Selection of Effective Stone Tools by Wild Bearded Capuchin Monkeys

被引:166
作者
Visalberghi, Elisabetta [1 ,2 ]
Addessi, Elsa [1 ,2 ]
Truppa, Valentina [1 ,2 ,3 ]
Spagnoletti, Noemi [1 ,2 ,4 ]
Ottoni, Eduardo [5 ]
Izar, Patricia [5 ]
Fragaszy, Dorothy [6 ]
机构
[1] CNRS, Unit Cognit Primatol, I-00197 Rome, Italy
[2] CNRS, Inst Cognit Sci & Technol, Ctr Primate, I-00197 Rome, Italy
[3] Univ Padua, Dept Gen Psychol, I-35131 Padua, Italy
[4] Univ Roma La Sapienza, Dept Anim & Human Biol, I-00185 Rome, Italy
[5] Univ Sao Paulo, Dept Expt Psychol, BR-05508030 Sao Paulo, Brazil
[6] Univ Georgia, Dept Psychol, Athens, GA 30602 USA
关键词
CEBUS-LIBIDINOSUS; USE WEIGHT; COGNITION; APELLA; ANVILS;
D O I
10.1016/j.cub.2008.11.064
中图分类号
Q5 [生物化学]; Q7 [分子生物学];
学科分类号
071010 ; 081704 ;
摘要
Appreciation of objects' affordances and planning is a hallmark of human technology. Archeological evidence suggests that Pliocene hominins selected raw material for tool making [1, 2]. Stone pounding has been considered a precursor to tool making [3, 4], and tool use by living primates provides insight into the origins of material selection by human ancestors. No study has experimentally investigated selectivity of stone tools in wild animals, although chimpanzees appear to select stones according to properties of different nut species [5, 6]. We recently discovered that wild capuchins with terrestrial habits [7] use hammers to crack open nuts on anvils [8-10]. As for chimpanzees, examination of anvil sites suggests stone selectivity [11], but indirect evidence cannot prove it. Here, we demonstrate that capuchins, which last shared a common ancestor with humans 35 million years ago, faced with stones differing in functional features (friability and weight) choose, transport, and use the effective stone to crack nuts. Moreover, when weight cannot be judged by visual attributes, capuchins act to gain information to guide their selection. Thus, planning actions and intentional selection of tools is within the ken of monkeys and similar to the tool activities of hominins and apes.
引用
收藏
页码:213 / 217
页数:5
相关论文
共 25 条
[1]  
[Anonymous], 2004, COMPLETE CAPUCHIN BI, DOI DOI 10.5860/CHOICE.42-4029
[2]  
Biro D, 2011, COGNITIVE DEVELOPMENT IN CHIMPANZEES, P476
[3]   OPTIMIZATION OF NUT-CRACKING WITH NATURAL HAMMERS BY WILD CHIMPANZEES [J].
BOESCH, C ;
BOESCH, H .
BEHAVIOUR, 1983, 83 :265-286
[4]   What makes us human (Homo sapiens)?: The challenge of cognitive cross-species comparison [J].
Boesch, Christophe .
JOURNAL OF COMPARATIVE PSYCHOLOGY, 2007, 121 (03) :227-240
[5]  
Boesch Christophe, 2000, The chimpanzees of Tai Forest: Behavioural ecology and evolution
[6]   Stone tools and the uniqueness of human culture [J].
Davidson, I ;
McGrew, WC .
JOURNAL OF THE ROYAL ANTHROPOLOGICAL INSTITUTE, 2005, 11 (04) :793-817
[7]   The invention of technology - Prehistory and cognition [J].
de Beaune, SA .
CURRENT ANTHROPOLOGY, 2004, 45 (02) :139-162
[8]   Wild capuchin monkeys (Cebus libidinosus) use anvils and stone pounding tools [J].
Fragaszy, D ;
Izar, P ;
Visalberghi, E ;
Ottoni, EB ;
De Oliveira, MG .
AMERICAN JOURNAL OF PRIMATOLOGY, 2004, 64 (04) :359-366
[9]   Acquisition of foraging competence in wild brown capuchins (Cebus apella), with special reference to conspecifics' foraging artefacts as an indirect social influence [J].
Gunst, Noelle ;
Boinski, Sue ;
Fragaszy, Dorothy M. .
BEHAVIOUR, 2008, 145 :195-229
[10]   Issues in the Comparative Cognition of Abstract-Concept Learning [J].
Katz, Jeffrey S. ;
Wright, Anthony A. ;
Bodily, Kent D. .
COMPARATIVE COGNITION & BEHAVIOR REVIEWS, 2007, 2 :79-92