An Improved CoCoSo Method with a Maximum Variance Optimization Model for Cloud Service Provider Selection

被引:27
作者
Lai, Han [1 ,2 ]
Liao, Huchang [2 ]
Wen, Zhi [2 ]
Zavadskas, Edmundas Kazimieras [3 ]
Al-Barakati, Abdullah [4 ]
机构
[1] Chongqing Technol & Business Univ, Chongqing Engn Lab Detect Control & Integrated Sy, Chongqing 400067, Peoples R China
[2] Sichuan Univ, Business Sch, Chengdu 610064, Sichuan, Peoples R China
[3] Vilnius Gediminas Tech Univ, Inst Sustainable Construct, Sauletekio Al 11, LT-10223 Vilnius, Lithuania
[4] King Abdulaziz Univ, Fac Comp & Informat Technol, Jeddah 21589, Saudi Arabia
来源
INZINERINE EKONOMIKA-ENGINEERING ECONOMICS | 2020年 / 31卷 / 04期
关键词
Multi-Criteria Decision Making; Cloud Service Provider Selection; Combined Compromise Solution (Cocoso); Maximum Variance; Discrimination Degree; MULTICRITERIA DECISION-MAKING; OF-THE-ART; FRAMEWORK; WASPAS; TRUSTWORTHINESS; NORMALIZATION; RANKING;
D O I
10.5755/j01.ee.31.4.24990
中图分类号
F [经济];
学科分类号
02 ;
摘要
With the rapid growth of available online cloud services and providers for customers, the selection of cloud service providers plays a crucial role in on-demand service selection on a subscription basis. Selecting a suitable cloud service provider requires a careful analysis and a reasonable ranking method. In this study, an improved combined compromise solution (CoCoSo) method is proposed to identify the ranking of cloud service providers. Based on the original CoCoSo method, we analyze the defects of the final aggregation operator in the original CoCoSo method which ignores the equal importance of the three subordinate compromise scores, and employ the operator of "Linear Sum Normalization" to normalize the three subordinate compromise scores so as to make the results reasonable. In addition, we introduce a maximum variance optimization model which can increase the discrimination degree of evaluation results and avoid inconsistent ordering. A numerical example of the trust evaluation of cloud service providers is given to demonstrate the applicability of the proposed method. Furthermore, we perform sensitivity analysis and comparative analysis to justify the accuracy of the decision outcomes derived by the proposed method. Besides, the results of discrimination test also indicate that the proposed method is more effective than the original CoCoSo method in identifying the subtle differences among alternatives.
引用
收藏
页码:411 / 424
页数:14
相关论文
共 66 条
[1]   NMCDA: A framework for evaluating cloud computing services [J].
Abdel-Basset, Mohamed ;
Mohamed, Mai ;
Chang, Victor .
FUTURE GENERATION COMPUTER SYSTEMS-THE INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF ESCIENCE, 2018, 86 :12-29
[2]  
Afshari A., 2010, International Journal of Innovation, Management and Technology, V1, P511, DOI [DOI 10.7763/IJIMT.2010.V1.89, 10.7763/IJIMT.2010.V1.89]
[4]   A hybrid multi criteria decision method for cloud service selection from Smart data [J].
Al-Faifi, Abdullah ;
Song, Biao ;
Hassan, Mohammad Mehedi ;
Alamri, Atif ;
Gumaei, Abdu .
FUTURE GENERATION COMPUTER SYSTEMS-THE INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF ESCIENCE, 2019, 93 :43-57
[5]  
Alabool H.M., 2013, AUST J BASIC APPL SC, V7, P211
[6]   Cloud service evaluation method-based Multi-Criteria Decision-Making: A systematic literature review [J].
Alabool, Hamzeh ;
Kamil, Ahmad ;
Arshad, Noreen ;
Alarabiat, Deemah .
JOURNAL OF SYSTEMS AND SOFTWARE, 2018, 139 :161-188
[7]   An Uncertainty-aware Integrated Fuzzy AHP-WASPAS Model to Evaluate Public Cloud Computing Services [J].
Alam, Khubaib Amjad ;
Ahmed, Rodina ;
Butt, Faisal Shafique ;
Kim, Soon-Gohn ;
Ko, Kwang-Man .
9TH INTERNATIONAL CONFERENCE ON AMBIENT SYSTEMS, NETWORKS AND TECHNOLOGIES (ANT 2018) / THE 8TH INTERNATIONAL CONFERENCE ON SUSTAINABLE ENERGY INFORMATION TECHNOLOGY (SEIT-2018) / AFFILIATED WORKSHOPS, 2018, 130 :504-509
[8]  
Alimardani Maryam, 2014, International Journal of Services and Operations Management, V18, P179, DOI 10.1504/IJSOM.2014.062000
[9]  
Alismaili S, 2016, LECT NOTES ELECTR EN, V375, P597, DOI 10.1007/978-981-10-0539-8_59