Does Posture Influence the Stroop Effect?

被引:12
作者
Caron, Emilie E. [1 ]
Reynolds, Michael G. [2 ]
Ralph, Brandon C. W. [1 ]
Carriere, Jonathan S. A. [3 ]
Besner, Derek [1 ]
Smilek, Daniel [1 ]
机构
[1] Univ Waterloo, Dept Psychol, Waterloo, ON, Canada
[2] Trent Univ, Dept Psychol, Peterborough, ON, Canada
[3] Bishops Univ, Dept Psychol, Lennoxville, PQ, Canada
关键词
active workstations; standing desks; cognitive function; selective attention; Stroop task; open data; preregistered; INTERFERENCE;
D O I
10.1177/0956797620953842
中图分类号
B84 [心理学];
学科分类号
04 ; 0402 ;
摘要
Rosenbaum, Mama, and Algom (2017) reported that participants who completed the Stroop task (i.e., name the hue of a color word when the hue and word meaning are congruent or incongruent) showed a smaller Stroop effect (i.e., the difference in response times between congruent and incongruent trials) when they performed the task standing than when sitting. We report five attempted replications (analyzed sample sizes: N = 108, N = 108, N = 98, N = 78, and N = 51, respectively) of Rosenbaum et al.'s findings, which were conducted in two institutions. All experiments yielded the standard Stroop effect, but we failed to detect any consistent effect of posture (sitting vs. standing) on the magnitude of the Stroop effect. Taken together, the results suggest that posture does not influence the magnitude of the Stroop effect to the extent that was previously suggested.
引用
收藏
页码:1452 / 1460
页数:9
相关论文
共 16 条
  • [1] Ashcraft M.H., 1994, HUMAN MEMORY COGNITI, V2nd
  • [2] Effect of Standing or Walking at a Workstation on Cognitive Function: A Randomized Counterbalanced Trial
    Bantoft, Christina
    Summers, Mathew J.
    Tranent, Peter J.
    Palmer, Matthew A.
    Cooley, P. Dean
    Pedersen, Scott J.
    [J]. HUMAN FACTORS, 2016, 58 (01) : 140 - 149
  • [3] Hasenberger E, 2019, 2019 AES INTERNATIONAL CONFERENCE ON AUTOMOTIVE AUDIO
  • [4] Automaticity revisited: when print doesn't activate semantics
    Labuschagne, Elsa M.
    Besner, Derek
    [J]. FRONTIERS IN PSYCHOLOGY, 2015, 6
  • [5] USING CONFIDENCE-INTERVALS IN WITHIN-SUBJECT DESIGNS
    LOFTUS, GR
    MASSON, MEJ
    [J]. PSYCHONOMIC BULLETIN & REVIEW, 1994, 1 (04) : 476 - 490
  • [6] Training on integrated versus separated Stroop tasks: The progression of interference and facilitation
    MacLeod, CM
    [J]. MEMORY & COGNITION, 1998, 26 (02) : 201 - 211
  • [7] R Core Team, 2017, R LANG ENV STAT COMP
  • [8] Rayner K., 1989, The psychology of reading
  • [9] Stand by Your Stroop: Standing Up Enhances Selective Attention and Cognitive Control
    Rosenbaum, David
    Mama, Yaniv
    Algom, Daniel
    [J]. PSYCHOLOGICAL SCIENCE, 2017, 28 (12) : 1864 - 1867
  • [10] Default Bayes factors for ANOVA designs
    Rouder, Jeffrey N.
    Morey, Richard D.
    Speckman, Paul L.
    Province, Jordan M.
    [J]. JOURNAL OF MATHEMATICAL PSYCHOLOGY, 2012, 56 (05) : 356 - 374