COVID-19 Claims and the Law of International Responsibility

被引:2
作者
Paparinskis, Martins [1 ]
机构
[1] UCL, Fac Laws, Publ Int Law, London, England
关键词
covid-19; State responsibility; responsibility of international organizations; internationally wrongful act; content of responsibility; causality; implementation of responsibility; countermeasures; STATE RESPONSIBILITY;
D O I
10.1163/18781527-bja10014
中图分类号
D9 [法律]; DF [法律];
学科分类号
0301 ;
摘要
This paper considers the role that the law of international responsibility, both State responsibility and responsibility of international organizations, plays in claims and disputes about COVID-19. It proceeds by examining in turn the rubrics of the internationally wrongful act, content of responsibility, and implementation of responsibility. On most points, blackletter law is perfectly capable of answering the questions raised by claims related to COVID-19. But evolutionary potential inherent in the normal international legal process should also be recognised, whether it manifests itself by further strengthening current rules, elaborating vague rules by application, filling gaps in current law by generating new practice or even, exceptionally, revisiting rules currently in force.
引用
收藏
页码:311 / 330
页数:20
相关论文
共 32 条
[1]  
ALLOTT P, 1988, HARVARD INT LAW J, V29, P1
[2]  
Bartels L., 2020, EXCEPTIONS INT LAW
[3]  
Bundy R, 2020, RECUEIL COURS, V406, P13
[5]  
Council of Europe, COVID 19 HUM RIGHTS
[6]  
Crawford J., 2013, HAGUE RECUEIL, V365, P19
[7]  
Crawford James, 1994, VOLKERRECHT ZWISCHEN
[8]  
Crawford James, 2013, RECUEIL COURS, V365, P21
[9]  
Cummins Sally J, 2017, DIGEST US PRACTICE I, P2009
[10]   General/Particular International Law and Primary/Secondary Rules: Unitary Terminology of a Fragmented System [J].
Gourgourinis, Anastasios .
EUROPEAN JOURNAL OF INTERNATIONAL LAW, 2011, 22 (04) :993-1026