Towards a Pluralist Theory of Truthmaking

被引:12
作者
Griffith, Aaron M. [1 ]
机构
[1] Cent Michigan Univ, Dept Philosophy & Relig, Mt Pleasant, MI 48859 USA
关键词
NEGATIVE TRUTHS; ABSENCES; REALISM;
D O I
10.1007/s10670-014-9717-7
中图分类号
B [哲学、宗教];
学科分类号
01 ; 0101 ;
摘要
This paper introduces a new approach to the theory of truthmaking. According to this approach, there are multiple forms of truthmaking. Here, I characterize and motivate a specific version of this approach, which I call a 'Pluralist Theory of Truthmaking.' It is suggested that truthmaking is a plural, variegated phenomenon wherein different kinds of truths, e.g., positive truths, negative truths, counterfactual truths, etc., are made true in different ways. While the paper only aims to lay the groundwork for a Pluralist Theory of Truthmaking, I show how the theory can be applied to positive and negative truths. The upshot of this application is that truthmaking pluralism allows us to provide negative truths with 'non-suspicious' truthmakers. Finally, it is argued that Truthmaker Maximalists would do well to endorse truthmaking pluralism, as it offers a new strategy for upholding Maximalism while diminishing controversial ontological commitments.
引用
收藏
页码:1157 / 1173
页数:17
相关论文
共 65 条
[1]  
Alston William., 1996, A Realist Conception of Truth
[2]  
[Anonymous], 2007, TRUTH AND ONTOLOGY
[3]  
[Anonymous], 1997, WORLD STATES AFFAIRS, DOI DOI 10.1017/CBO9780511583308
[4]  
[Anonymous], 2013, TRUTH PLURALISM CURR
[5]  
[Anonymous], 2001, NATURE TRUTH CLASSIC
[6]  
Armstrong D. M., 2004, TRUTH TRUTHMAKERS
[7]   A TRUTHMAKING ACCOUNT OF REALISM AND ANTI-REALISM [J].
Asay, Jamin .
PACIFIC PHILOSOPHICAL QUARTERLY, 2012, 93 (03) :373-394
[8]   Being Positive About Negative Facts [J].
Barker, Stephen ;
Jago, Mark .
PHILOSOPHY AND PHENOMENOLOGICAL RESEARCH, 2012, 85 (01) :117-138
[9]  
Barnard R., 2013, Truth and Pluralism: Current Debates, P180, DOI [10.1093/acprof:oso/9780195387469.003.0009, DOI 10.1093/ACPROF:OSO/9780195387469.003.0009]
[10]  
Beall J., 2013, Truth and pluralism: Current debates, P323, DOI [10.1093/acprof:oso/9780195387469.003.0016, DOI 10.1093/ACPROF:OSO/9780195387469.003.0016]