A Novel Pricing Mechanism for User Coalition in Blockchain

被引:4
作者
Jiang, Yi [1 ]
Liu, Xu [1 ,2 ]
Dai, Jun [1 ]
机构
[1] Yangzhou Univ, Sch Informat Engn, Yangzhou 225127, Jiangsu, Peoples R China
[2] Victoria Univ, Sch Business, Melbourne, Vic 3011, Australia
基金
中国国家自然科学基金;
关键词
Budget control - Costs;
D O I
10.1155/2020/8885179
中图分类号
TP [自动化技术、计算机技术];
学科分类号
0812 ;
摘要
As the blockchain platform is widely used as a new trading way, both participants and transaction volume in the blockchain projects have been growing by leaps and bounds. The generic mechanisms of ranking transaction priorities are heavily dependent on the transaction fees the users append into each transaction; then, all transactions are ranked in the nonincreasing order according to the transaction fee amounts, and the selected transactions will be packed into a new created block in order based on the ranking results. However, more complex influence factors more than transaction fees on transaction priority ranking results are not taken into consideration in the generic transaction priority ranking mechanisms, and a single user is the objective to create transactions in these mechanisms. In order to optimize the generic transaction priority ranking mechanisms and enrich transaction creation modes, a novel user-coalition-based transaction pricing mechanism (UCTPM) is proposed, and the user coalition quality score, user coalition contribution degree, and the transaction type demand degree are formulated and introduced into the UCTPM mechanism. Our research findings indicate that the UCTPM mechanism satisfies the economic attributes of budget balanced, individual rationality, and incentive compatibility when the user coalition contribution degree increases through theoretical proof and experimental analysis. Moreover, the UCTPM mechanism allows all the transactions to be processed more efficiently by experimental analysis.
引用
收藏
页数:12
相关论文
共 23 条
[1]   Blockchain Technology in Healthcare: A Systematic Review [J].
Agbo, Cornelius C. ;
Mahmoud, Qusay H. ;
Eklund, J. Mikael .
HEALTHCARE, 2019, 7 (02)
[2]  
Al-Shehabi Abdullah, 2018, BITCOIN T FEE ESTIMA
[3]  
[Anonymous], 2020, BITCOIN TRANSACTION
[4]   Studying Transaction Fees in the Bitcoin Blockchain with Probabilistic Logic Programming [J].
Azzolini, Damiano ;
Riguzzi, Fabrizio ;
Lamma, Evelina .
INFORMATION, 2019, 10 (11)
[5]  
Benkler Y., 2006, The Wealth of Networks: How Social Production Transforms Markets and Freedom
[6]   Blockchain Network Based Topic Mining Process for Cognitive Manufacturing [J].
Chung, Kyungyong ;
Yoo, Hyun ;
Choe, Doeun ;
Jung, Hoill .
WIRELESS PERSONAL COMMUNICATIONS, 2019, 105 (02) :583-597
[7]   From chaining blocks to breaking even: A study on the profitability of bitcoin mining from 2012 to 2016 [J].
Derks, Jona ;
Gordijn, Jaap ;
Siegmann, Arjen .
ELECTRONIC MARKETS, 2018, 28 (03) :321-338
[8]   From mining to markets: The evolution of bitcoin transaction fees [J].
Easley, David ;
O'Hara, Maureen ;
Basu, Soumya .
JOURNAL OF FINANCIAL ECONOMICS, 2019, 134 (01) :91-109
[9]   A Bitcoin payment network with reduced transaction fees and confirmation times [J].
Erdin, Enes ;
Cebe, Mumin ;
Akkaya, Kemal ;
Solak, Senay ;
Bulut, Eyuphan ;
Uluagac, Selcuk .
COMPUTER NETWORKS, 2020, 172
[10]  
Houy N., 2014, The economics of bitcoin transaction fees, DOI DOI 10.2139/SSRN.2400519