Knowledge and Presuppositions

被引:42
作者
Blome-Tillmann, Michael [1 ]
机构
[1] Univ Coll, Oxford OX1 4BH, England
关键词
CONTEXTUALISM; SKEPTICISM;
D O I
10.1093/mind/fzp032
中图分类号
B [哲学、宗教];
学科分类号
01 ; 0101 ;
摘要
The paper explicates a new way to model the context-sensitivity of 'knows', namely a way that suggests a close connection between the content of 'knows' in a context C and what is pragmatically presupposed in C. After explicating my new approach in the first half of the paper and arguing that it is explanatorily superior to standard accounts of epistemic contextualism, the paper points, in its second half, to some interesting new features of the emerging account, such as its compatibility with the intuitions of Moorean dogmatists. Finally, the paper shows that the account defended is not subject to the most prominent and familiar philosophical objections to epistemic contextualism discussed in the recent literature.
引用
收藏
页码:241 / 294
页数:54
相关论文
共 65 条
[11]   Unsafe knowledge [J].
Comesaña, J .
SYNTHESE, 2005, 146 (03) :395-404
[12]   CONTEXTUALISM AND KNOWLEDGE ATTRIBUTIONS [J].
DEROSE, K .
PHILOSOPHY AND PHENOMENOLOGICAL RESEARCH, 1992, 52 (04) :913-929
[13]   SOLVING THE SKEPTICAL PROBLEM [J].
DEROSE, K .
PHILOSOPHICAL REVIEW, 1995, 104 (01) :1-52
[14]   Single scoreboard semantics [J].
DeRose, K .
PHILOSOPHICAL STUDIES, 2004, 119 (1-2) :1-21
[15]   Bamboozled by our own words: Semantic blindness and some arguments against contextualism [J].
Derose, Keith .
PHILOSOPHY AND PHENOMENOLOGICAL RESEARCH, 2006, 73 (02) :316-338
[16]  
DeRose KeithTed A. Warfield., 1999, SKEPTICISM CONT READ
[17]  
FELDMAN R, 1999, PHILOS PERSPECT, V13, P91
[18]  
Fogelin RobertJ., 2000, Skepticism, V10, P43
[19]   What is a context of utterance? (Evaluation, relevance) [J].
Gauker, C .
PHILOSOPHICAL STUDIES, 1998, 91 (02) :149-172
[20]  
Goldberg S., 2007, INTERNALISM EXTERNAL