Impact of the Sloping Land Conversion Program on rural household income: An integrated estimation

被引:69
|
作者
Lin, Ying [1 ]
Yao, Shunbo [1 ]
机构
[1] Northwest A&F Univ, Coll Econ & Management, Res Ctr Resource Econ & Environm Management, Yangling, Shaanxi, Peoples R China
关键词
Labor transfer; Liquidity constraint; Household income; Structural equation model; ECOSYSTEM SERVICES; PAYMENTS; GREEN; GRAIN;
D O I
10.1016/j.landusepol.2013.09.005
中图分类号
X [环境科学、安全科学];
学科分类号
08 ; 0830 ;
摘要
The objective of this study is to identify the pathways of the potential impacts of the Sloping Land Conversion Program (SLCP) on household income and quantify these impacts along the identified pathways. We fulfill this objective by developing an integrated analytic framework and using data collected from Wuqi county of Shaanxi for the period 2004-2010. This integrated analytic framework enables us to formulate a structural equation model for testing hypotheses regarding the direct and indirect impacts of the SLCP. It is found that the direct effect of the SLCP on household income is positive but very small and insignificant, suggesting that retiring cropland has, at least, not reduced income from farming. Moreover, the SLCP has had a much higher and even increasing indirect impact on household income through promoting labor transfer and relaxing liquidity constraints. Overall, the SLCP's total impact on household income ranged from 3% in 2004 to 9% in 2010 excluding the insignificant direct impact. The research and policy implications of our work are discussed. (C) 2013 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.
引用
收藏
页码:56 / 63
页数:8
相关论文
共 44 条
  • [31] High prevalence of hyperglycaemia and the impact of high household income in transforming Rural China
    Chaowei Fu
    Yue Chen
    Fadi Wang
    Xuecai Wang
    Jiangen Song
    Qingwu Jiang
    BMC Public Health, 11
  • [32] Algorithm of Ecocompensation in Sloping Land Conversion Program Based on Heckman's Two-Step Model
    Wang, Haotian
    Ke, Chen
    Yang, Xiaojun
    SCIENTIFIC PROGRAMMING, 2021, 2021
  • [33] Do farmers or governments make better land conservation choices? Evidence from China's Sloping Land Conversion Program
    Kelly, Peter
    Huo, Xuexi
    JOURNAL OF FOREST ECONOMICS, 2013, 19 (01) : 32 - 60
  • [34] How Eco-Efficiency Is the Forestry Ecological Restoration Program? The Case of the Sloping Land Conversion Program in the Loess Plateau, China
    Deng, Yuanjie
    Cai, Wencong
    Hou, Mengyang
    Zhang, Xiaolong
    Xu, Shiyuan
    Yao, Nan
    Guo, Yajun
    Li, Hua
    Yao, Shunbo
    LAND, 2022, 11 (05)
  • [35] Households' Decisions to Participate in China's Sloping Land Conversion Program and Reallocate Their Labour Times: Is There Endogeneity Bias?
    Yin, Runsheng
    Liu, Hao
    Liu, Can
    Lu, Gang
    ECOLOGICAL ECONOMICS, 2018, 145 : 380 - 390
  • [36] Access to Financial Services and Its Impact on Household Income: Evidence from Rural Ghana
    Twumasi, Martinson Ankrah
    Zheng, Hongyun
    Asiedu-Ayeh, Love Offeibea
    Siaw, Anthony
    Jiang, Yuansheng
    EUROPEAN JOURNAL OF DEVELOPMENT RESEARCH, 2023, 35 (04) : 869 - 890
  • [37] Access to Financial Services and Its Impact on Household Income: Evidence from Rural Ghana
    Martinson Ankrah Twumasi
    Hongyun Zheng
    Love Offeibea Asiedu-Ayeh
    Anthony Siaw
    Yuansheng Jiang
    The European Journal of Development Research, 2023, 35 : 869 - 890
  • [38] Policy improvements and farmers' willingness to participate: Insights from the new round of China's Sloping Land Conversion Program
    Zhang, Zhaohui
    Paudel, Krishna P.
    ECOLOGICAL ECONOMICS, 2019, 162 : 121 - 132
  • [39] How do land rental markets affect household income? Evidence from rural Jiangsu, PR China
    Zhang, Lan
    Feng, Shuyi
    Heerink, Nico
    Qu, Futian
    Kuyvenhoven, Arie
    LAND USE POLICY, 2018, 74 : 151 - 165
  • [40] Does household composition matter? The impact of the Grain for Green Program on rural livelihoods in China
    Liang, Yicheng
    Li, Shuzhuo
    Feldman, Marcus W.
    Daily, Gretchen C.
    ECOLOGICAL ECONOMICS, 2012, 75 : 152 - 160