Investigation on co-gasification of coal and biomass in Shell gasifier by using a validated gasification model

被引:36
作者
Jeong, Hyo Jae [1 ]
Hwang, In Sik [2 ]
Park, Sang Shin [1 ]
Hwang, Jungho [2 ]
机构
[1] Doosan Heavy Ind & Construct, Corp R&D Inst, Yongin 16858, South Korea
[2] Yonsei Univ, Dept Mech Engn, Seoul 03722, South Korea
基金
新加坡国家研究基金会;
关键词
CFD; Shell gasifier; Co-gasification; Coal; Biomass; ENTRAINED-FLOW GASIFIER; FLUIDIZED-BED REACTORS; FAST PYROLYSIS; NUMERICAL-SIMULATION; CHAR GASIFICATION; REACTION-KINETICS; COMBUSTION; IMPACT; SIZE; MECHANISMS;
D O I
10.1016/j.fuel.2017.01.103
中图分类号
TE [石油、天然气工业]; TK [能源与动力工程];
学科分类号
0807 ; 0820 ;
摘要
Co-utilization of coal and biomass in a power plant can reduce the overall CO2 emission by partly displacing fossil-fuel combustion with near-carbon-neutral combustion of biomass. Computational fluid dynamics (CFD) modeling of co-gasification is conducted using a validated gasification model to examine the effect of biomass amount on the co-gasification process in a Shell gasifier. In the sub-models for coal and biomass char reactions, pore and bulk diffusions are considered using a user-defined function. The coal (Douglas premium coal, South Africa) and biomass (wood pellet treated from sawdust of pine and oak in South Korea) blend ratios (based on calorific value) are 0.0 (coal 100%), 0.05, 0.1, 0.15, and 0.2. The CFD model is validated using the actual operating data of the integrated gasification combined cycle plant located in Puertollano, Spain. The CO concentration decreases but that of H-2 increases with increasing blend ratio. The cold gas efficiencies range between 82.8% and 88.1%, and the carbon conversion efficiencies are higher than 99.8% for all blend ratios. These efficiencies are similar to those of coal gasification. However, blend ratios of 0.15 and 0.2 are not appropriate for co-gasification because the exit temperatures calculated for these two blend ratios are 1708 and 1621 K, respectively, in which both are lower than the critical slag viscosity temperature (1753 K) of the coal used in this study. (C) 2017 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.
引用
收藏
页码:371 / 377
页数:7
相关论文
共 37 条
[1]  
[Anonymous], P COMBUST I
[2]   Uncatalyzed and wall-catalyzed forward water-gas shift reaction kinetics [J].
Bustamante, F ;
Enick, RM ;
Killmeyer, RP ;
Howard, BH ;
Rothenberger, KS ;
Cugini, AV ;
Morreale, BD ;
Ciocco, MV .
AICHE JOURNAL, 2005, 51 (05) :1440-1454
[3]   Use of lower grade coals in IGCC plants with carbon capture for the co-production of hydrogen and electricity [J].
Cormos, Calin-Cristian ;
Starr, Fred ;
Tzimas, Evangelos .
INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF HYDROGEN ENERGY, 2010, 35 (02) :556-567
[4]  
Cussler E.L., 2009, Diffusion, VThird, DOI 10.1017/CBO9780511805134
[5]  
El-Rub ZA, 2008, THESIS
[6]   A CFD based combustion model of an entrained flow biomass gasifier [J].
Fletcher, DF ;
Haynes, BS ;
Christo, FC ;
Joseph, SD .
APPLIED MATHEMATICAL MODELLING, 2000, 24 (03) :165-182
[7]   Model development for biomass gasification in an entrained flow gasifier using intrinsic reaction rate submodel [J].
Gao, Xiaoyan ;
Zhang, Yaning ;
Li, Bingxi ;
Yu, Xiangyu .
ENERGY CONVERSION AND MANAGEMENT, 2016, 108 :120-131
[8]   Reduced order modeling of the Shell-Prenflo entrained flow gasifier [J].
Gazzani, Matteo ;
Manzolini, Giampaolo ;
Macchi, Ennio ;
Ghoniem, Ahmed F. .
FUEL, 2013, 104 :822-837
[9]   Modeling of biomass gasification in fluidized bed [J].
Gomez-Barea, A. ;
Leckner, B. .
PROGRESS IN ENERGY AND COMBUSTION SCIENCE, 2010, 36 (04) :444-509
[10]   The Impact of Biomass Cofiring on Volatile Flame Length [J].
Holtmeyer, Melissa L. ;
Li, Gengda ;
Kumfer, Benjamin M. ;
Li, Shuiqing ;
Axelbaum, Richard L. .
ENERGY & FUELS, 2013, 27 (12) :7762-7771