Evolution of Students' Varied Conceptualizations About Socially Responsible Engineering: A Four Year Longitudinal Study

被引:18
作者
Rulifson, Greg [1 ]
Bielefeldt, Angela R. [2 ]
机构
[1] Colorado Sch Mines, 1500 Illinois St, Golden, CO 80401 USA
[2] Univ Colorado, 428 UCB, Boulder, CO 80309 USA
基金
美国国家科学基金会;
关键词
Social responsibility; Qualitative research; Engineering ethics; Longitudinal study; EDUCATION;
D O I
10.1007/s11948-018-0042-4
中图分类号
B82 [伦理学(道德学)];
学科分类号
摘要
Engineers should learn how to act on their responsibility to society during their education. At present, however, it is unknown what students think about the meaning of socially responsible engineering. This paper synthesizes 4years of longitudinal interviews with engineering students as they progressed through college. The interviews revolved broadly around how students saw the connections between engineering and social responsibility, and what influenced these ideas. Using the Weidman Input-Environment-Output model as a framework, this research found that influences included required classes such as engineering ethics, capstone design, and some technical courses, pre-college volunteering and familial values, co-curricular groups such as Engineers Without Borders and the Society of Women Engineers, as well as professional experiences through internships. Further, some experiences such as technical courses and engineering internships contributed to confine students' understanding of an engineer's social responsibility. Overall, students who stayed in engineering tended to converge on basic responsibilities such as safety and bettering society as a whole, but tended to become less concerned with improving the lives of the marginalized and disadvantaged. Company loyalty also became important for some students. These results have valuable, transferable contributions, providing guidance to foster students' ideas on socially responsible engineering.
引用
收藏
页码:939 / 974
页数:36
相关论文
共 62 条
[21]  
Canney N, 2013, PROC FRONT EDUC CONF
[22]   Validity and Reliability Evidence of the Engineering Professional Responsibility Assessment Tool [J].
Canney, Nathan E. ;
Bielefeldt, Angela R. .
JOURNAL OF ENGINEERING EDUCATION, 2016, 105 (03) :452-477
[23]   What is an Engineer? Implications of Elementary School Student Conceptions for Engineering Education [J].
Capobianco, Brenda M. ;
Diefes-Dux, Heidi A. ;
Mena, Irene ;
Weller, Jessica .
JOURNAL OF ENGINEERING EDUCATION, 2011, 100 (02) :304-328
[24]  
Capobianco BrendaM. Ji Hyun Yu., 2014, Journal of Women and Minorities in Science and Engineering, V20, P21
[25]   Culture of Disengagement in Engineering Education? [J].
Cech, Erin A. .
SCIENCE TECHNOLOGY & HUMAN VALUES, 2014, 39 (01) :42-72
[26]  
Chism N.V., 2008, Qualitative research basics: A guide for engineering educators
[27]  
Crebert G., 2013, ETHICAL BEHAV SOCIAL
[28]  
Eccles J.S., 2007, WHY ARENT MORE WOMEN, P199, DOI DOI 10.1037/11546-016
[29]  
Eisenhart M, 2015, J RES SCI TEACHING
[30]  
Eisenhart M., 1998, Women's science: Learning and succeeding from the margins