The effects of continuous positive airway pressure and mandibular advancement therapy on metabolic outcomes of patients with mild obstructive sleep apnea: a randomized controlled study

被引:13
|
作者
Oliveira e Silva, Luciana [1 ]
Guimaraes, Thais Moura [1 ]
Pontes, Gabriela [2 ]
Coelho, Glaury [1 ]
Badke, Luciana [2 ]
Dal Fabbro, Cibele [3 ,4 ]
Tufik, Sergio [1 ]
Bittencourt, Lia [1 ]
Togeiro, Sonia [1 ,2 ]
机构
[1] Univ Fed Sao Paulo, Dept Psicobiol, Rua Napoleao Barros 925, BR-04021002 Vila Clementino, SP, Brazil
[2] Univ Fed Sao Paulo, Dept Pneumol, Sao Paulo, Brazil
[3] Inst Sono, Sao Paulo, Brazil
[4] Univ Montreal, Res Ctr, Ctr Adv Res Sleep Med, Fac Dent Med, Montreal, PQ, Canada
基金
巴西圣保罗研究基金会;
关键词
Sleep; CPAP; Oral appliance; Mild obstructive sleep apnea; Metabolic profile; GLUCOSE-METABOLISM; INSULIN-RESISTANCE; DAYTIME SLEEPINESS; CPAP THERAPY; IMPACT; METAANALYSIS; DYSLIPIDEMIA; PREVALENCE; GUIDELINES;
D O I
10.1007/s11325-020-02183-1
中图分类号
R74 [神经病学与精神病学];
学科分类号
摘要
Background Moderate and severe obstructive sleep apnea (OSA) have been independently associated with dyslipidemia. The results of metabolic improvement with continuous positive airway pressure (CPAP) have been controversial. Less evidence exists regarding this issue in mild OSA. A current treatment for mild OSA is mandibular advancement device (MAD) therapy, but its effectiveness on the metabolic profile needs to be compared with CPAP. The purpose of this study was to compare MAD vs CPAP vs no treatment on the metabolic profile during 6 and 12 months of follow-up in patients with mild OSA. Methods The inclusion criteria were patients with mild OSA, both genders, ages 18 to 65 years, and body mass index (BMI) of < 35 Kg/m(2). Patients were randomized in 3 groups (CPAP, MAD, and control). The evaluations included physical examination, metabolic profile, and full polysomnography at baseline, 6 months, and 12 months of follow-up. Results Seventy-nine patients with mild OSA were randomized in three treatment groups, with mean age (+/- SD) of 47 +/- 9 years, 54% men, and AHI 9.5 +/- 2.9 events/h. MAD and CPAP reduced AHI at 6 and 12 months compared to the control group. MAD adherence was higher than CPAP at 6 and 12 months. Despite lower adherence compared to MAD, CPAP was more effective in reducing total cholesterol over 12 months (baseline 189.3 +/- 60.2 mg/dl to 173.4 +/- 74.3 mg/dl) and low-density lipoprotein cholesterol (LDL-c, baseline 112.8 +/- 54.9 mg/dl to 94.5 +/- 67.4 mg/dl). Conclusions After 1 year of treatment, CPAP was superior to MAD in reducing total cholesterol and LDL-c in patients with mild OSA.
引用
收藏
页码:797 / 805
页数:9
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [1] The effects of continuous positive airway pressure and mandibular advancement therapy on metabolic outcomes of patients with mild obstructive sleep apnea: a randomized controlled study
    Luciana Oliveira e Silva
    Thais Moura Guimarães
    Gabriela Pontes
    Glaury Coelho
    Luciana Badke
    Cibele Dal Fabbro
    Sergio Tufik
    Lia Bittencourt
    Sonia Togeiro
    Sleep and Breathing, 2021, 25 : 797 - 805
  • [2] Cardiovascular and metabolic effects of a mandibular advancement device and continuous positive airway pressure in moderate obstructive sleep apnea: a randomized controlled trial
    Venema, Julia A. M. Uniken
    Knol-de Vries, Grietje E.
    van Goor, Harry
    Westra, Johanna
    Hoekema, Aarnoud
    Wijkstra, Peter J.
    JOURNAL OF CLINICAL SLEEP MEDICINE, 2022, 18 (06): : 1547 - 1555
  • [3] Mandibular Advancement Devices in Obstructive Sleep Apnea Patients Intolerant to Continuous Positive Airway Pressure Treatment
    Wojda, M.
    Kostrzewa-Janicka, J.
    Sliwinski, P.
    Bielen, P.
    Jurkowski, P.
    Wojda, R.
    Mierzwinska-Nastalska, E.
    PULMONARY HEALTH AND DISORDERS, 2019, 1150 : 35 - 42
  • [4] Continuous Positive Airway Pressure Therapy in Gestational Diabetes With Obstructive Sleep Apnea: A Randomized Controlled Trial
    Chirakalwasan, Naricha
    Amnakkittikul, Somvang
    Wanitcharoenkul, Ekasitt
    Charoensri, Suranut
    Saetung, Sunee
    Chanprasertyothin, Suwannee
    Chailurkit, La-or
    Panburana, Panyu
    Bumrungphuet, Sommart
    Takkinstian, Ammarin
    Reutrakul, Sirimon
    JOURNAL OF CLINICAL SLEEP MEDICINE, 2018, 14 (03): : 327 - 336
  • [5] The effect of continuous positive airway pressure and mandibular advancement device on sleep bruxism intensity in obstructive sleep apnea patients
    Martynowicz, Helena
    Wieczorek, Tomasz
    Macek, Piotr
    Wojakowska, Anna
    Poreba, Rafal
    Gac, Pawel
    Mazur, Grzegorz
    Skomro, Robert
    Smardz, Joanna
    Wieckiewicz, Mieszko
    CHRONIC RESPIRATORY DISEASE, 2021, 18
  • [6] Effects of Continuous Positive Airway Pressure Therapy Withdrawal in Patients with Obstructive Sleep Apnea A Randomized Controlled Trial
    Kohler, Malcolm
    Stoewhas, Anne-Christin
    Ayers, Lisa
    Senn, Oliver
    Bloch, Konrad E.
    Russi, Erich W.
    Stradling, John R.
    AMERICAN JOURNAL OF RESPIRATORY AND CRITICAL CARE MEDICINE, 2011, 184 (10) : 1192 - 1199
  • [7] Impact of continuous positive airway pressure therapy withdrawal in patients with obstructive sleep apnea: a randomized controlled trial
    Wali, Siraj Omar
    Batawi, Ghadah
    Kanbr, Omar
    Butt, Nadeem Shafique
    Yasawy, Murad A.
    Alqaidi, Dalyah
    Alhejaili, Faris
    Alshumrani, Ranya
    Gozal, David
    SLEEP AND BREATHING, 2025, 29 (02)
  • [8] Acute effects of continuous positive airway pressure in patients with obstructive sleep apnea
    Han, Su-Hyun
    Lee, Sang-Ahm
    SCANDINAVIAN CARDIOVASCULAR JOURNAL, 2020, 54 (01) : 26 - 31
  • [9] Microvascular endothelial function in obstructive sleep apnea: Impact of continuous positive airway pressure and mandibular advancement
    Trzepizur, Wojciech
    Gagnadoux, Frederic
    Abraham, Pierre
    Rousseau, Pascal
    Meslier, Nicole
    Saumet, Jean-Louis
    Racineux, Jean-Louis
    SLEEP MEDICINE, 2009, 10 (07) : 746 - 752
  • [10] Mandibular advancement splints decrease blood pressure similarly as with continuous positive airway pressure in sleep apnea
    Huynh, N. T.
    ORAL DISEASES, 2016, 22 (05) : 348 - 349