2019 WACEM - Academic College of Emergency Experts Consensus Recommendations on Admission Criteria to Pediatric Intensive Care Unit from the Emergency Departments in India

被引:2
作者
Fassl, Lalitha A. V. Bernhard [1 ]
Gist, Ramon E. [2 ,3 ]
Shah, Binita R. [3 ]
Chawla, Nitin [4 ]
Singh, Ajay [5 ]
Baranawal, Arun [6 ]
Shamarao, Shivakumar [7 ]
Vanaki, Raghavendra [8 ]
Mahajan, Prashant [9 ]
Patel, Reena [2 ]
Chauhan, Vivek [10 ]
Batra, Prerna [11 ]
Saha, Abhijeet [12 ]
Galwankar, Sagar [13 ]
Soans, Santosh [14 ]
机构
[1] St Johns Med Coll & Hosp, Dept Pediat, Bengaluru, Karnataka, India
[2] Univ Utah, Dept Pediat, Salt Lake City, UT USA
[3] Suny Downstate Med Ctr, Dept Pediat, Brooklyn, NY 11203 USA
[4] Kamineni Super Special Hosp, Pediat Emergency, Hyderabad, Telangana, India
[5] King Georges Med Univ, Dept Orthoped, Lucknow, Uttar Pradesh, India
[6] PGIMER, Dept Pediat, Chandigarh, India
[7] Manipal Hosp, Pediat Intens Care Unit, Bengaluru, India
[8] SN Med Coll & Hosp, Dept Pediat, Bagalkot, Karnataka, India
[9] Univ Michigan, Dept Emergency Med, Ann Arbor, MI 48109 USA
[10] Kangra Univ & Med Ctr, Dharmshala, Himachal Prades, India
[11] Univ Coll Med Sci & Guru Tegh Bahadur Hosp, Dept Pediat, Delhi, India
[12] Lady Hardinge Med Coll & Associated Kalawati Sara, Dept Pediat, New Delhi, India
[13] Florida State Univ, Sarasota Mem Hosp, Dept Emergency Med, Tallahassee, FL 32306 USA
[14] AJ Inst Med Sci, Dept Pediat, Mangalore, Karnataka, India
关键词
Admission criteria; consensus recommendations; pediatric intensive care; pediatric intensive care unit; THERAPEUTIC EFFICACY; ACUITY SCALE; TRIAGE; GUIDELINES; DISCHARGE; MULTICENTER; VALIDITY;
D O I
10.4103/JETS.JETS_140_18
中图分类号
R4 [临床医学];
学科分类号
1002 ; 100602 ;
摘要
There is a global variation in policies that define clear indications for pediatric intensive care unit (PICU) admissions. In resource-limited countries where PICU service availability is limited, the admission criteria to PICU are urgently needed to optimize the utilization of available intensive care services and to maximize patient benefit. The objective of these consensus recommendations on PICU admission criteria is to provide a framework and reference for future policy development by professional societies and governments. Design: The consensus recommendations were developed by a multidisciplinary consensus task force comprised of international experts in pediatric critical care, emergency medicine, trauma, critical care, and health policy stakeholders during the 2016 annual INDUSEM WORLD CONGRESS in Bengaluru, India. Measurements and Main Results: A task force steering committee completed a global literature search about PICU admission criteria development, reviewed PICU admission guidelines published by a variety of professional organizations worldwide, and performed a literature review of relevant publications. The objectives of this task force is to provide a framework for validated approach to determine appropriateness of intensive care unit (ICU) admission in India (resource-limited setting) based on (a) prioritization modeling; (b) general clinical criteria; (c) clinical and objective parameters; and (d) other criteria. The expert consensus panel then discussed and ranked proposed criteria according to scientific evidence, the current standard of care, and expert opinion in the context of the Indian health system. The general subject was addressed in sections: admission criteria and benefits of different levels of care. Following the appraisal of the literature, discussion, and consensus, recommendations were written. Conclusion: Although these are consensus recommendations, the subjects addressed encompass complex ethical and medicolegal aspects of patient care that affect daily clinical practice. The scarcity of high-quality evidence made it difficult to answer all the questions asked related to ICU admission. Despite these limitations, the members of the task force believe that these recommendations provide a comprehensive framework to guide practitioners in making informed decisions during the admission process. This publication is designed to assist in future development of health policies to ensure effective resource allocation, maximize healthcare benefits, and improve access to quality care for children.
引用
收藏
页码:155 / 162
页数:8
相关论文
共 28 条
  • [1] [Anonymous], 1999, Pediatrics, V103, P840
  • [2] [Anonymous], 1983, JAMA-J AM MED ASSOC, V2506, P798
  • [3] [Anonymous], 2010, CLIN PRACT REC ADM P
  • [4] ANALYSIS OF INDICATIONS FOR INTENSIVE-CARE UNIT ADMISSION - CLINICAL EFFICACY ASSESSMENT PROJECT - AMERICAN-COLLEGE OF PHYSICIANS
    BONE, RC
    MCELWEE, NE
    EUBANKS, DH
    GLUCK, EH
    [J]. CHEST, 1993, 104 (06) : 1806 - 1811
  • [5] THE THERAPEUTIC EFFICACY OF CRITICAL CARE UNITS FROM 2 PERSPECTIVES - A TRADITIONAL COHORT APPROACH VS A NEW CASE CONTROL METHODOLOGY
    CHARLSON, ME
    SAX, FL
    [J]. JOURNAL OF CHRONIC DISEASES, 1987, 40 (01): : 31 - 39
  • [6] Egol A, 1999, CRIT CARE MED, V27, P633
  • [7] The Singapore Paediatric Triage Scale Validation Study
    Ganapathy, Sashikumar
    Yeo, Joo Guan
    Thia, Xing Hui Michelle
    Hei, Geok Mei Andrea
    Tham, Lai Peng
    [J]. SINGAPORE MEDICAL JOURNAL, 2018, 59 (04) : 205 - 209
  • [8] Govil YC, 2006, INDIAN PEDIATR, V43, P675
  • [9] Performance of the Canadian Triage and Acuity Scale for Children: A Multicenter Database Study
    Gravel, Jocelyn
    Fitzpatrick, Eleanor
    Gouin, Serge
    Millar, Kelly
    Curtis, Sarah
    Joubert, Gary
    Boutis, Kathy
    Guimont, Chantal
    Goldman, Ran D.
    Dubrovsky, Alexander S.
    Porter, Robert
    Beer, Darcy
    Quynh Doan
    Osmond, Martin H.
    [J]. ANNALS OF EMERGENCY MEDICINE, 2013, 61 (01) : 27 - 32
  • [10] Gravel J, 2009, CAN J EMERG MED, V11, P23