The scientifically-minded psychologist: Science as a core competency

被引:43
作者
Bieschke, KJ
Fouad, NA
Collins, FL
Halonen, JS
机构
[1] Penn State Univ, University Pk, PA 16802 USA
[2] Univ Wisconsin, Milwaukee, WI 53201 USA
[3] Oklahoma State Univ, Stillwater, OK 74078 USA
[4] Univ W Florida, Pensacola, FL 32514 USA
关键词
competencies; research; training; scientist-practitioner;
D O I
10.1002/jclp.20012
中图分类号
B849 [应用心理学];
学科分类号
040203 ;
摘要
At the Competencies Conference: Future Directions in Education and Credentialing In Professional Psychology, the Scientific Foundations and Research Competencies Work Group focused on identifying how psychologists practice scientifically. This article presents the subcomponents associated with the core competency of scientific practice. The subcomponents include: 1) access and apply current scientific knowledge habitually and appropriately: 2) contribute to knowledge; 3) critically evaluate interventions and their outcomes: 4) practice vigilance about how sociocultural variables influence scientific practice: and 5) routinely subject work to the scrutiny of colleagues, stakeholders, and the public. In addition, the article briefly discusses how the depth of training for and assessment of each subcomponent will vary by training model. Implications and future directions for individual psychologists, training programs, and the profession are discussed. This is one of a series of articles published in this issue of the Journal of Clinical Psychology Several other articles that resulted from the Competencies Conference will appear in Professional Psychology. Research and Practice and The Counseling Psychologist (C) 2004 Wiley Periodicals, Inc.
引用
收藏
页码:713 / 723
页数:11
相关论文
共 33 条
[2]  
APA, 2001, Publication manual of the American Psychological Association, V5th, DOI DOI 10.1037/0000165-000
[3]   Using patient-focused research in evaluating treatment outcome in private practice [J].
Asay, TP ;
Lambert, MJ ;
Gregersen, AT ;
Goates, MK .
JOURNAL OF CLINICAL PSYCHOLOGY, 2002, 58 (10) :1213-1225
[4]  
Balas E A, 2000, Yearb Med Inform, P65
[5]   NATIONAL CONFERENCE ON SCIENTIST PRACTITIONER EDUCATION AND TRAINING FOR THE PROFESSIONAL PRACTICE OF PSYCHOLOGY [J].
BELAR, CD ;
PERRY, NW .
AMERICAN PSYCHOLOGIST, 1992, 47 (01) :71-75
[6]   American psychology's struggles with its curriculum - Should a thousand flowers bloom? [J].
Benjamin, LT .
AMERICAN PSYCHOLOGIST, 2001, 56 (09) :735-742
[7]  
Berg AO, 2000, EVIDENCE-BASED CLINICAL PRACTICE: CONCEPTS AND APPROACHES, P21
[8]   BRIDGING SCIENTIST AND PRACTITIONER PERSPECTIVES IN CLINICAL-PSYCHOLOGY [J].
BEUTLER, LE ;
WILLIAMS, RE ;
WAKEFIELD, PJ ;
ENTWISTLE, SR .
AMERICAN PSYCHOLOGIST, 1995, 50 (12) :984-994
[9]   David and Goliath -: When empirical and clinical standards of practice meet [J].
Beutler, LE .
AMERICAN PSYCHOLOGIST, 2000, 55 (09) :997-1007
[10]   Integrating science and practice: Reclaiming the science in practice [J].
Carter, JA .
JOURNAL OF CLINICAL PSYCHOLOGY, 2002, 58 (10) :1285-1290