Cross-National Variation in the Size of Sex Differences in Values: Effects of Gender Equality

被引:210
作者
Schwartz, Shalom H. [1 ,2 ]
Rubel-Lifschitz, Tammy [1 ]
机构
[1] Hebrew Univ Jerusalem, Dept Psychol, IL-91905 Jerusalem, Israel
[2] Univ Bergen, Dept Psychol Sci, Bergen, Norway
关键词
values; sex differences; gender equality; national differences; RISK-TAKING; BEHAVIOR; VALIDITY; CULTURES; ORIGINS; WOMEN; MEN;
D O I
10.1037/a0015546
中图分类号
B84 [心理学];
学科分类号
04 ; 0402 ;
摘要
How does gender equality relate to men's and women's value priorities? It is hypothesized that, for both sexes, the importance of benevolence, universalism, stimulation, hedonism, and self-direction values increases with greater gender equality, whereas the importance of power, achievement, security, and tradition values decreases. Of particular relevance to the present study, increased gender equality should also permit both sexes to pursue more freely the values they inherently care about more. Drawing on evolutionary and role theories, the authors postulate that women inherently value benevolence and universalism more than men do, whereas men inherently value power, achievement, and stimulation more than women do. Thus, as gender equality increases, sex differences in these values should increase, whereas sex differences in other values should not be affected by increases in gender equality. Studies of 25 representative national samples and of students from 68 countries confirmed the hypotheses except for tradition values. Implications for cross-cultural research on sex differences in values and traits are discussed.
引用
收藏
页码:171 / 185
页数:15
相关论文
共 42 条
[1]  
[Anonymous], 2001, WELLBEING NATIONS CO
[2]  
Bandura A., 1977, SOCIAL LEARNING THEO
[3]   Is there a gender difference in strength of sex drive? Theoretical views, conceptual distinctions, and a review of relevant evidence [J].
Baumeister, RF ;
Catanese, KR ;
Vohs, KD .
PERSONALITY AND SOCIAL PSYCHOLOGY REVIEW, 2001, 5 (03) :242-273
[4]   SEXUAL STRATEGIES THEORY - AN EVOLUTIONARY PERSPECTIVE ON HUMAN MATING [J].
BUSS, DM ;
SCHMITT, DP .
PSYCHOLOGICAL REVIEW, 1993, 100 (02) :204-232
[5]   Gender differences in risk taking: A meta-analysis [J].
Byrnes, JP ;
Miller, DC ;
Schafer, WD .
PSYCHOLOGICAL BULLETIN, 1999, 125 (03) :367-383
[6]  
*CENTR COORD TEAM, 2002, EUR SOC SURV SELF CO
[7]  
Costa PT, 2001, J PERS SOC PSYCHOL, V81, P322, DOI [10.1037/0022-3514.81.2.322, 10.1037//0022-3514.81.2.322]
[8]  
Daly M, 2001, Nebr Symp Motiv, V47, P1
[9]   Bringing values back in - The adequacy of the European Social Survey to measure values in 20 countries [J].
Davidov, Eldad ;
Schmidt, Peter ;
Schwartz, Shalom H. .
PUBLIC OPINION QUARTERLY, 2008, 72 (03) :420-445
[10]  
Davies A.P. C., 2008, Foundations of evolutionary psychology: Ideas, issues and applications, V3rd, P261