What the Neuroscience and Psychology of Magic Reveal about Misinformation

被引:0
|
作者
Alexander, Robert G. [1 ,2 ,3 ]
Macknik, Stephen L. [1 ,2 ,3 ]
Martinez-Conde, Susana [1 ,2 ,3 ]
机构
[1] State Univ New York Downstate Hlth Sci Univ, Dept Ophthalmol, Brooklyn, NY 11203 USA
[2] State Univ New York state Hlth Sci Univ, Dept Neurol, Brooklyn, NY 11203 USA
[3] State Univ New York state Hlth Sci Univ, Dept Physiol & Pharmacol, Brooklyn, NY 11203 USA
基金
美国国家科学基金会;
关键词
misinformation; magic; disinformation; science communication; fake news; science reporting; attentional misdirection; deception; inattentional blindness; critical thinking; RANDOMIZED CONTROLLED-TRIALS; ARTIFICIAL-INTELLIGENCE; CHANGE BLINDNESS; PRESS RELEASES; CLIMATE-CHANGE; ATTENTION; SCIENCE; MISDIRECTION; MECHANISMS; JUDGMENTS;
D O I
10.3390/publications10040033
中图分类号
G25 [图书馆学、图书馆事业]; G35 [情报学、情报工作];
学科分类号
1205 ; 120501 ;
摘要
When we believe misinformation, we have succumbed to an illusion: our perception or interpretation of the world does not match reality. We often trust misinformation for reasons that are unrelated to an objective, critical interpretation of the available data: Key facts go unnoticed or unreported. Overwhelming information prevents the formulation of alternative explanations. Statements become more believable every time they are repeated. Events are reframed or given "spin" to mislead audiences. In magic shows, illusionists apply similar techniques to convince spectators that false and even seemingly impossible events have happened. Yet, many magicians are "honest liars", asking audiences to suspend their disbelief only during the performance, for the sole purpose of entertainment. Magic misdirection has been studied in the lab for over a century. Psychological research has sought to understand magic from a scientific perspective and to apply the tools of magic to the understanding of cognitive and perceptual processes. More recently, neuroscientific investigations have also explored the relationship between magic illusions and their underlying brain mechanisms. We propose that the insights gained from such studies can be applied to understanding the prevalence and success of misinformation. Here, we review some of the common factors in how people experience magic during a performance and are subject to misinformation in their daily lives. Considering these factors will be important in reducing misinformation and encouraging critical thinking in society.
引用
收藏
页数:19
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [41] It's About Time: Atending to Temporality in Misinformation Interventions
    Wilner, Tamar
    Mimizuka, Kayo
    Bhimdiwala, Ayesha
    Young, Jason C.
    Arif, Ahmer
    PROCEEDINGS OF THE 2023 CHI CONFERENCE ON HUMAN FACTORS IN COMPUTING SYSTEMS, CHI 2023, 2023,
  • [42] What message features influence the intention to share misinformation about COVID-19 on social media? The role of efficacy and novelty
    Song, Hayeon
    So, Jiyeon
    Shim, Minsun
    Kim, Jieun
    Kim, Eunji
    Lee, Kyungha
    COMPUTERS IN HUMAN BEHAVIOR, 2023, 138
  • [43] Active versus passive: evaluating the effectiveness of inoculation techniques in relation to misinformation about climate change
    Green, Madison
    McShane, Connar Jo
    Swinbourne, Anne
    AUSTRALIAN JOURNAL OF PSYCHOLOGY, 2022, 74 (01)
  • [45] Misinformed About The "Infodemic?" Science's Ongoing Struggle With Misinformation
    Scheufele, Dietram A.
    Krause, Nicole M.
    Freiling, Isabelle
    JOURNAL OF APPLIED RESEARCH IN MEMORY AND COGNITION, 2021, 10 (04) : 522 - 526
  • [46] What boxing-related stimuli reveal about response behaviour
    Ottoboni, Giovanni
    Russo, Gabriele
    Tessari, Alessia
    JOURNAL OF SPORTS SCIENCES, 2015, 33 (10) : 1019 - 1027
  • [47] Twitter Misinformation Discourses About Vaping: Systematic Content Analysis
    Al-Rawi, Ahmed
    Blackwell, Breanna
    Zemenchik, Kiana
    Lee, Kelley
    JOURNAL OF MEDICAL INTERNET RESEARCH, 2023, 25
  • [48] The Psychology and Neuroscience of Financial Decision Making
    Frydman, Cary
    Camerer, Colin F.
    TRENDS IN COGNITIVE SCIENCES, 2016, 20 (09) : 661 - 675
  • [49] A Neuroscience Agenda for Counseling Psychology Research
    Goncalves, Oscar F.
    Perrone-McGovern, Kristin M.
    JOURNAL OF COUNSELING PSYCHOLOGY, 2014, 61 (04) : 507 - 512
  • [50] The distorting effects of producer strategies: Why engagement does not reveal consumer preferences for misinformation
    Stewart, Alexander J.
    Arechar, Antonio A.
    Rand, David G.
    Plotkin, Joshua B.
    PROCEEDINGS OF THE NATIONAL ACADEMY OF SCIENCES OF THE UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, 2024, 121 (10)