Endoscopic ultrasound-guided gastro-enteric anastomosis: A systematic review and meta-analysis

被引:28
作者
Antonelli, Giulio [1 ,2 ,5 ]
Kovacevic, Bojan [2 ]
Karstensen, John Gasdal [3 ]
Kalaitzakis, Evangelos [2 ,4 ]
Vanella, Giuseppe [1 ,6 ]
Hassan, Cesare [5 ]
Vilmann, Peter [2 ]
机构
[1] Sapienza Univ Rome, St Andrea Univ Hosp, Endoscopy Unit, Via Grottarossa 1035-1039, I-00189 Rome, Italy
[2] Copenhagen Univ Hosp Herlev, Div Endoscopy, Gastro Unit, Herlev, Denmark
[3] Copenhagen Univ Hosp Hvidovre, Gastro Unit, Hvidovre, Denmark
[4] Univ Crete, Univ Hosp Heraklion, Dept Gastroenterol, Iraklion, Greece
[5] Nuovo Regina Margherita Hosp, Endoscopy Unit, Rome, Italy
[6] IRCSS San Raffaele Sci Inst, Pancreas Translat & Clin Res Ctr, Pancreatobiliary Endoscopy & EUS Div, Milan, Italy
关键词
Endoscopic ultrasound; Enteric anastomosis; Gastric outlet obsturction; Lumen apposing metal stent; EDGE; APPOSING METAL STENT; GASTROJEJUNOSTOMY; GASTROENTEROSTOMY; EXPERIENCE;
D O I
10.1016/j.dld.2020.04.021
中图分类号
R57 [消化系及腹部疾病];
学科分类号
摘要
Background and aims: Endoscopic ultrasound-guided gastro-enteric anastomosis (EUS-GEA) using lumen-apposing metal stents (LAMS) is emerging as a minimally invasive alternative to surgery across several indications. Literature on this subject is heterogeneous, with variable reporting of techniques and outcomes. Our aim was to perform a meta-analysis of published data on EUS-GEA, providing a pooled estimate of technical and clinical outcomes. Methods: The protocol was registered in PROSPERO (Reg. no. CRD42018111110). PubMed, Embase, Scopus, and Web of Science databases were searched until February 2019 for studies describing patients undergoing EUS guided enteric anastomosis. PRISMA methodology was used. Pooled technical and clinical success rates as well as pooled adverse events rates were calculated. Study quality, publication bias, and heterogeneity were explored. Results: Twelve studies including 290 patients were included, published between 2016 and 2019. All studies but one were retrospective. Main procedure indication was gastric outlet obstruction (62.4%), followed by ERCP access (27.9%) in patients with gastric bypass surgery. Direct puncture technique was the most frequently adopted (68.2%). Pooled technical success rate (12 studies, 290 patients) was 93.5% [95% confidence interval (CI) 89.7-6.0%; I-2 :0%], while clinical success rate (11 studies, 260 patients) was 90.1% [95%CI 85.5-93.4%; I-2:0%]. Pooled total adverse events rate (11 cohorts, 261 patients) was 11.7% [95%CI 8.2-16.6%; I-2 :0%], mainly mild/moderate: 10.6% [95%CI 7 - 15.6%]. No publication bias or significant heterogeneity was found. Conclusions: EUS-GEA has a high rate of technical and clinical success when performed in expert centers. The procedure appears to be relatively safe, and might represent a non-inferior minimally invasive alternative to surgery. The paucity of long-term clinical outcomes suggests prudency and need for further research, especially regarding non-malignant indications. (C) 2020 Editrice Gastroenterologica Italiana S.r.l. Published by Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.
引用
收藏
页码:1294 / 1301
页数:8
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [31] Endoscopic ultrasound-guided gastroenterostomy: a review
    Golikov, Edwin
    Widmer, Jessica
    TRANSLATIONAL GASTROENTEROLOGY AND HEPATOLOGY, 2025, 10
  • [32] Endoscopic ultrasound-guided gastroenterostomy (gastroenteric anastomosis)
    de Oliveira, Joel Fernandez
    Franco, Matheus Cavalcante
    Rodela, Gustavo
    Maluf-Filho, Fauze
    Martins, Bruno Costa
    INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF GASTROINTESTINAL INTERVENTION, 2022, 11 (03): : 112 - 118
  • [33] A Meta-Analysis Comparing Endoscopic Ultrasound-guided Fine-needle Aspiration With Endoscopic Ultrasound-guided Fine-needle Biopsy
    Li, Zhiwang
    Liu, Wei
    Xu, Xiaoda
    Li, Peiyu
    JOURNAL OF CLINICAL GASTROENTEROLOGY, 2022, 56 (08) : 668 - 678
  • [34] Endoscopic ultrasound-guided vs endoscopic retrograde cholangiopancreatography biliary drainage for obstructed distal malignant biliary strictures: A systematic review and meta-analysis
    Logiudice, Fernanda P.
    Bernardo, Wanderlei M.
    Galetti, Facundo
    Sagae, Vitor M.
    Matsubayashi, Carolina O.
    Madruga Neto, Antonio C.
    Brunaldi, Vitor O.
    de Moura, Diogo T. H.
    Franzini, Tomazo
    Cheng, Spencer
    Matuguma, Sergio E.
    de Moura, Eduardo G. H.
    WORLD JOURNAL OF GASTROINTESTINAL ENDOSCOPY, 2019, 11 (04): : 281 - 291
  • [35] Endoscopic ultrasound-guided ethanol vs ethanol combined with paclitaxel for the ablation of pancreatic cystic lesions: a systematic review and meta-analysis
    Cong Ding
    Jianfeng Yang
    Jing Yang
    Qiang Liu
    Yishen Mao
    Qi Ding
    Ye Gu
    Xiaofeng Zhang
    BMC Gastroenterology, 25 (1)
  • [36] Value of Endoscopic Ultrasound-Guided Through-the-Needle Biopsy in Pancreatic Cystic Lesions. A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis
    Gopakumar, Harishankar
    Puli, Srinivas R.
    JOURNAL OF GASTROINTESTINAL CANCER, 2024, 55 (01) : 15 - 25
  • [37] Value of Endoscopic Ultrasound-Guided Through-the-Needle Biopsy in Pancreatic Cystic Lesions. A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis
    Harishankar Gopakumar
    Srinivas R. Puli
    Journal of Gastrointestinal Cancer, 2024, 55 : 15 - 25
  • [38] Diagnostic accuracy of 22/25-gauge core needle in endoscopic ultrasound-guided sampling: systematic review and meta-analysis
    Oh, Hyoung-Chul
    Kang, Hyun
    Lee, Jae Young
    Choi, Geun Joo
    Choi, Jung Sik
    KOREAN JOURNAL OF INTERNAL MEDICINE, 2016, 31 (06) : 1073 - +
  • [39] Ultrasound-Guided Core Needle Biopsy of Salivary Gland Lesions: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis
    Witt, Benjamin L.
    Schmidt, Robert L.
    LARYNGOSCOPE, 2014, 124 (03) : 695 - 700
  • [40] Outcomes of endoscopic ultrasound-guided gastro-enterostomy for gastric outlet obstruction in a two-centre Australian Cohort (with video)
    Harb, Martin
    Kamath, Arvind
    Marx, Gavin
    Gupta, Saurabh
    ASIA-PACIFIC JOURNAL OF CLINICAL ONCOLOGY, 2024, 20 (01) : 87 - 92