Survey on RPL enhancements: A focus on topology, security and mobility

被引:77
作者
Kamgueu, Patrick Olivier [1 ,2 ]
Nataf, Emmanuel [1 ]
Ndie, Thomas Djotio [2 ]
机构
[1] Univ Lorraine, UMR 7503, INRIA Grand Est MADYNES Team, Nancy, France
[2] Univ Yaounde I, LIRIMA Team loT4D, Yaounde, Cameroon
关键词
RPL; Low-power and Lossy Networks; Topology optimization; Mobility; Security; Routing protocol; Internet of Things; LOW-POWER; INTRUSION DETECTION; ROUTING PROTOCOL; INTERNET; ATTACKS;
D O I
10.1016/j.comcom.2018.02.011
中图分类号
TP [自动化技术、计算机技术];
学科分类号
0812 ;
摘要
A few years ago, the IPv6 Routing Protocol for Low-power and Lossy Networks (RPL) was proposed by IETF as the routing standard designed for classes of networks in which both nodes and their interconnects are constrained. Since then, great attention has been paid by the scientific and industrial communities for the protocol evaluation and improvement. Indeed, depending on applications scenarios, constraints related to the target environments or other requirements, many adaptations and improvements can be made. So, since the initial release of the standard, several implementations were proposed, some targeting specific optimization goals whereas others would optimize several criteria while building the routing topology. They include, but are not limited to, extending the network lifetime, maximizing throughput at the sink node, avoiding the less secured nodes, considering nodes or sink mobility. Sometimes, to consider the Quality of Service (QoS), it is necessary to consider several of those criteria at the same time. This paper reviews recent works on RPL and highlights major contributions to its improvement, especially those related to topology optimization, security and mobility. We aim to provide an insight into relevant efforts around the protocol, draw some lessons and give useful guidelines for future developments.
引用
收藏
页码:10 / 21
页数:12
相关论文
共 92 条
  • [11] [Anonymous], 2013, 6997 RFC, DOI DOI 10.17487/RFC6997
  • [12] [Anonymous], 2012, 2012 20 IEEE INT C N
  • [13] [Anonymous], P INT WIR COMM MOB C
  • [14] [Anonymous], 2015, INT C NETWORK FUTURE
  • [15] [Anonymous], 2014, 2014 IEEE S COMP COM
  • [16] [Anonymous], INFORM PROCESSING 2
  • [17] [Anonymous], P 10 INT C INF PROC
  • [18] [Anonymous], 2014, P IEEE INT S WORLD W
  • [19] Aris A, 2016, IEEE IFIP NETW OPER, P776, DOI 10.1109/NOMS.2016.7502897
  • [20] Baccelli E., 2011, P 19 IEEE INT C SOFT, P1