Quality and Readability of Online Patient Education Materials Related to Branchial Cleft Cysts

被引:5
作者
Daines, Benjamin S. [1 ]
Idicula, Winslo [1 ]
机构
[1] Texas Tech Univ, Hlth Sci Ctr, Otolaryngol, Lubbock, TX 79430 USA
关键词
quality of health information; readability; branchial cyst; branchial cleft cyst; patient education material; CONSUMER HEALTH INFORMATION; LITERACY; INTERNET;
D O I
10.7759/cureus.24287
中图分类号
R5 [内科学];
学科分类号
1002 ; 100201 ;
摘要
Introduction Branchial cleft cysts are the second most common congenital neck mass and can cause significant anxiety for patients and families despite their benign nature. Education through online patient education materials (PEMs) is critical for informing patients and reducing stress. We aimed to determine the content, quality, and readability of online PEMs related to branchial cleft cysts. Methods The search engine Google was used to collect the first 100 website results for the query "branchial cleft cyst." PEMs were included and assessed for content, quality via the DISCERN tool, and readability via Flesch Reading Ease Score (FRES), Flesch-Kincaid Reading Grade Level (FKGL), Gunning Frequency of Gobbledygook (GFOG), and Simple Measure of Gobbledygook (SMOG). Results Twenty-six websites containing PEMs related to branchial cleft cysts were assessed. Most websites were from universities or medical centers and did not contain any media. The mean DISCERN score was 49.3 (SD: 11.1, Median: 52.5), the mean FRES score was 51.9 (SD: 12.1, Median: 54.0), the mean FKGL score was 10.35 (SD: 2.52, Median: 9.95), the mean GFOG score was 13.32 (SD: 2.52, Median: 13.00), and the mean SMOG score was 10.25 (SD: 1.83, Median: 9.95). DISCERN was not significantly correlated with FRES, FKGL, GFOG, or SMOG. Conclusion Online PEMs related to branchial cleft cysts are consistently written above the National Institutes of Health (NIH) recommended sixth-grade reading level and are often of unsatisfactory overall quality. Writers of online PEMs for branchial cleft cysts should consider the readability and quality of their materials to improve patient education and reduce anxiety.
引用
收藏
页数:6
相关论文
共 27 条
[1]  
Allen SB., 2022, BRANCHIAL CLEFT CYST
[2]  
[Anonymous], 2021, Mobile fact sheet
[3]  
[Anonymous], 2021, CLEAR COMMUNICATION
[4]  
[Anonymous], 2022, SEARCH ENGINE MARKET
[5]  
[Anonymous], 2022, READABILITY TEST TOO
[6]   Low Health Literacy and Health Outcomes: An Updated Systematic Review [J].
Berkman, Nancy D. ;
Sheridan, Stacey L. ;
Donahue, Katrina E. ;
Halpern, David J. ;
Crotty, Karen .
ANNALS OF INTERNAL MEDICINE, 2011, 155 (02) :97-+
[7]   The Impact of Online Health Information on Patient Health Behaviours and Making Decisions Concerning Health [J].
Bujnowska-Fedak, Maria Magdalena ;
Wegierek, Paulina .
INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF ENVIRONMENTAL RESEARCH AND PUBLIC HEALTH, 2020, 17 (03)
[8]   DISCERN: an instrument for judging the quality of written consumer health information on treatment choices [J].
Charnock, D ;
Shepperd, S ;
Needham, G ;
Gann, R .
JOURNAL OF EPIDEMIOLOGY AND COMMUNITY HEALTH, 1999, 53 (02) :105-111
[9]   Quality and readability of websites for patient information on tonsillectomy and sleep apnea [J].
Chi, Ethan ;
Jabbour, Noel ;
Aaronson, Nicole Leigh .
INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF PEDIATRIC OTORHINOLARYNGOLOGY, 2017, 98 :1-3
[10]   Consumer health information seeking on the Internet: the state of the art [J].
Cline, RJW ;
Haynes, KM .
HEALTH EDUCATION RESEARCH, 2001, 16 (06) :671-692