Weighting Key Performance Indicators of Smart Local Energy Systems: A Discrete Choice Experiment

被引:3
|
作者
Francis, Christina [1 ,3 ]
Hansen, Paul [2 ]
Guolaugsson, Bjarnheoinn [1 ]
Ingram, David M. [1 ]
Thomson, R. Camilla [1 ]
机构
[1] Univ Edinburgh, Sch Engn, Colin Maclaurin Rd, Edinburgh EH9 3DW, Scotland
[2] Univ Otago, Dept Econ, Dunedin 9054, New Zealand
[3] London South Bank Univ, Sch Built Environm & Architecture, 103 Borough Rd, London SE1 0AA, England
基金
英国科研创新办公室;
关键词
multi-criteria assessment; MCA; key performance indicators; KPI; Smart Local Energy Systems; SLES; discrete choice experiments; TECHNOECONOMIC EVALUATION; MULTICRITERIA ANALYSIS; INTEGRATED ASSESSMENT; DECISION-MAKING; TECHNOLOGIES; COMMUNITIES; MANAGEMENT; CRITERIA; CITIES;
D O I
10.3390/en15249305
中图分类号
TE [石油、天然气工业]; TK [能源与动力工程];
学科分类号
0807 ; 0820 ;
摘要
The development of Smart Local Energy Systems (SLES) in the UK is part of the energy transition tackling the energy trilemma and contributing to achieving the Sustainable Development Goals (SDGs). Project developers and other stakeholders need to independently assess the performance of these systems: how well they meet their aims to successfully deliver multiple benefits and objectives. This article describes a step undertaken by the EnergyREV Research Consortium in developing a standardised Multi-Criteria Assessment (MCA) tool-specifically a discrete choice experiment (DCE) to determine the weighting of key performance indicators (KPIs). The MCA tool will use a technology-agnostic framework to assess SLES projects, track system performance and monitor benefit realisation. In order to understand the perceived relative importance of KPIs across different stakeholders, seven DCEs were conducted via online surveys (using 1000minds software). The main survey (with 234 responses) revealed that Environment was considered the most important criterion, with a mean weight of 21.6%. This was followed by People and Living (18.9%), Technical Performance (17.8%) and Data Management (14.7%), with Business and Economics and Governance ranked the least important (13.9% and 13.1%, respectively). These results are applied as weightings to calculate overall scores in the EnergyREV MCA-SLES tool.
引用
收藏
页数:17
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [1] Key Performance Indicators for Smart Energy Systems in Sustainable Universities
    Kifor, Claudiu Vasile
    Olteanu, Alexandru
    Zerbes, Mihai
    ENERGIES, 2023, 16 (03)
  • [2] A Generic Framework for the Definition of Key Performance Indicators for Smart Energy Systems at Different Scales
    Efkarpidis, Nikolaos
    Goranovic, Andrija
    Yang, Chen-Wei
    Geidl, Martin
    Herbst, Ingo
    Wilker, Stefan
    Sauter, Thilo
    ENERGIES, 2022, 15 (04)
  • [3] A SIMULATION STUDY COMPARING THE PERFORMANCE OF DISCRETE CHOICE EXPERIMENT AND SWING WEIGHTING FOR ELICITATION OF PREFERENCES
    Zur, R. M.
    Aballea, S.
    Taieb, V
    Toumi, M.
    VALUE IN HEALTH, 2019, 22 : S827 - S827
  • [4] A Methodology for Determination and Definition of Key Performance Indicators for Smart Grids Development in Island Energy Systems
    Pramangioulis, Dionysios
    Atsonios, Konstantinos
    Nikolopoulos, Nikos
    Rakopoulos, Dimitrios
    Grammelis, Panagiotis
    Kakaras, Emmanuel
    ENERGIES, 2019, 12 (02):
  • [5] Machine Learning Estimation of Battery Efficiency and Related Key Performance Indicators in Smart Energy Systems
    Luque, Joaquin
    Tepe, Benedikt
    Larios, Diego
    Leon, Carlos
    Hesse, Holger
    ENERGIES, 2023, 16 (14)
  • [6] INVESTIGATING THE IMPACT OF PERSPECTIVE ON WEIGHTING QALYs: A DISCRETE CHOICE EXPERIMENT
    Butt, T.
    Longworth, L.
    Rubin, G.
    Orr, S.
    VALUE IN HEALTH, 2014, 17 (07) : A331 - A331
  • [7] Developing a key performance indicators tree for lean and smart production systems
    Ante, G.
    Facchini, F.
    Mossa, G.
    Digiesi, S.
    IFAC PAPERSONLINE, 2018, 51 (11): : 13 - 18
  • [8] The development of quality indicators in mental healthcare: a discrete choice experiment
    Schellings, Ron
    Essers, Brigitte A. B.
    Kessels, Alfons G.
    Brunner, Florian
    van de Ven, Tijmen
    Robben, Paul B. M.
    BMC PSYCHIATRY, 2012, 12
  • [9] The development of quality indicators in mental healthcare: a discrete choice experiment
    Ron Schellings
    Brigitte AB Essers
    Alfons G Kessels
    Florian Brunner
    Tijmen van de Ven
    Paul BM Robben
    BMC Psychiatry, 12
  • [10] Key performance indicators for Smart Campus and Microgrid
    Alrashed, Saleh
    SUSTAINABLE CITIES AND SOCIETY, 2020, 60