Assessing landscape preferences: a visual choice experiment in the agricultural region of Markische Schweiz, Germany

被引:78
作者
Haefner, Kati [1 ]
Zasada, Ingo [1 ]
van Zanten, Boris T. [2 ]
Ungaro, Fabrizio [1 ,3 ]
Koetse, Mark [2 ]
Piorr, Annette [1 ]
机构
[1] Leibniz Ctr Agr Landscape Res ZALF, Inst Socioecon, Muncheberg, Germany
[2] Vrije Univ Amsterdam, Inst Environm Studies, Amsterdam, Netherlands
[3] CNR, Inst Biometeorol, Sesto Fiorentino, Italy
关键词
Cultural ecosystem services; visual quality; stated preference; discrete choice modelling; aesthetic value; CULTURAL ECOSYSTEM SERVICES; RURAL LANDSCAPES; INDICATORS; FRAMEWORK; QUALITY; MARKET;
D O I
10.1080/01426397.2017.1386289
中图分类号
X [环境科学、安全科学];
学科分类号
08 ; 0830 ;
摘要
Natural amenities and the aesthetic value of agricultural landscapes are important territorial assets for improving rural tourism and the quality of the living environment. To identify which characteristics shape the visual quality of a landscape, a stated-preference survey was conducted (N=200) using photorealistic landscape visualisations of four different landscape attributes (point green elements, linear green elements, crop diversity and presence of livestock). We estimated respondents' preferences for landscape attributes, examined the extent of agreement among respondents and identified socio-economic factors influencing their responses. Results revealed that point elements had the highest general preference. About 70% of respondents preferred diverse and highly structured landscapes, while about 30% of respondents had opposing preferences. Preferences were also found to be dependent on the individual's sociocultural background, such as their level of education, gender or age. These results can help to improve the multi-objective targeting of policies by including an aesthetic value perspective.
引用
收藏
页码:846 / 861
页数:16
相关论文
共 48 条
[11]   Where are Cultural and Social in Ecosystem Services? A Framework for Constructive Engagement [J].
Chan, Kai M. A. ;
Guerry, Anne D. ;
Balvanera, Patricia ;
Klain, Sarah ;
Satterfield, Terre ;
Basurto, Xavier ;
Bostrom, Ann ;
Chuenpagdee, Ratana ;
Gould, Rachelle ;
Halpern, Benjamin S. ;
Hannahs, Neil ;
Levine, Jordan ;
Norton, Bryan ;
Ruckelshaus, Mary ;
Russell, Roly ;
Tam, Jordan ;
Woodside, Ulalia .
BIOSCIENCE, 2012, 62 (08) :744-756
[12]   Choice experiment, multiple programmes contingent valuation and landscape preferences: How can we support the land use decision making process? [J].
Dachary-Bernard, Jeanne ;
Rambonilaza, Tina .
LAND USE POLICY, 2012, 29 (04) :846-854
[13]   Relationship between landscape visual attributes and spatial pattern indices: A test study in Mediterranean-climate landscapes [J].
de la Fuente de Val, Gonzalo ;
Atauri, Jose A. ;
de Lucio, Jose V. .
LANDSCAPE AND URBAN PLANNING, 2006, 77 (04) :393-407
[14]   Relationships between visual landscape preferences and map-based indicators of landscape structure [J].
Dramstad, W. E. ;
Tveit, M. Sundh ;
Fjellstad, W. J. ;
Fry, G. L. A. .
LANDSCAPE AND URBAN PLANNING, 2006, 78 (04) :465-474
[15]   Woodlots in the rural landscape: landowner motivations and management attitudes in a Michigan (USA) case study [J].
Erickson, DL ;
Ryan, RL ;
De Young, R .
LANDSCAPE AND URBAN PLANNING, 2002, 58 (2-4) :101-112
[16]   Heterogeneous preferences for agricultural landscape improvements in southern Finland [J].
Grammatikopoulou, Ioanna ;
Pouta, Eija ;
Salmiovirta, Maija ;
Soini, Katriina .
LANDSCAPE AND URBAN PLANNING, 2012, 107 (02) :181-191
[17]   Landscape aesthetics: Assessing the general publics' preferences towards rural landscapes [J].
Howley, Peter .
ECOLOGICAL ECONOMICS, 2011, 72 :161-169
[18]   A PROBABILISTIC CHOICE MODEL FOR MARKET-SEGMENTATION AND ELASTICITY STRUCTURE [J].
KAMAKURA, WA ;
RUSSELL, GJ .
JOURNAL OF MARKETING RESEARCH, 1989, 26 (04) :379-390
[19]  
Kaplan R., 1995, EXPERIENCE NATURE PS
[20]  
Kleinhuckelkotten S., 2011, NATURE AWARENESS STU