Dynamic Contour Tonometry and Goldmann Applanation Tonometry: Difference of Intraocular Pressure Values Between Eyes with and without Glaucomatous Damage in Thin Corneas

被引:1
作者
Akkan, J. C. Umurhan [1 ]
Akkan, F. [2 ]
Akcay, B. I. Sezgin [3 ]
Ayintap, E. [1 ]
Tuncer, K. [1 ]
机构
[1] Bezmialem Vakif Univ, Fak Med, Augenklin, TR-34093 Istanbul, Turkey
[2] Lehr & Forsch Krankenhaus, Augenklin Istanbul, Istanbul, Turkey
[3] Lehr & Forsch Krankenhaus, Augenklin Umraniye, Istanbul, Turkey
关键词
intraocular pressure; Goldmann tonometry; dynamic contour tonometry; glaucoma; OPEN-ANGLE GLAUCOMA; THICKNESS; HEALTHY; AGE;
D O I
10.1055/s-0041-104772
中图分类号
R77 [眼科学];
学科分类号
100212 ;
摘要
Background: To examine the differences in intraocular pressure (IOP) measurements obtained with Goldmann applanation tonometry (GAT) and Pascal dynamic contour tonometry (DCT) in subjects with thin corneas and to correlate these with structural and functional parameters of glaucoma damage. Patients and Methods: One hundred and thirty participants (130 eyes) with central corneal thickness lower than 500 mu m were included in five groups in this cross-sectional observational study: 52 eyes with primary open angle glaucoma (POAG), 19 eyes with normal tension glaucoma (NTG), 27 eyes with ocular hypertension (OHT), 21 participants suspected of having glaucoma (GS), and 11 healthy subjects. The measurements were obtained with GAT and DCT in a masked fashion. The corrected GAT-IOP for central corneal thickness (CCT), the difference between DCT and GAT (Delta IOP = DCT-GAT) and corrected Delta IOP (corrected Delta IOP = DCT-corrected GAT) were calculated. Age, mean deviation (MD) from the most recent reliable visual field examination, average retinal nerve fibre layer thickness (RNFL), cup-to-disc ratio (CDR), ocular pulse amplitude (OPA), and treatment status were recorded for statistical analysis. Results: In all of the subjects (n = 130), the mean DCT, GAT and corrected GAT values were 17.6 +/- 3.4 mmHg, 13.2 +/- 3.8 mmHg, and 15.5 +/- 2.1 mmHg, respectively. Delta IOP and corrected Delta IOP were 4.4 +/- 2 mmHg and 1.7 +/- 2 mmHg, respectively. Delta IOP was correlated negatively with MD (rs = -0.32, p < 0.0001) and average RNFL thickness (r = -0.46, p < 0.0001) and positively with CDR (rs = 0.50, p < 0.0001). The mean IOP measured by GAT differed statistically significantly between eyes with glaucoma (n = 71, POAG and NTG) and eyes without damage (n = 59; OHT, GS, and healthy) (p < 0.0001), whereas the mean IOP by DCT did not (p = 0.935). The mean Delta IOP values were also statistically significantly higher in the glaucomatous group, with and without correction for CCT (p < 0.001). OPA and glaucoma diagnoses statistically significantly predicted Delta IOP (R-2 = 0.41, F-2.127 = 47.46, p < 0.0001). Conclusion: Greater underestimation of IOP by GAT was observed in the glaucomatous eyes with thin corneas. Performing DCT on patients with thin corneas might be advantageous in establishing the need for more aggressive treatment.
引用
收藏
页码:1190 / 1197
页数:8
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [41] Dynamic contour tonometry (DCT) versus Goldmann applanation tonometry (GAT) - a comparison of agreement and reproducibility
    Sonja Herdener
    Mona Pache
    Sonja Lautebach
    Jens Funk
    Graefe's Archive for Clinical and Experimental Ophthalmology, 2006, 245 : 1027 - 1030
  • [42] Rebound, Applanation, and Dynamic Contour Tonometry in Pathologic Corneas
    Rosentreter, Andre
    Athanasopoulos, Apostolos
    Schild, Andrea M.
    Lappas, Alexandra
    Cursiefen, Claus
    Dietlein, Thomas S.
    CORNEA, 2013, 32 (03) : 313 - 318
  • [43] Tonometry in corneal edema after cataract surgery: dynamic contour tonometry versus Goldmann applanation tonometry
    Herr, Anne
    Remky, Andreas
    Hirsch, Thalia
    Rennings, Corinna
    Plange, Niklas
    CLINICAL OPHTHALMOLOGY, 2013, 7 : 815 - 819
  • [45] IOP Measured by Dynamic Contour Tonometry Correlates With IOP Measured by Goldmann Applanation Tonometry and Non-contact Tonometry in Japanese Individuals
    Ito, Ken
    Tawara, Akihiko
    Kubota, Toshiaki
    Harada, Yukinori
    JOURNAL OF GLAUCOMA, 2012, 21 (01) : 35 - 40
  • [46] Goldmann Applanation Tonometry Versus Ocular Response Analyzer for Intraocular Pressure Measurements in Keratoconic Eyes
    Goldich, Yakov
    Barkana, Yaniv
    Avni, Isaac
    Zadok, David
    CORNEA, 2010, 29 (09) : 1011 - 1015
  • [47] Reproducibility of dynamic contour tonometry. Comparison with TonoPenXL and Goldmann applanation tonometry - A clinical study on 323 normal eyes
    Viestenz, A.
    Langenbucherz, A.
    Viestenz, A.
    KLINISCHE MONATSBLATTER FUR AUGENHEILKUNDE, 2006, 223 (10) : 813 - 819
  • [48] Comparison of the corrected intraocular pressure by tonopachy with that of Goldmann applanation tonometry in normal and glaucomatous patients
    Velis, Girish
    Kavitha, Srinivasan
    Zebardast, Nazlee
    Sengupta, Sabyasachi
    Venkatesh, Rengaraj
    INDIAN JOURNAL OF OPHTHALMOLOGY, 2020, 68 (04) : 620 - 626
  • [49] The effect of contact lens-induced corneal edema on Goldmann applanation tonometry and dynamic contour tonometry
    Oh, Jong-Hyun
    Yoo, Chungkwon
    Kim, Yong Yeon
    Kim, Hyo-Myung
    Song, Jong-Suk
    GRAEFES ARCHIVE FOR CLINICAL AND EXPERIMENTAL OPHTHALMOLOGY, 2009, 247 (03) : 371 - 375
  • [50] Intraocular pressure measurements with the Proview™ self-tonometer in comparison of Goldmann applanation tonometry in healthy and glaucomatous eyes
    Meyer, M. W.
    Yevelenko, V.
    Hoy, L.
    Meyer, A.
    Erb, C.
    KLINISCHE MONATSBLATTER FUR AUGENHEILKUNDE, 2006, 223 (11) : 899 - 903