On the binding affinity of macromolecular interactions: daring to ask why proteins interact

被引:343
作者
Kastritis, Panagiotis L. [1 ]
Bonvin, Alexandre M. J. J. [1 ]
机构
[1] Univ Utrecht, Fac Sci, Bijvoet Ctr Biomol Res, NL-3584 CH Utrecht, Netherlands
关键词
dissociation constant; protein interaction models; protein complex modelling; protein-protein docking; scoring functions; structure-affinity relations; SMALL-MOLECULE INHIBITORS; NUCLEAR-MAGNETIC-RESONANCE; PANCREATIC TRYPSIN-INHIBITOR; FREE-ENERGY FUNCTION; HOT-SPOTS; COMPUTATIONAL DESIGN; INDUCED-FIT; CONFORMATIONAL SELECTION; DRUG DISCOVERY; IN-VIVO;
D O I
10.1098/rsif.2012.0835
中图分类号
O [数理科学和化学]; P [天文学、地球科学]; Q [生物科学]; N [自然科学总论];
学科分类号
07 ; 0710 ; 09 ;
摘要
Interactions between proteins are orchestrated in a precise and time-dependent manner, underlying cellular function. The binding affinity, defined as the strength of these interactions, is translated into physico-chemical terms in the dissociation constant (K-d), the latter being an experimental measure that determines whether an interaction will be formed in solution or not. Predicting binding affinity from structural models has been a matter of active research for more than 40 years because of its fundamental role in drug development. However, all available approaches are incapable of predicting the binding affinity of protein-protein complexes from coordinates alone. Here, we examine both theoretical and experimental limitations that complicate the derivation of structure-affinity relationships. Most work so far has concentrated on binary interactions. Systems of increased complexity are far from being understood. The main physico-chemical measure that relates to binding affinity is the buried surface area, but it does not hold for flexible complexes. For the latter, there must be a significant entropic contribution that will have to be approximated in the future. We foresee that any theoretical modelling of these interactions will have to follow an integrative approach considering the biology, chemistry and physics that underlie protein-protein recognition.
引用
收藏
页数:27
相关论文
共 353 条
[21]   Global Dynamics of Proteins: Bridging Between Structure and Function [J].
Bahar, Ivet ;
Lezon, Timothy R. ;
Yang, Lee-Wei ;
Eyal, Eran .
ANNUAL REVIEW OF BIOPHYSICS, VOL 39, 2010, 39 :23-42
[22]   Predicting kinetic constants of protein-protein interactions based on structural properties [J].
Bai, Hongjun ;
Yang, Kun ;
Yu, Daqi ;
Zhang, Changsheng ;
Chen, Fangjin ;
Lai, Luhua .
PROTEINS-STRUCTURE FUNCTION AND BIOINFORMATICS, 2011, 79 (03) :720-734
[23]   Water as an active constituent in cell biology [J].
Ball, Philip .
CHEMICAL REVIEWS, 2008, 108 (01) :74-108
[24]   Water as a Biomolecule [J].
Ball, Philip .
CHEMPHYSCHEM, 2008, 9 (18) :2677-2685
[25]   Network biology:: Understanding the cell's functional organization [J].
Barabási, AL ;
Oltvai, ZN .
NATURE REVIEWS GENETICS, 2004, 5 (02) :101-U15
[26]   ION-PAIRS IN PROTEINS [J].
BARLOW, DJ ;
THORNTON, JM .
JOURNAL OF MOLECULAR BIOLOGY, 1983, 168 (04) :867-885
[27]   Genetic control of biochemical reactions in neurospora [J].
Beadle, GW ;
Tatum, EL .
PROCEEDINGS OF THE NATIONAL ACADEMY OF SCIENCES OF THE UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, 1941, 27 :499-506
[28]   Predicting free energy changes using structural ensembles [J].
Benedix, Alexander ;
Becker, Caroline M. ;
de Groot, Bert L. ;
Caflisch, Amedeo ;
Boeckmann, Rainer A. .
NATURE METHODS, 2009, 6 (01) :3-4
[29]   Using peptides to study protein-protein interactions [J].
Benyamini, Hadar ;
Friedler, Assaf .
FUTURE MEDICINAL CHEMISTRY, 2010, 2 (06) :989-1003
[30]   Modulation of protein-protein interactions with small organic molecules [J].
Berg, T .
ANGEWANDTE CHEMIE-INTERNATIONAL EDITION, 2003, 42 (22) :2462-2481