Technique and Outcomes of Robot-assisted Retroperitoneoscopic Partial Nephrectomy: A Multicenter Study

被引:64
作者
Hu, Jim C. [1 ]
Treat, Eric [1 ]
Filson, Christopher P. [1 ]
McLaren, Ian [2 ]
Xiong, Siwei [1 ]
Stepanian, Sevan [3 ]
Hafez, Khaled S. [2 ]
Weizer, Alon Z. [2 ]
Porter, James [3 ]
机构
[1] Univ Calif Los Angeles, David Geffen Sch Med, Dept Urol, Los Angeles, CA 90095 USA
[2] Univ Michigan, Dept Urol, Ann Arbor, MI 48109 USA
[3] Swedish Med Ctr, Seattle, WA USA
关键词
Renal cell carcinoma; Partial nephrectomy; Robotic surgery; Retroperitoneal approach; Outcomes; LAPAROSCOPIC PARTIAL NEPHRECTOMY; SMALL RENAL MASSES; PERIOPERATIVE OUTCOMES; LEARNING-CURVE; SURGEON VOLUME; OBESE-PATIENTS; TRANSPERITONEAL; COHORT; TUMORS; COMPLICATIONS;
D O I
10.1016/j.eururo.2014.04.028
中图分类号
R5 [内科学]; R69 [泌尿科学(泌尿生殖系疾病)];
学科分类号
1002 ; 100201 ;
摘要
Background: Robot-assisted retroperitoneoscopic partial nephrectomy (RARPN) may be used for posterior renal masses or with prior abdominal surgery; however, there is relatively less familiarity with RARPN. Objective: To demonstrate RARPN technique and outcomes. Design, setting, and participants: A retrospective multicenter study of 227 consecutive RARPNs was performed at the Swedish Medical Center, the University of Michigan, and the University of California, Los Angeles, from 2006 to 2013. Surgical procedure: RARPN. Outcome measurements and statistical analysis: We assessed positive margins and cancer recurrence. Stepwise regression was used to examine factors associated with complications, estimated blood loss (EBL), warm ischemia time (WIT), operative time (OT), and length of stay (LOS). Results and limitations: The median age was 60 yr (interquartile range [IQR]: 52-66), and the median body mass index (BMI) was 28.2 kg/m(2) (IQR: 25.6-32.6). Median maximum tumor diameter was 2.3 cm (IQR: 1.7-3.1). Median OT and WIT were 165 min(IQR: 134-200) and 19 min (IQR: 16-24), respectively; median EBL was 75 ml (IQR: 50-150), and median LOS was 2 d (IQR: 1-3). Twenty-eight subjects (12.3%) experienced complications, three (1.3%) had urine leaks, and three (1.3%) had pseudoaneurysms that required reintervention. There was one conversion to radical nephrectomy and three transfusions. Overall, 143 clear cell carcinomas (62.6%) composed most of the histology with eight positive margins (3.5%) and two recurrences (0.9%) with a median follow-up of 2.7 yr. In adjusted analyses, intersurgeon variation was associated with complications (odds ratio [OR]: 3.66; 95% confidence interval, 1.31-10.27; p = 0.014) and WIT (parameter estimate [PE; plus or minus standard error]: 4.84 +/- 2.14; p = 0.025). Higher surgeon volume was associated with shorter WIT (PE: -0.06 +/- 0.02; p = 0.002). Higher BMI was associated with longer OT (PE: 2.09 +/- 0.56; p < 0.001). Longer OT was associated with longer LOS (PE: 0.01 +/- 0.01; p = 0.002). Finally, there was a trend for intersurgeon variation in OT (PE: 18.5 +/- 10.3; p = 0.075). Conclusions: RARPN has acceptable morbidity and oncologic outcomes, despite intersurgeon variation in WIT and complications. Greater experience is associated with shorter WIT. Patient summary: Robot-assisted retroperitoneoscopic partial nephrectomy has acceptable morbidity and oncologic outcomes, and there is intersurgeon variation in warm ischemia time and complications. (C) 2014 European Association of Urology. Published by Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved.
引用
收藏
页码:542 / 549
页数:8
相关论文
共 40 条
[31]   Robotic retroperitoneal partial nephrectomy [J].
Patel, Mayank ;
Porter, James .
WORLD JOURNAL OF UROLOGY, 2013, 31 (06) :1377-1382
[32]   Robotic-assisted Versus Traditional Laparoscopic Partial Nephrectomy: Comparison of Outcomes and Evaluation of Learning Curve [J].
Pierorazio, Phillip M. ;
Patel, Hiten D. ;
Feng, Tom ;
Yohannan, Jithin ;
Hyams, Elias S. ;
Allaf, Mohamad E. .
UROLOGY, 2011, 78 (04) :813-819
[33]   Retroperitoneal laparoscopic partial nephrectomy: Surgical experience and outcomes [J].
Pyo, P. ;
Chen, A. ;
Grasso, M. .
JOURNAL OF UROLOGY, 2008, 180 (04) :1279-1283
[34]   Operative Outcomes of Robotic Partial Nephrectomy: A Comparison with Conventional Laparoscopic Partial Nephrectomy [J].
Seo, Ill Young ;
Choi, Hoon ;
Boldbaatr, Yanjmaa ;
Lee, Jea Whan ;
Rim, Joung Sik .
KOREAN JOURNAL OF UROLOGY, 2011, 52 (04) :279-283
[35]   Complications and Failure to Rescue After Laparoscopic Versus Open Radical Nephrectomy [J].
Tan, Hung-Jui ;
Wolf, J. Stuart, Jr. ;
Ye, Zaojun ;
Wei, John T. ;
Miller, David C. .
JOURNAL OF UROLOGY, 2011, 186 (04) :1254-1260
[36]   Every Minute Counts When the Renal Hilum Is Clamped During Partial Nephrectomy [J].
Thompson, R. Houston ;
Lane, Brian R. ;
Lohse, Christine M. ;
Leibovich, Bradley C. ;
Fergany, Amr ;
Frank, Igor ;
Gill, Inderbir S. ;
Blute, Michael L. ;
Campbell, Steven C. .
EUROPEAN UROLOGY, 2010, 58 (03) :340-345
[37]   Robot-Assisted Retroperitoneal Partial Nephrectomy: Technique and Perioperative Results [J].
Weizer, Alon Z. ;
Palella, Gaetano V. ;
Montgomery, Jeffrey S. ;
Miller, David C. ;
Hafez, Khaled S. .
JOURNAL OF ENDOUROLOGY, 2011, 25 (04) :553-557
[38]   Robotic partial nephrectomy versus laparoscopic partial nephrectomy: a single laparoscopic trained surgeon's experience in the development of a robotic partial nephrectomy program [J].
Williams, Stephen B. ;
Kacker, Ravi ;
Alemozaffar, Mehrdad ;
San Francisco, Ignacio ;
Mechaber, Jodi ;
Wagner, Andrew A. .
WORLD JOURNAL OF UROLOGY, 2013, 31 (04) :793-798
[39]   Laparoscopic partial nephrectomy: Comparison of transperitoneal and retroperitoneal approaches [J].
Wright, JL ;
Porter, JR .
JOURNAL OF UROLOGY, 2005, 174 (03) :841-845
[40]   Use, Costs and Comparative Effectiveness of Robotic Assisted, Laparoscopic and Open Urological Surgery [J].
Yu, Hua-yin ;
Hevelone, Nathanael D. ;
Lipsitz, Stuart R. ;
Kowalczyk, Keith J. ;
Hu, Jim C. .
JOURNAL OF UROLOGY, 2012, 187 (04) :1392-1398