Evacuation risk assessment of regional evacuation for major accidents and its application in emergency planning: A case study

被引:70
作者
Gai, Wen-mei [1 ]
Du, Yan [2 ]
Deng, Yun-feng [3 ]
机构
[1] China Univ Geosci, Sch Engn & Technol, Beijing 100083, Peoples R China
[2] Univ Sci & Technol Beijing, Sch Civil & Resources Engn, Beijing 100083, Peoples R China
[3] Chinese Acad Governance, Beijing 100089, Peoples R China
基金
中国国家自然科学基金;
关键词
Evacuation risk assessment; Regional evacuation; Emergency preparation; Emergency response; Major accidents; PROCESS INDUSTRY; MODEL; OPTIMIZATION; HAZARDS; VULNERABILITY; ALGORITHM; NETWORK; CHINA; NETHERLANDS; EARTHQUAKE;
D O I
10.1016/j.ssci.2018.03.021
中图分类号
T [工业技术];
学科分类号
08 ;
摘要
Major accidents, like toxic gas releases, fires and explosions, may influence a large area. And thus, evacuation is a necessary public protection measure to mitigate the health consequences of major accidents, but risk assessment is still required. This paper focuses on providing an assessment framework of evacuation risk for major accidents, and the exposure dose calculated based on vulnerability model and accident probability is introduced to predict the risk. Evacuation risk evaluation based on "ALARP" guidelines is employed to partition the emergency planning area and to give suggestions for emergency preparation, as well as to classify the alternatives of evacuation flow assignment and find the optimal solution to decide whether to evacuate or to take shelter-in-place for emergency response through using different heuristics. The goal of its application in emergency response planning is to provide a fast heuristic method to select evacuation paths, but neither to minimize the evacuation time nor minimize the evacuation risk. The primary intention is to find an optimal solution within optimized evacuation time and with acceptable evacuation risk. A case study on evacuation risk assessment for phosgene leak accident in Yantai, China is used as an example to illustrate evacuation risk assessment process and its application in emergency preparation and response.
引用
收藏
页码:203 / 218
页数:16
相关论文
共 66 条
[1]   Risk assessment practices in The Netherlands [J].
Ale, BJM .
SAFETY SCIENCE, 2002, 40 (1-4) :105-126
[2]   Thresholds for domino effects and safety distances in the process industry: A review of approaches and regulations [J].
Alileche, Nassim ;
Cozzani, Valerio ;
Reniers, Genserik ;
Estel, Lionel .
RELIABILITY ENGINEERING & SYSTEM SAFETY, 2015, 143 :74-84
[3]   A methodology for the quantitative risk assessment of major accidents triggered by seismic events [J].
Antonioni, Giacomo ;
Spadoni, Gighola ;
Cozzani, Valerio .
JOURNAL OF HAZARDOUS MATERIALS, 2007, 147 (1-2) :48-59
[4]   Risk analysis and safety policy developments in the Netherlands [J].
Bottelberghs, PH .
JOURNAL OF HAZARDOUS MATERIALS, 2000, 71 (1-3) :59-84
[5]   Time-dependent risk modeling of accidental events and responses in process industries [J].
Bris, Radim ;
Medonos, Sava ;
Wilkins, Chris ;
Zdrahala, Adam .
RELIABILITY ENGINEERING & SYSTEM SAFETY, 2014, 125 :54-66
[6]   Application of a quantitative risk assessment method to emergency response planning [J].
Brown, David F. ;
Dunn, William E. .
COMPUTERS & OPERATIONS RESEARCH, 2007, 34 (05) :1243-1265
[7]   A method for evacuation route planning in disaster situations [J].
Campos, Vania ;
Bandeira, Renata ;
Bandeira, Adriano .
PROCEEDINGS OF EWGT 2012 - 15TH MEETING OF THE EURO WORKING GROUP ON TRANSPORTATION, 2012, 54 :503-512
[8]   Transportation planning for disasters: an accessibility approach [J].
Chang, SE .
ENVIRONMENT AND PLANNING A-ECONOMY AND SPACE, 2003, 35 (06) :1051-1072
[9]   Turbulence in an inundated urban environment during a major flood: implications in terms of people evacuation and sediment deposition [J].
Chanson, H. ;
Brown, R. .
MECHANICS & INDUSTRY, 2014, 15 (02) :101-106
[10]   A model for evacuation risk assessment with consideration of pre- and post-disaster factors [J].
Chen, Xiang ;
Kwan, Mei-Po ;
Li, Qiang ;
Chen, Jin .
COMPUTERS ENVIRONMENT AND URBAN SYSTEMS, 2012, 36 (03) :207-217