Spatial representation of magnitude in humans (Homo sapiens), Western lowland gorillas (Gorilla gorilla gorilla), and American black bears (Ursus americanus)

被引:9
作者
Johnson-Ulrich, Zoe [1 ]
Vonk, Jennifer [1 ]
机构
[1] Oakland Univ, Dept Psychol, 654 Pioneer Dr, Rochester, MI 48309 USA
关键词
SNARC; Spatial representation; Magnitude; Quantity; Humans; Gorillas; Bears; MONKEYS MACACA-MULATTA; NUMERICAL ASSESSMENT; QUANTITY JUDGMENTS; MENTAL REPRESENTATION; NEGATIVE NUMBERS; CEBUS-APELLA; BAI-HOKOU; SNARC; DISCRIMINATION; SPACE;
D O I
10.1007/s10071-018-1186-y
中图分类号
B84 [心理学]; C [社会科学总论]; Q98 [人类学];
学科分类号
03 ; 0303 ; 030303 ; 04 ; 0402 ;
摘要
The spatial-numerical association of response codes (SNARC) effect is the tendency for humans to respond faster to relatively larger numbers on the left or right (or with the left or right hand) and faster to relatively smaller numbers on the other side. This effect seems to occur due to a spatial representation of magnitude either in occurrence with a number line (wherein participants respond to relatively larger numbers faster on the right), other representations such as clock faces (responses are reversed from number lines), or culturally specific reading directions, begging the question as to whether the effect may be limited to humans. Given that a SNARC effect has emerged via a quantity judgement task in Western lowland gorillas and orangutans (Gazes et al., Cog 168:312-319, 2017), we examined patterns of response on a quantity discrimination task in American black bears, Western lowland gorillas, and humans for evidence of a SNARC effect. We found limited evidence for SNARC effect in American black bears and Western lowland gorillas. Furthermore, humans were inconsistent in direction and strength of effects, emphasizing the importance of standardizing methodology and analyses when comparing SNARC effects between species. These data reveal the importance of collecting data with humans in analogous procedures when testing nonhumans for effects assumed to bepresent in humans.
引用
收藏
页码:531 / 550
页数:20
相关论文
共 60 条
[1]   Spontaneous Spatial Mapping of Learned Sequence in Chimpanzees: Evidence for a SNARC-Like Effect [J].
Adachi, Ikuma .
PLOS ONE, 2014, 9 (03)
[2]   Do fish count? Spontaneous discrimination of quantity in female mosquitofish [J].
Agrillo, Christian ;
Dadda, Marco ;
Serena, Giovanna ;
Bisazza, Angelo .
ANIMAL COGNITION, 2008, 11 (03) :495-503
[3]   Relative numerousness judgment and summation in young and old Western lowland gorillas [J].
Anderson, US ;
Stoinski, TS ;
Bloomsmith, MA ;
Marr, MJ ;
Smith, AD ;
Maple, TL .
JOURNAL OF COMPARATIVE PSYCHOLOGY, 2005, 119 (03) :285-295
[4]  
[Anonymous], 1987, WILDLIFE MONOGR
[5]   Stimulus-response compatibility in representational space [J].
Bächtold, D ;
Baumüller, M ;
Brugger, P .
NEUROPSYCHOLOGIA, 1998, 36 (08) :731-735
[6]   Tracking of food quantity by coyotes (Canis latrans) [J].
Baker, Joseph M. ;
Shivik, John ;
Jordan, Kerry E. .
BEHAVIOURAL PROCESSES, 2011, 88 (02) :72-75
[7]   More or less: spontaneous quantity discrimination in the domestic cat [J].
Banszegi, Oxana ;
Urrutia, Andrea ;
Szenczi, Peter ;
Hudson, Robyn .
ANIMAL COGNITION, 2016, 19 (05) :879-888
[8]   Numerical assessment and individual call discrimination by wild spotted hyaenas, Crocuta crocuta [J].
Benson-Amram, Sarah ;
Heinen, Virginia K. ;
Dryer, Sean L. ;
Holekamp, Kay E. .
ANIMAL BEHAVIOUR, 2011, 82 (04) :743-752
[9]   Monkeys (Macaca mulatta and Cebus apella) track, enumerate, and compare multiple sets of moving items [J].
Beran, Michael J. .
JOURNAL OF EXPERIMENTAL PSYCHOLOGY-ANIMAL BEHAVIOR PROCESSES, 2008, 34 (01) :63-74
[10]   Free-ranging dogs assess the quantity of opponents in intergroup conflicts [J].
Bonanni, Roberto ;
Natoli, Eugenia ;
Cafazzo, Simona ;
Valsecchi, Paola .
ANIMAL COGNITION, 2011, 14 (01) :103-115