Genomic predictions across Nordic Holstein and Nordic Red using the genomic best linear unbiased prediction model with different genomic relationship matrices

被引:34
作者
Zhou, L. [1 ]
Lund, M. S. [1 ]
Wang, Y. [2 ]
Su, G. [1 ]
机构
[1] Aarhus Univ, Dept Mol Biol & Genet, Ctr Quantitat Genet & Genom, DK-8830 Tjele, Denmark
[2] China Agr Univ, Coll Anim Sci & Technol, Natl Engn Lab Anim Breeding, Key Lab Agr Anim Genet & Breeding, Beijing 100094, Peoples R China
关键词
Genomic selection; multibreed; marker-based relationship matrix; linkage disequilibrium phase consistence; DAIRY-CATTLE BREEDS; MULTI-BREED; RELIABILITY; ACCURACY; VALUES;
D O I
10.1111/jbg.12089
中图分类号
S8 [畜牧、 动物医学、狩猎、蚕、蜂];
学科分类号
0905 ;
摘要
This study investigated genomic predictions across Nordic Holstein and Nordic Red using various genomic relationship matrices. Different sources of information, such as consistencies of linkage disequilibrium (LD) phase and marker effects, were used to construct the genomic relationship matrices (G-matrices) across these two breeds. Single-trait genomic best linear unbiased prediction (GBLUP) model and two-trait GBLUP model were used for single-breed and two-breed genomic predictions. The data included 5215 Nordic Holstein bulls and 4361 Nordic Red bulls, which was composed of three populations: Danish Red, Swedish Red and Finnish Ayrshire. The bulls were genotyped with 50 000 SNP chip. Using the two-breed predictions with a joint Nordic Holstein and Nordic Red reference population, accuracies increased slightly for all traits in Nordic Red, but only for some traits in Nordic Holstein. Among the three subpopulations of Nordic Red, accuracies increased more for Danish Red than for Swedish Red and Finnish Ayrshire. This is because closer genetic relationships exist between Danish Red and Nordic Holstein. Among Danish Red, individuals with higher genomic relationship coefficients with Nordic Holstein showed more increased accuracies in the two-breed predictions. Weighting the two-breed G-matrices by LD phase consistencies, marker effects or both did not further improve accuracies of the two-breed predictions.
引用
收藏
页码:249 / 257
页数:9
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [21] Genomic selection through single-step genomic best linear unbiased prediction improves the accuracy of evaluation in Hanwoo cattle
    Park, Mi Na
    Alam, Mahboob
    Kim, Sidong
    Park, Byoungho
    Lee, Seung Hwan
    Lee, Sung Soo
    ASIAN-AUSTRALASIAN JOURNAL OF ANIMAL SCIENCES, 2020, 33 (10): : 1544 - 1557
  • [22] Best Linear Unbiased Prediction of Genomic Breeding Values Using a Trait-Specific Marker-Derived Relationship Matrix
    Zhang, Zhe
    Liu, Jianfeng
    Ding, Xiangdong
    Bijma, Piter
    de Koning, Dirk-Jan
    Zhang, Qin
    PLOS ONE, 2010, 5 (09): : 1 - 8
  • [23] The patterns of genomic variances and covariances across genome for milk production traits between Chinese and Nordic Holstein populations
    Li, Xiujin
    Lund, Mogens Sando
    Janss, Luc
    Wang, Chonglong
    Ding, Xiangdong
    Zhang, Qin
    Su, Guosheng
    BMC GENETICS, 2017, 18
  • [24] Optimum contribution selection using traditional best linear unbiased prediction and genomic breeding values in aquaculture breeding schemes
    Nielsen, H. M.
    Sonesson, A. K.
    Meuwissen, T. H. E.
    JOURNAL OF ANIMAL SCIENCE, 2011, 89 (03) : 630 - 638
  • [25] Multibreed genomic evaluation for production traits of dairy cattle in the United States using single-step genomic best linear unbiased predictor
    Cesarani, A.
    Lourenco, D.
    Tsuruta, S.
    Legarra, A.
    Nicolazzi, E. L.
    VanRaden, P. M.
    Misztal, I
    JOURNAL OF DAIRY SCIENCE, 2022, 105 (06) : 5141 - 5152
  • [26] The impact of selective genotyping on the response to selection using single-step genomic best linear unbiased prediction
    Howard, Jeremy T.
    Rathje, Tom A.
    Bruns, Caitlyn E.
    Wilson-Wells, Danielle F.
    Kachman, Stephen D.
    Spangler, Matthew L.
    JOURNAL OF ANIMAL SCIENCE, 2018, 96 (11) : 4532 - 4542
  • [27] Whole-genome sequence-based genomic prediction in laying chickens with different genomic relationship matrices to account for genetic architecture
    Ni, Guiyan
    Cavero, David
    Fangmann, Anna
    Erbe, Malena
    Simianer, Henner
    GENETICS SELECTION EVOLUTION, 2017, 49
  • [28] Multi-Trait, Multi-Environment Genomic Prediction of Durum Wheat With Genomic Best Linear Unbiased Predictor and Deep Learning Methods
    Montesinos-Lopez, Osval A.
    Montesinos-Lopez, Abelardo
    Tuberosa, Roberto
    Maccaferri, Marco
    Sciara, Giuseppe
    Ammar, Karim
    Crossa, Jose
    FRONTIERS IN PLANT SCIENCE, 2019, 10
  • [29] Genetic evaluation using single-step genomic best linear unbiased predictor in American Angus
    Lourenco, D. A. L.
    Tsuruta, S.
    Fragomeni, B. O.
    Masuda, Y.
    Aguilar, I.
    Legarra, A.
    Bertrand, J. K.
    Amen, T. S.
    Wang, L.
    Moser, D. W.
    Misztal, I.
    JOURNAL OF ANIMAL SCIENCE, 2015, 93 (06) : 2653 - 2662
  • [30] Genetic evaluations in cattle using the single-step genomic best linear unbiased predictor
    Amaya Martinez, Alejandro
    Martinez Sarmiento, Rodrigo
    Ceron-Munoz, Mario
    REVISTA CORPOICA-CIENCIA Y TECNOLOGIA AGROPECUARIA, 2020, 21 (01):