PLANNING GRAPH HEURISTICS FOR SOLVING CONTINGENT PLANNING PROBLEMS

被引:0
|
作者
Kim, Incheol [1 ]
Kim, Hyunsik [1 ]
机构
[1] Kyonggi Univ, Dept Comp Sci, Suwon, South Korea
来源
ICAART: PROCEEDINGS OF THE 4TH INTERNATIONAL CONFERENCE ON AGENTS AND ARTIFICIAL INTELLIGENCE, VOL 1 | 2012年
关键词
Contingent Planning; Belief State Space; Search Heuristic; Planning Graph;
D O I
10.5220/0003830505150519
中图分类号
TP18 [人工智能理论];
学科分类号
081104 ; 0812 ; 0835 ; 1405 ;
摘要
In order to extract domain-independent heuristics from the specification of a planning problem; it is necessary to relax the given problem and then solve the relaxed one. In this paper; we present a new planning graph; Merged Planning Graph(MPG), and GD heuristics for solving contingent planning problems including both uncertainty about the initial state and non-deterministic action effects. MPG is a new version of the relaxed planning graph for solving the contingent planning problems, In addition to the traditional delete relaxations of deterministic actions, MPG makes the effect-merge relaxations of both sensing and non-deterministic actions. Parallel to the forward expansion of MPG, the computation of GD heuristics proceeds with analysis of interactions among goals and/or subgoals. OD heuristics estimate the minimal reachability cost to achieve the given goal set by excluding redundant action costs. Through experiments in several problem domains, we show that GD heuristics are more informative than the traditional max and additive heuristics. Moreover, in comparison to the overlap heuristics, GD heuristics require much less computational effort for extraction.
引用
收藏
页码:515 / 519
页数:5
相关论文
共 40 条
  • [1] Domain independent heuristics for online stochastic contingent planning
    Blumenthal, Oded
    Shani, Guy
    ANNALS OF MATHEMATICS AND ARTIFICIAL INTELLIGENCE, 2024,
  • [2] Planning graph as the basis for deriving heuristics for plan synthesis by state space and CSP search
    Nguyen, XL
    Kambhampati, S
    Nigenda, RS
    ARTIFICIAL INTELLIGENCE, 2002, 135 (1-2) : 73 - 123
  • [3] CONTINGENT PLANNING AS BELIEF SPACE SEARCH
    Kim, Incheol
    Kim, Hyunsik
    ICAART 2011: PROCEEDINGS OF THE 3RD INTERNATIONAL CONFERENCE ON AGENTS AND ARTIFICIAL INTELLIGENCE, VOL 1, 2011, : 694 - 697
  • [4] Comparative Criteria for Partially Observable Contingent Planning
    Shmaryahu, Dorin
    Hoffmann, Joerg
    Shani, Guy
    AAMAS '19: PROCEEDINGS OF THE 18TH INTERNATIONAL CONFERENCE ON AUTONOMOUS AGENTS AND MULTIAGENT SYSTEMS, 2019, : 1740 - 1742
  • [5] Comparative criteria for partially observable contingent planning
    Dorin Shmaryahu
    Guy Shani
    Jörg Hoffmann
    Autonomous Agents and Multi-Agent Systems, 2019, 33 : 481 - 517
  • [6] Comparative criteria for partially observable contingent planning
    Shmaryahu, Door
    Shani, Guy
    Hoffmann, Joerg
    AUTONOMOUS AGENTS AND MULTI-AGENT SYSTEMS, 2019, 33 (05) : 481 - 517
  • [7] Handling Parallel Actions in Probabilistic Planning: Planning Graph as a Basis
    Wang, Yan
    Gao, Jian
    Dong, Bo
    Wang, Dayong
    ITESS: 2008 PROCEEDINGS OF INFORMATION TECHNOLOGY AND ENVIRONMENTAL SYSTEM SCIENCES, PT 1, 2008, : 1102 - 1108
  • [8] GP-genetic planning algorithm based on planning graph
    Chen, Ai-Xiang
    Wu, Li-Hua
    Jiang, Yun-Fei
    Zhang, Xue-Nong
    PROCEEDINGS OF THE IASTED INTERNATIONAL CONFERENCE ON ARTIFICIAL INTELLIGENCE AND APPLICATIONS, 2007, : 457 - +
  • [9] Landmark-based heuristic online contingent planning
    Maliah, Shlomi
    Shani, Guy
    Brafman, Ronen, I
    AUTONOMOUS AGENTS AND MULTI-AGENT SYSTEMS, 2018, 32 (05) : 602 - 634
  • [10] Contingent planning under uncertainty via stochastic satisfiability
    Majercik, SM
    Littman, ML
    ARTIFICIAL INTELLIGENCE, 2003, 147 (1-2) : 119 - 162