Do the Socially Rich Get Richer? A Nuanced Perspective on Social Network Site Use and Online Social Capital Accrual

被引:114
作者
Cheng, Cecilia [1 ]
Wang, Hsin-yi [1 ]
Sigerson, Leif [1 ]
Chau, Chor-lam [1 ]
机构
[1] Univ Hong Kong, Dept Psychol, Pokfulam Rd, Hong Kong, Peoples R China
关键词
Facebook; online social media; social capital; social network site; social networking site; COMPUTER-MEDIATED COMMUNICATION; 5; PERSONALITY-FACTORS; COLLEGE-STUDENTS USE; QUALITY-OF-LIFE; FACEBOOK USE; SELF-ESTEEM; INTERNATIONAL STUDENTS; INDIVIDUAL-DIFFERENCES; EMOTIONAL LONELINESS; ATTACHMENT STYLE;
D O I
10.1037/bul0000198
中图分类号
B84 [心理学];
学科分类号
04 ; 0402 ;
摘要
The benefits of using social network sites (SNS) have spurred heated debate in academia and popular culture alike. This study sought to address the debate by formulating a new, nuanced framework highlighting two conceptual distinctions: (a) preference for versus problem in one's interpersonal relations, and (b) SNS use versus the benefits of such use. Mixed-effects meta-analysis was performed in 178 independent samples from seven regions worldwide (n = 108,068; age range = 13-68). Eligible studies were those that examined an association between at least one common proxy measure of the socially rich (vs. poor; i.e., extraversion. social anxiety, or loneliness) and a criterion measure (i.e., SNS use or online social capital). The results revealed a complex picture. SNS use was positively correlated with both extraversion and social anxiety, although the social anxiety-SNS use correlation was significant for adult samples rather than adolescent samples. Online social capital was positively correlated with extraversion but inversely correlated with loneliness. Our conclusion is that extraverted individuals use SNS to enhance their opportunities for social interactions and can acquire more online social resources, whereas adults who are socially anxious use SNS to compensate for their social deficits but such effort is unrelated to online social resource accumulation. Individuals who feel lonely tend to obtain few such resources. However, most of the studies examined the leisure use of Facebook. We advocate more thorough testing of our hypotheses in future research on therapeutic SNS use and/or the use of SNS other than Facebook.
引用
收藏
页码:734 / 764
页数:31
相关论文
共 406 条
[21]  
[Anonymous], 2004, METHODS META ANAL CO, DOI DOI 10.4135/9781412985031
[22]  
[Anonymous], 2017, COMPUT HUM BEHAV, DOI DOI 10.1016/j.chb.2017.05.041
[23]  
[Anonymous], CHINESE J SCH DOCTOR
[24]  
[Anonymous], THESIS
[25]  
[Anonymous], CONTENT ANAL INTRO I
[26]  
[Anonymous], AM ASS BEHAV SOCIAL
[27]  
[Anonymous], 2017, MEDIA PSYCHOL, DOI DOI 10.1080/15213269.2015.1121832
[28]  
[Anonymous], 2000, KNOWLEDGE SOCIAL CAP
[29]  
[Anonymous], COMPR MET VERS 2 2 0
[30]  
[Anonymous], 2019, Most Popular Social Networks Worldwide as of October 2019, ranked by numbers of active users in millions