On the transaction dynamics of the Ethereum-based cryptocurrency

被引:6
作者
Gaviao Mascarenhas, Juliana Zanelatto [1 ]
Ziviani, Artur [1 ]
Wehmuth, Klaus [1 ]
Vieira, Alex Borges [2 ]
机构
[1] Natl Lab Sci Comp LNCC, Dept Computat & Math Methods, Petropolis, RJ, Brazil
[2] Univ Fed Juiz de Fora UFJF, Comp Sci Dept, Juiz De Fora, Brazil
基金
巴西圣保罗研究基金会;
关键词
blockchain; Ethereum; cryptocurrency; transaction network; network science; time-varying graph; multi-aspect graph;
D O I
10.1093/comnet/cnaa042
中图分类号
O1 [数学];
学科分类号
0701 ; 070101 ;
摘要
Distributed blockchain-based consensus platforms have witnessed steady growth in recent years. In special, cryptocurrency is one of the main applications of the blockchain technology. Despite the recent interest in blockchain, we still lack in-depth analysis of systems that use such a technology. In fact, most of the existing works focus on Bitcoin. Moreover, blockchain-based cryptocurrency systems are highly dynamic. Their internal mechanisms and consensus algorithms evolve over time. Users also change their interests in a given platform, which in turn, reflect their behaviour. In this article, we model the Ethereum-based cryptocurrency transaction network, a more recent blockchain platform that is gaining a significant share in the cryptocurrency market. We model the transactions of Ethereum as a complex system, representing this complex system as a time-varying graph. Our model and the analysis we conduct rely on a 3-year dataset of Ethereum-based cryptocurrency transactions, comprising more than 38 million users (i.e. unique wallet addresses) and almost 300 million transactions. We analyse the evolution of users and transactions over time. Our study also highlights the centralization tendency of the transaction network on both user and time aspects. Finally, we also analyse the formation of communities and the evolution of connected components considering the dynamics of the Ethereum-based cryptocurrency transaction network.
引用
收藏
页数:26
相关论文
共 25 条
  • [1] Alonso K.M., 2020, Zero to monero
  • [2] Fast unfolding of communities in large networks
    Blondel, Vincent D.
    Guillaume, Jean-Loup
    Lambiotte, Renaud
    Lefebvre, Etienne
    [J]. JOURNAL OF STATISTICAL MECHANICS-THEORY AND EXPERIMENT, 2008,
  • [3] Buterin V., 2014, A nextgeneration smart contract and decentralized application platform, DOI DOI 10.1145/2939672.2939785
  • [4] Chan W, 2017, INT CONF INTERNET, P498, DOI 10.23919/ICITST.2017.8356459
  • [5] Understanding Ethereum via Graph Analysis
    Chen, Ting
    Li, Zihao
    Zhu, Yuxiao
    Chen, Jiachi
    Luo, Xiapu
    Lui, John Chi-Shing
    Lin, Xiaodong
    Zhang, Xiaosong
    [J]. ACM TRANSACTIONS ON INTERNET TECHNOLOGY, 2020, 20 (02)
  • [6] Blockchains and Smart Contracts for the Internet of Things
    Christidis, Konstantinos
    Devetsikiotis, Michael
    [J]. IEEE ACCESS, 2016, 4 : 2292 - 2303
  • [7] An analysis of the fees and pending time correlation in Ethereum
    de Azevedo Sousa, Jose Eduardo
    Oliveira, Vinicius
    Valadares, Julia
    Dias Goncalves, Glauber
    Moraes Villela, Saulo
    Soares Bernardino, Heder
    Borges Vieira, Alex
    [J]. INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF NETWORK MANAGEMENT, 2021, 31 (03)
  • [8] Majority Is Not Enough: Bitcoin Mining Is Vulnerable
    Eyal, Ittay
    Sirer, Emin Guen
    [J]. FINANCIAL CRYPTOGRAPHY AND DATA SECURITY, FC 2014, 2014, 8437 : 436 - 454
  • [9] Temporal networks
    Holme, Petter
    Saramaki, Jari
    [J]. PHYSICS REPORTS-REVIEW SECTION OF PHYSICS LETTERS, 2012, 519 (03): : 97 - 125
  • [10] Analyzing Ethereum's Contract Topology
    Kiffer, Lucianna
    Levin, Dave
    Mislove, Alan
    [J]. IMC'18: PROCEEDINGS OF THE INTERNET MEASUREMENT CONFERENCE, 2018, : 494 - 499