Response of soil invertebrates to disturbance across three resource regions in North Carolina

被引:31
作者
Barbercheck, M. E. [1 ]
Neher, D. A. [2 ]
Anas, O. [2 ]
El-Allaf, S. M. [2 ]
Weicht, T. R.
机构
[1] N Carolina State Univ, Dept Entomol, Raleigh, NC 27695 USA
[2] N Carolina State Univ, Dept Plant Pathol, Raleigh, NC 27695 USA
关键词
Soil; Microarthropods; Collembola; Mites; Enchytraeids; Biological indicators; Environmental monitoring; Biodiversity; Wetlands; 4 CROPPING SYSTEMS; DIVERSITY; COMMUNITIES; FOREST; FAUNA; BIODIVERSITY; INDICATORS; ECOSYSTEM; QUALITY; MESOSTIGMATA;
D O I
10.1007/s10661-008-0315-5
中图分类号
X [环境科学、安全科学];
学科分类号
08 ; 0830 ;
摘要
We evaluated the potential of soil microarthropods and enchytraeid worms to be useful as bioindicators of soil condition in forest, wetland, and agricultural ecosystems over a range of ecoregions. Selected mesofauna and soil characteristics in soil and litter in relatively undisturbed and disturbed examples of each of three ecosystems within each of three land resource regions were monitored over two years. Optimal times of year to sample these organisms as indicators of disturbance were April, May, July and September. No single measure reflected disturbance across all three ecosystems. Among forest sites, Simpson's diversity index, evenness, abundance of ants, and proportion of enchytraeids in the mesofauna differed between soils of different disturbance levels. Among agricultural sites, richness, evenness, abundance of mites, and proportions of collembolans and of enchytraeids in the mesofauna differed between disturbance levels. Among wetland sites, Shannon's and Simpson's diversity indices, richness based on the total mesofauna, and abundances of mites, diplurans, ants, and isotomid and onychiurid collembolans differed between disturbance levels. Covariates most frequently associated with abundance and diversity of the measured mesofauna were soil electrical conductivity, available N, organic matter, and pH. Canonical correspondence analysis provided information somewhat different to bivariate analysis. Using both approaches to examine soil and litter taxa that have distinctive responses to disturbance may help to identify candidate groups applicable for use in large-scale environmental monitoring programs.
引用
收藏
页码:283 / 298
页数:16
相关论文
共 52 条
[11]  
Fiscus DA, 2002, ECOL APPL, V12, P565, DOI 10.1890/1051-0761(2002)012[0565:DSOFLS]2.0.CO
[12]  
2
[13]   THE INFLUENCE OF SOIL TYPE AND CULTIVATION SYSTEM ON THE SPATIAL DISTRIBUTIONS OF THE SOIL FAUNA AND MICROORGANISMS AND THEIR INTERACTIONS [J].
FROMM, H ;
WINTER, K ;
FILSER, J ;
HANTSCHEL, R ;
BEESE, F .
GEODERMA, 1993, 60 (1-4) :109-118
[14]  
HAWKSWORTH DL, 1993, BIODIVERITY BIOSYSTE
[15]   Soil quality: an indicator of sustainable land management? [J].
Herrick, JE .
APPLIED SOIL ECOLOGY, 2000, 15 (01) :75-83
[16]   DIVERSITY AND EVENNESS: A UNIFYING NOTATION AND ITS CONSEQUENCES [J].
HILL, MO .
ECOLOGY, 1973, 54 (02) :427-432
[17]   Residual effects of tillage and crop rotation on soil properties, soil invertebrate numbers and nutrient uptake in an irrigated Vertisol sown to cotton [J].
Hulugalle, NR ;
de Bruyn, LAL ;
Entwistle, P .
APPLIED SOIL ECOLOGY, 1997, 7 (01) :11-30
[18]   Predatory mites (Gamasina, Mesostigmata) [J].
Koehler, HH .
AGRICULTURE ECOSYSTEMS & ENVIRONMENT, 1999, 74 (1-3) :395-410
[19]  
LAGERLOF J, 1988, PEDOBIOLOGIA, V32, P129
[20]   Relationship between soil microarthropod species diversity and plant growth does not change when the system is disturbed [J].
Liiri, M ;
Setälä, H ;
Haimi, J ;
Pennanen, T ;
Fritze, H .
OIKOS, 2002, 96 (01) :137-149