Project Quality Assurance Organization Selection for Highway Design and Construction Projects

被引:5
作者
Kraft, Elizabeth [1 ]
Molenaar, Keith R. [2 ]
机构
[1] Dye Management Grp, Bellevue, WA 98004 USA
[2] Univ Colorado, Dept Civil Environm & Architectural Engn, Boulder, CO 80309 USA
关键词
MANAGEMENT; DELIVERY;
D O I
10.3141/2347-04
中图分类号
TU [建筑科学];
学科分类号
0813 ;
摘要
The assignment of project quality roles and responsibilities in the highway industry makes up a project quality assurance organization (QAO). Historically, all project quality roles and responsibilities have been assigned to the state highway agency (SHA), an accepted and well-understood practice in the industry. However, increasing use of alternative project delivery methods and reductions in SHA staffing are having an impact on traditional QAO practices. In response, SHAs are increasingly selecting QAOs in an informal manner because of time constraints, limited staff knowledge and experience, and a lack of guidance from the research community. Most highway quality research focuses on inspections, observations, corporate quality, warranties, and materials testing, with a resulting gap in the research about shifts in roles and responsibilities in project QAOs. This research attempts to bridge this gap by investigating and identifying fundamental QAOs in the industry, identifying factors that influence the selection of QAOs, exploring relationships between QAOs and selection factors, and presenting a systematic process to assist SHAs in selecting QAOs. The process presented in this paper provides a consistent, efficient, justifiable, and defensible approach for selecting project QAOs. The QAO selection process also provides SHAs with opportunities for identifying, discussing, and understanding potential impacts of different QAOs on different projects.
引用
收藏
页码:29 / 37
页数:9
相关论文
共 26 条
  • [1] AASHTO, 2008, AASHTO Guide for Design-Build Procurement 2008
  • [2] [Anonymous], NCHRP SYNTHESIS HIGH
  • [3] [Anonymous], 1997, International Journal of Project Management, DOI DOI 10.1016/S0263-7863(96)00076-2
  • [4] Arditi D., 2004, Construction Management and Economics, V22, P123, DOI DOI 10.1080/0144619042000201321
  • [5] QUALITY MANAGEMENT IN CONSTRUCTION-INDUSTRY
    BURATI, JL
    MATTHEWS, MF
    KALIDINDI, SN
    [J]. JOURNAL OF CONSTRUCTION ENGINEERING AND MANAGEMENT-ASCE, 1991, 117 (02): : 341 - 359
  • [6] QUALITY MANAGEMENT ORGANIZATION AND TECHNIQUES
    BURATI, JL
    MATTHEWS, MF
    KALIDINDI, SN
    [J]. JOURNAL OF CONSTRUCTION ENGINEERING AND MANAGEMENT-ASCE, 1992, 118 (01): : 112 - 128
  • [7] CAUSES OF QUALITY DEVIATIONS IN DESIGN AND CONSTRUCTION
    BURATI, JL
    FARRINGTON, JJ
    LEDBETTER, WB
    [J]. JOURNAL OF CONSTRUCTION ENGINEERING AND MANAGEMENT-ASCE, 1992, 118 (01): : 34 - 49
  • [8] ISO 9000 and the US construction industry
    Chini, AR
    Valdez, HE
    [J]. JOURNAL OF MANAGEMENT IN ENGINEERING, 2003, 19 (02) : 69 - 77
  • [9] Deffenbaugh R.L., 1993, Journal of Management in Engineering, V9, P382, DOI DOI 10.1061/(ASCE)9742-597X(1993)9
  • [10] Strategic use of quality function deployment (QFD) in the construction industry
    Dikmen, I
    Birgonul, MT
    Kiziltas, S
    [J]. BUILDING AND ENVIRONMENT, 2005, 40 (02) : 245 - 255