Evidence for induced systemic protection to fusiform rust in loblolly pine by plant growth-promoting rhizobacteria

被引:38
|
作者
Enebak, SA [1 ]
Carey, WA [1 ]
机构
[1] Auburn Univ, Sch Forestry & Wildlife Sci, Auburn, AL 36849 USA
关键词
ISR; Pinus taeda;
D O I
10.1094/PDIS.2000.84.3.306
中图分类号
Q94 [植物学];
学科分类号
071001 ;
摘要
Trials conducted in 1997 and 1998 tested eight strains of plans growth-promoting rhizobacteria (PGPR) for their capacity to induce systemic protection in loblolly pine to the causal agent of fusiform rust. Pine seeds were treated with bacteria at time of sowing, and seedlings were artificially inoculated with basidiospores of Cronartium quercuum f. sp. fusiforme 1 month Inter. Six months after basidiospore inoculation, seedlings were evaluated for the fusoid swelling or galls characteristic of rust infection. Compared with seedlings from seed not treated with bacteria, two bacterial isolates, Bacillus pumilus (SE34) and Serratia marcescens (90-166), significantly (P = 0.05) reduced the number of galls in 1997 and 1998. Combined data from 1997 and 1998 resulted in two additional isolates, B. pumilus (INR7) and B. pumilus (SE52), significantly (P = 0.05) reducing the number of galls. Averaged over both years, 31% of control seedlings were infected with fusiform rust, while those seedlings treated with bacterial strains SE34, 90-166, INR7, and SE52 had 13, 14, 15, and 16% infection, respectively. These four PGPR strains ap pear to have induced systemic resistance to fusiform rust in loblolly pine, resulting in less infection over nontreated control seedlings.
引用
收藏
页码:306 / 308
页数:3
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [31] Plant growth-promoting rhizobacteria and root system functioning
    Vacheron, Jordan
    Desbrosses, Guilhem
    Bouffaud, Marie-Lara
    Touraine, Bruno
    Moenne-Loccoz, Yvan
    Muller, Daniel
    Legendre, Laurent
    Wisniewski-Dye, Florence
    Prigent-Combaret, Claire
    FRONTIERS IN PLANT SCIENCE, 2013, 4
  • [32] Plant growth-promoting rhizobacteria used in South Korea
    Jerald Conrad Ibal
    Byung Kwon Jung
    Chang Eon Park
    Jae-Ho Shin
    Applied Biological Chemistry, 2018, 61 : 709 - 716
  • [33] Biocontrol of tomato wilt by plant growth-promoting rhizobacteria
    Guo, JH
    Qi, HY
    Guo, YH
    Ge, HL
    Gong, LY
    Zhang, LX
    Sun, PH
    BIOLOGICAL CONTROL, 2004, 29 (01) : 66 - 72
  • [34] Plant growth-promoting rhizobacteria (PGPR): emergence in agriculture
    P. N. Bhattacharyya
    D. K. Jha
    World Journal of Microbiology and Biotechnology, 2012, 28 : 1327 - 1350
  • [35] Evaluation of plant growth-promoting rhizobacteria on stockpiled bermudagrass
    Griffin, Megan E.
    Muntifering, Russell B.
    Mullenix, Mary K.
    Held, David W.
    Dillard, Sandra L.
    CROP FORAGE & TURFGRASS MANAGEMENT, 2020, 6 (01)
  • [36] New advances in plant growth-promoting rhizobacteria for bioremediation
    Zhuang, Xuliang
    Chen, Jian
    Shim, Hojae
    Bai, Zhihui
    ENVIRONMENT INTERNATIONAL, 2007, 33 (03) : 406 - 413
  • [37] BIOTECHNOLOGICAL POTENTIAL OF SOYBEAN PLANT GROWTH-PROMOTING RHIZOBACTERIA
    de Paula, Gabriel Ferreira
    Demetrio, Gilberto Bueno
    Matsumoto, Leopoldo Sussumu
    REVISTA CAATINGA, 2021, 34 (02) : 328 - 338
  • [38] Photoperiod regulates elicitation of growth promotion but not induced resistance by plant growth-promoting rhizobacteria
    Kloepper, J. W.
    Gutierrez-Estrada, A.
    McInroy, J. A.
    CANADIAN JOURNAL OF MICROBIOLOGY, 2007, 53 (02) : 159 - 167
  • [39] Plant growth-promoting rhizobacteria act as biostimulants in horticulture
    Ruzzi, Maurizio
    Aroca, Ricardo
    SCIENTIA HORTICULTURAE, 2015, 196 : 124 - 134
  • [40] Plant Growth-Promoting Rhizobacteria for Sustainable Agricultural Production
    de Andrade, Luana Alves
    Santos, Carlos Henrique Barbosa
    Frezarin, Edvan Teciano
    Sales, Luziane Ramos
    Rigobelo, Everlon Cid
    MICROORGANISMS, 2023, 11 (04)