KOH vs Deionized Water Operation in Anion Exchange Membrane Electrolyzers

被引:29
作者
Ul Hassan, Noor [1 ]
Zheng, Yiwei [1 ]
Kohl, Paul A. [2 ]
Mustain, William E. [1 ]
机构
[1] Univ South Carolina, Dept Chem Engn, Columbia, SC 29208 USA
[2] Georgia Inst Technol, Sch Chem & Biomol Engn, Atlanta, GA 30318 USA
关键词
LOW-COST; PERFORMANCE; HYDROGEN; POWER; GAS;
D O I
10.1149/1945-7111/ac5f1d
中图分类号
O646 [电化学、电解、磁化学];
学科分类号
081704 ;
摘要
Anion exchange membrane water electrolyzers (AEMELs) have recently received significant attention due to their potential advantages over proton exchange membrane electrolyzers (PEMELs). However, some AEMELs feed an aqueous salt solution to the cell where PEMELs typically feed deionized (DI) water. DI water is preferred to keep the system and maintenance costs low. Because of this, many AEMEL researchers report performance both in the salt solution (typically KOH) and DI water. However, the methodology for switching between KOH and DI water is often poorly defined, and it is unclear what impact the residual salt has on cell performance after switching from salt to DI water. Having a fully deionized environment is important because the presence of salts in the water feed increase the effective electrochemical surface area of the catalyst in the three-dimensional electrode and residual salt remaining after switching to DI water feed can have a misleading transient effect on cell performance. This paper focuses on understanding the transition from KOH to DI water testing in AEMELs. It is shown that when switching from salt to DI water feed, a large volume of DI water must be fed over several hours to achieve true DI-water performance. It is also shown that starting AEMELs from the beginning with DI water feed (without any KOH ever being fed to the cell) results in better cell durability. Lastly, a cell is demonstrated having operated exclusively on DI water at 1.0 A cm(-2) for 500 h at an operating voltage of ca. 2 V and a low degradation rate.
引用
收藏
页数:6
相关论文
共 45 条
[1]   A Roadmap to Low-Cost Hydrogen with Hydroxide Exchange Membrane Electrolyzers [J].
Abbasi, Reza ;
Setzler, Brion P. ;
Lin, Saisai ;
Wang, Junhuo ;
Zhao, Yun ;
Xu, Hui ;
Pivovar, Bryan ;
Tian, Boyuan ;
Chen, Xi ;
Wu, Gang ;
Yan, Yushan .
ADVANCED MATERIALS, 2019, 31 (31)
[2]  
Anderson E., 2016, 2 INT WORKSH DUR DEG
[3]  
[Anonymous], 2014, Horizon Europe the EU's funding programme for research and innovation
[4]   The spectrum of power from wind turbines [J].
Apt, Jay .
JOURNAL OF POWER SOURCES, 2007, 169 (02) :369-374
[5]   Characterization of Anion Exchange Membrane Technology for Low Cost Electrolysis [J].
Ayers, K. E. ;
Anderson, E. B. ;
Capuano, C. B. ;
Niedzweicki, M. ;
Hickner, M. ;
Wang, C-Y ;
Len, Y. ;
Zhou, W. .
FUEL CELL MEMBRANES, ELECTRODE BINDERS, AND MEA PERFORMANCE, 2013, 45 (23) :121-130
[6]   Research Advances Towards Low Cost, High Efficiency PEM Electrolysis [J].
Ayers, K. E. ;
Anderson, E. B. ;
Capuano, C. B. ;
Carter, B. D. ;
Dalton, L. T. ;
Hanlon, G. ;
Manco, J. ;
Niedzwiecki, M. .
POLYMER ELECTROLYTE FUEL CELLS 10, PTS 1 AND 2, 2010, 33 (01) :3-15
[7]  
Ayers K.E., 2012, ECS Trans, V41, P15, DOI [10.1149/1.3684798, DOI 10.1149/1.3684798]
[8]   Analysis of the effect of catalyst layer thickness on the performance and durability of platinum group metal-free catalysts for polymer electrolyte membrane fuel cells [J].
Baricci, Andrea ;
Bisello, Andrea ;
Serov, Alexey ;
Odgaard, Madeleine ;
Atanassov, Plamen ;
Casalegno, Andrea .
SUSTAINABLE ENERGY & FUELS, 2019, 3 (12) :3375-3386
[9]   H2 generation from alkaline electrolyzer [J].
Bodner, Merit ;
Hofer, Astrid ;
Hacker, Viktor .
WILEY INTERDISCIPLINARY REVIEWS-ENERGY AND ENVIRONMENT, 2015, 4 (04) :365-381
[10]   Envisioning a low-cost solar future: Exploring the potential impact of Achieving the SunShot 2030 targets for photovoltaics [J].
Cole, Wesley ;
Frew, Bethany ;
Gagnon, Pieter ;
Reimers, Andrew ;
Zuboy, Jarett ;
Margolis, Robert .
ENERGY, 2018, 155 :690-704