ignore pure risk attitudes may be misspecified, and effects hitherto modelled as loss aversion or utility curvature may be due instead to Pure Risk attitudes.
引用
收藏
页码:159 / 190
页数:32
相关论文
共 46 条
  • [1] Coherent measures of risk
    Artzner, P
    Delbaen, F
    Eber, JM
    Heath, D
    [J]. MATHEMATICAL FINANCE, 1999, 9 (03) : 203 - 228
  • [2] Bawa VS., 1975, Journal of Financial Economics, V2, P95, DOI DOI 10.1016/0304-405X(75)90025-2
  • [3] Bell D. E., 1988, DECISION MAKING DESC, P384
  • [4] Camerer C. F., 2003, BEHAV GAME THEORY
  • [5] Coombs C.H., 1975, HUMAN JUDGMENT DECIS, P63, DOI DOI 10.1016/B978-0-12-397250-7.50009-X
  • [6] EVALUATION OF 2 ALTERNATIVE MODELS FOR A THEORY OF RISK .1. ARE MOMENTS OF DISTRIBUTIONS USEFUL IN ASSESSING RISK
    COOMBS, CH
    LEHNER, PE
    [J]. JOURNAL OF EXPERIMENTAL PSYCHOLOGY-HUMAN PERCEPTION AND PERFORMANCE, 1981, 7 (05) : 1110 - 1123
  • [7] DAVIES GB, 2004, BEHAV COMPONENTS RIS
  • [8] On the intuition of rank-dependent utility
    Diecidue, E
    Wakker, PP
    [J]. JOURNAL OF RISK AND UNCERTAINTY, 2001, 23 (03) : 281 - 298
  • [9] DIECIDUE E, 2004, 200499DS INSEAD
  • [10] DUBINS LE, 1976, INEQUALITIES STOCKAS