Alarm symptoms and identification of non-cancer diagnoses in primary care: cohort study

被引:53
作者
Jones, Roger [1 ,2 ]
Charlton, Judith [3 ,4 ]
Latinovic, Radoslav [3 ,4 ]
Gulliford, Martin C. [1 ,2 ]
机构
[1] Kings Coll London, Sch Med Guys, Dept Gen Practice & Primary Care, Div Hlth & Social Care Res, London SE11 6SP, England
[2] St Thomas Hosp, London SE11 6SP, England
[3] St Thomas Hosp, London SE1 3QD, England
[4] Kings Coll London, Sch Med Guys, Dept Publ Hlth Sci, Div Hlth & Social Care Res, London SE1 3QD, England
来源
BRITISH MEDICAL JOURNAL | 2009年 / 339卷
关键词
PRACTICE RESEARCH DATABASE; PROTON PUMP INHIBITOR; GENERAL-PRACTICE; HELICOBACTER-PYLORI; COLORECTAL-CANCER; COMMON SYMPTOMS; INFORMATION; VALIDATION; HEMATURIA; DYSPEPSIA;
D O I
10.1136/bmj.b3094
中图分类号
R5 [内科学];
学科分类号
1002 ; 100201 ;
摘要
Objective To evaluate the predictive value of alarm symptoms for specified non-cancer diagnoses and cancer diagnoses in primary care. Design Cohort study using the general practice research database. Setting 128 general practices in the UK contributing data, 1994-2000. Participants 762 325 patients aged 15 or older. Main outcome measures Up to 15 pre-specified, non-cancer diagnoses associated with four alarm symptoms ( haematuria, haemoptysis, dysphagia, rectal bleeding) at 90 days and three years after the first recorded alarm symptom. For each outcome analyses were implemented separately in a time to event framework. Data were censored if patients died, left the practice, or reached the end of the study period. Results We analysed data on first episodes of haematuria ( 11 108), haemoptysis (4812), dysphagia (5999), or rectal bleeding ( 15 289). Non-cancer diagnoses were commonin patients who presented with alarm symptoms. The proportion diagnosed with either cancer or non-cancer diagnoses generally increased with age. In patients presenting with haematuria, the proportions diagnosed with either cancer or non-cancer diagnoses within 90 days were 17.5% (95% confidence interval 16.4% to 18.6%) in women and 18.3% (17.4% to 19.3%) in men. For the other symptoms the proportions were 25.7% (23.8% to 27.8%) and 24% (22.5% to 25.6%) for haemoptysis, 17.2% (16% to 18.5%) and 22.6% (21% to 24.3%) for dysphagia, and 14.5% (13.7% to 15.3%) and 16.7% (15.8% to 17.5%) for rectal bleeding. Conclusion Clinically relevant diagnoses are made in a high proportion of patients presenting with alarm symptoms. For every four to seven patients evaluated for haematuria, haemoptysis, dysphagia, or rectal bleeding, relevant diagnoses will be identified in one patient within 90 days.
引用
收藏
页码:491 / 493
页数:9
相关论文
共 29 条
[1]   Diagnostic scope of and exposure to primary care physicians in Australia, New Zealand, and the United States: cross sectional analysis of results from, three national surveys [J].
Bindman, Andrew B. ;
Forrest, Christopher B. ;
Britt, Helena ;
Crampton, Peter ;
Majeed, Azeem .
BMJ-BRITISH MEDICAL JOURNAL, 2007, 334 (7606) :1261-1264B
[2]  
Bruyninckx R, 2003, BRIT J GEN PRACT, V53, P31
[3]   RETRACTED: Initial management strategies for dyspepsia (Retracted Article) [J].
Delaney, B. ;
Ford, A. C. ;
Forman, D. ;
Moayyedi, P. ;
Qume, M. .
COCHRANE DATABASE OF SYSTEMATIC REVIEWS, 2005, (04)
[4]   Helicobacter pylori test and treat versus proton pump inhibitor in initial management of dyspepsia in primary care:: multicentre randomised controlled trial (MRC-CUBE trial) [J].
Delaney, Brendan C. ;
Qume, Michelle ;
Moayyedi, Paul ;
Logan, Richard F. A. ;
Ford, Alexander C. ;
Elliott, Cathy ;
McNulty, Cliodna ;
Wilson, Sue ;
Hobbs, F. D. Richard .
BMJ-BRITISH MEDICAL JOURNAL, 2008, 336 (7645) :651-654B
[5]  
ELSTEIN AS, 1981, J MED EDUC, V56, P75
[6]   Use of the General Practice Research Database (GPRD) for respiratory epidemiology: a comparison with the 4th Morbidity Survey in General Practice (MSGP4) [J].
Hansell, A ;
Hollowell, J ;
Nichols, T ;
McNiece, R ;
Strachan, D .
THORAX, 1999, 54 (05) :413-419
[7]  
Hollowell J, 1997, Popul Trends, P36
[8]  
Jarbol DE, 2006, AM J GASTROENTEROL, V101, P1200, DOI [10.1111/j.1572-0241.2006.00673.x, 10.1038/ajg2006227]
[9]   VALIDATION OF INFORMATION RECORDED ON GENERAL-PRACTITIONER BASED COMPUTERIZED DATA RESOURCE IN THE UNITED-KINGDOM [J].
JICK, H ;
JICK, SS ;
DERBY, LE .
BRITISH MEDICAL JOURNAL, 1991, 302 (6779) :766-768
[10]   Validity of the General Practice Research Database [J].
Jick, SS ;
Kaye, JA ;
Vasilakis-Scaramozza, C ;
Rodríguez, LAG ;
Ruigómez, A ;
Meier, CR ;
Schlienger, RG ;
Black, C ;
Jick, H .
PHARMACOTHERAPY, 2003, 23 (05) :686-689